Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Seaman, J. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Seaman, J. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Deep-tissue mechanosensation emerges from the interaction of external force and internal tissue state

Muscle sensation is often considered in terms of proprioception, but muscle pain illustrates that other types of sensory neurons are also involved. Here, we show that trigeminal neurons innervating the masseter muscle fall into three classes: A{beta} low-threshold mechanoreceptors, A{delta} high-threshold mechanoreceptors (A{delta}-HTMRs), and peptidergic neurons (PEP). All three types are recruited by mechanical stimulation, with massage being a particularly effective stimulus. Chemogenetic activation of masseter A{delta}-HTMRs and PEP neurons results in pain-like symptoms. Moreover, acute and chronic inflammation sensitize nociceptors, altering behavioral tolerance in an animal model of massage. Taken together, our results provide a framework for understanding muscle somatosensation and how massage of sore muscles may be painful yet beneficial. SignificanceMuscle sensation is usually most prominent when something goes wrong: after overuse, injury, or inflammation, even ordinary pressure or movement can become painful. Yet how mechanical force is detected in muscle, and when a stimulus becomes painful, remain poorly understood. Here, we identify a simple cellular organization for muscle mechanosensation in which three sensory-neuron classes encode force through graded population recruitment. Massage effectively recruited all three classes, including the two nociceptive populations. We further show that these nociceptive neurons are sensitized by acute and chronic inflammation, leading to enhanced recruitment during massage. These findings show that the representation of mechanical force in muscle can be shaped by tissue state and provide a foundation for understanding muscle soreness, pain, and therapeutic touch.

neuroscience↗

Pain persists in mice lacking both Substance P and CGRPα signaling

The neuropeptides Substance P and CGRP have long been thought important for pain sensation. Both peptides and their receptors are expressed at high levels in pain-responsive neurons from the periphery to the brain making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, drugs targeting these pathways individually did not relieve pain in clinical trials. Since Substance P and CGRP are extensively co-expressed we hypothesized that their simultaneous inhibition would be required for effective analgesia. We therefore generated Tac1 and Calca double knockout (DKO) mice and assessed their behavior using a wide range of pain-relevant assays. As expected, Substance P and CGRP peptides were undetectable throughout the nervous system of DKO mice. To our surprise, these animals displayed largely intact responses to mechanical, thermal, chemical, and visceral pain stimuli, as well as itch. Moreover, chronic inflammatory pain and neurogenic inflammation were unaffected by loss of the two peptides. Finally, neuropathic pain evoked by nerve injury or chemotherapy treatment was also preserved in peptide-deficient mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that even in combination, Substance P and CGRP are not required for the transmission of acute and chronic pain.

neuroscience↗