Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sealey, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Sealey, J. E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Similarities and differences in molecular epidemiology of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli carried by dogs living in urban and nearby rural settings and associated behavioural risk factors

SynopsisO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSOur aims were to compare faecal third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC-R) Escherichia coli isolates from dogs living in a city and in a rural area ~30 km away; to compare isolates from dogs, cattle, and humans in these regions; to determine risk factors associated with 3GC-R E. coli carriage in these two cohorts of dogs. Methods600 dogs were included, with faecal samples processed to recover 3GC-R E. coli using 2 mg/L cefotaxime. WGS was by Illumina; risk factor analyses were multivariable linear regression using the results of an owner-completed survey. Results3GC-R E. coli were excreted by 20/303 rural and 31/297 urban dogs. Dog/human sharing was evident for the dominant canine 3GC-R sequence type, ST963(blaCMY-2). Cattle/dog sharing was evident for CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-32-producing E. coli from rural dogs, including sharing of plasmid pMOO-32, which is common on cattle farms in the area. Feeding raw meat was associated with carrying 3GC-R E. coli in rural dogs, but not in urban dogs, where swimming in rivers was a weak risk factor. ConclusionsGiven clear zoonotic potential for resistant canine E. coli, our work suggests interventions that may reduce this threat. In rural dogs, carriage of 3GC-R E. coli, particularly CTX-M producers, was phylogenetically associated with interaction with local cattle and epidemiologically associated with feeding raw meat. In urban dogs, sources of 3GC-R E. coli appear to be more varied and include environments such as rivers.

microbiology↗

Factors Influencing the Detection of Antibacterial Resistant Escherichia coli in Faecal Samples from Individual Cattle

AimsTo investigate whether on-farm antibacterial usage (ABU), environmental antibacterial resistant (ABR) Escherichia coli prevalence, and sampling and sample handling methodologies are associated with ABR E. coli positivity in individual faecal samples from dairy heifers. Methods and ResultsThree hundred and sixty-four heifers from 37 farms were sampled via rectal or faecal pat sampling. Samples were stored at -80{degrees}C for variable periods before microbiological analysis. Data analysis was through a multilevel, multivariable logistic regression approach. Individual rectal samples had increased odds of positivity for amoxicillin, cefalexin and tetracycline-resistant E. coli. Sample storage for 6-12 month was associated with decreased odds of finding amoxicillin and tetracycline-resistant E. coli. On-farm ABU had little influence, and environmental ABR E. coli prevalence had no significant influence on on the odds of sample-level positivity for ABR E. coli. ConclusionsSampling methodology and sample handling have a greater association than on-farm factors with the detection of ABR E. coli in individual faecal samples from dairy heifers. Significance and Impact of the StudySampling and storage methodologies should be considered carefully at the point of designing ABR surveillance studies in livestock and their environments and, where possible, standardised between and within future studies.

microbiology↗