Searle, E. B. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2024

Partitioning changes in ecosystem productivity by effects of species interactions in biodiversity experiments

Species interactions affect ecosystem productivity. Positive interactions (resource partitioning and facilitation) increase productivity while negative interactions (species interference) decrease productivity relative to the null expectations defined by monoculture yields. Effects of competitive interactions (resource competition) can be either positive or negative. Distinguishing effects of species interactions is therefore difficult, if not impossible, with current biodiversity experiments involving mixtures and full density monocultures. To partition changes in ecosystem productivity by effects of species interactions, we modify null expectations with competitive growth responses, i.e., proportional changes in individual size (biomass or volume) expected in mixture based on species differences in growth and competitive ability. We use partial density (species density in mixture) monocultures and the competitive exclusion principle to determine maximum competitive growth responses and full density monoculture yields to measure species ability to achieve maximum competitive growth responses in mixture. Deviations of observed yields from competitive expectations represent the effects of positive/negative species interactions, while the differences between competitive and null expectations reflect the effects of competitive interactions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our competitive partitioning model in distinguishing effects of species interactions using both simulated and experimental species mixtures. Our competitive partitioning model enables meaningful assessments of species interactions at both species and community levels and helps disentangle underlying mechanisms of species interactions responsible for changes in ecosystem productivity and identify species mixtures that maximize positive effects.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Forest demography and biomass accumulation rates are associated with transient mean tree size vs density scaling relations

Linking individual and stand-level dynamics during forest development reveals a scaling relationship between mean tree size and tree density in forest stands, which integrates forest structure and function. However, the nature of this so-called scaling law and its variation across broad spatial scales remains unquantified and its linkage with forest demographic processes and carbon dynamics remains elusive. Here we develop a theoretical framework and compile a broad-scale dataset of long-term sample forest stands (n = 1433) from largely undisturbed forests to examine the association of temporal mean tree size vs density scaling trajectories (slopes) with biomass accumulation rates and the sensitivity of scaling slopes to environmental and demographic drivers. The results empirically demonstrate a large variation of scaling slopes, ranging from -4 to -0.2, across forest stands in tropical, temperate and boreal forest biomes. Steeper scaling slopes are associated with higher rates of biomass accumulation, resulting from a lower offset of forest growth by biomass loss from mortality. In North America, scaling slopes are positively correlated with forest stand age and rainfall seasonality, thus suggesting a higher rate of biomass accumulation in younger forests with lower rainfall seasonality. These results demonstrate the strong association of the transient mean tree size vs density scaling trajectories with forest demography and biomass accumulation rates, thus highlighting the promise of leveraging forest structure properties to predict forest demography, carbon fluxes and dynamics at broad spatial scales. Significance StatementMean tree size vs density scaling relationships are thought to predict forest function at broad spatial scales. Here we develop a theoretical framework based upon demographic processes and empirical evidence from forest inventory data to demonstrate a strong association of the transient mean tree size and density scaling trajectories (slopes) with forest demography and biomass accumulation rates. This strong association is pervasive across forest biomes and suggests a negative relationship between scaling slope and biomass accumulation rate (resource availability). Our results highlight the promise of leveraging forest structure (i.e., inferred from high resolution remote sensing data or fused into size-structured demographic models) to evaluate forest demography, carbon fluxes and dynamics at broad spatial scales.

ecology↗