bioRxiv2026
Enteric methane emissions from ruminant livestock contribute to global warming, creating an urgent need for effective mitigation strategies that do not compromise animal productivity and welfare. Methanogenic archaea within the rumen microbiome drive enteric methane emissions. However, large-scale rumen-fluid sampling in commercial production systems is impractical, due to its invasive nature and the associated logistical challenges. This study hypothesised that rumination enables the capture of rumen microbial signals within the oral cavity and using oral microbiome profiles to provide a practical, non-invasive alternative method for proxy methane phenotyping in commercial production systems. To test the hypothesis, we estimated the oral microbiability, defined as the proportion of phenotypic variance in methane emissions explained by oral microbiome variation. Samples were collected from 209 animals across two trials in Queensland, Australia. Oral microbiome samples were obtained from all animals, with paired rumen samples in one trial, and methane emissions were measured using either the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique or the GreenFeed system. Microbial features were characterised using taxonomic and functional annotations, and microbiability was estimated using mixed linear models incorporating microbiome-based relationship matrices. Although the small sample size limited strong conclusions, the oral microbiability estimates reported in this study were comparable to those derived from rumen samples. Functional microbial profiles generally explained a greater proportion of methane variation than taxonomic profiles, suggesting that microbial function is more closely linked to methane production than community composition alone. However, these differences were not statistically significant due to large standard errors. These findings suggest that oral microbiome sampling potentially provides a practical, minimally invasive, scalable proxy method for methane emissions of individual cattle in grazing systems, where direct methane gas measurements are labour-intensive and difficult to implement. Integrating oral microbiome profiles in the existing breeding model with the host genetics, weight and environmental factors could provide a promising pathway for enabling selection for low emissions and advancing reduced emissions livestock farming under real-world production conditions. Lay summaryCattle produce methane as part of their normal digestion and this contributes to climate change. Reducing methane emission in grazing livestock systems is therefore important. However, measuring methane from individual grazing animals is difficult, costly, and often impractical under commercial conditions. The rumen microbiome has been used as a proxy for estimating methane emissions, but collecting rumen samples is invasive and impractical for large-scale use. Because rumination transfers material from the rumen to the mouth, we investigated whether microbes found in cattle mouths could also be used to estimate how much methane an individual animal produced. We suggest that mouth-swab sampling method can be an alternative to rumen fluid sampling because it was less invasive, relatively quick and practically applicable in commercial conditions. Importantly, the microbiome explained a meaningful proportion of the between-animal variation for methane emission. This suggests that collection of mouth swabs is a potentially scalable alternative proxy method to identify cattle that naturally produce less methane. Overall, our findings support the potential use of oral ruminant microbial information to improve breeding and management strategies aimed at reducing methane emissions while maintaining productive livestock systems. Teaser TextThis study demonstrates that collecting oral swabs from the mouths of grazing beef cattle could provide a scalable method to estimate individual methane emissions in commercial production systems, offering a practical alternative to invasive rumen sampling and complex gas measurement systems. These findings support the development of scalable breeding and management strategies for methane mitigation in large-scale livestock production systems.