Biology subjects

Schwartz, G. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Schwartz, G. W..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Differential Integration of Transcriptome and Proteome Identifies Pan-cancer Prognostic Biomarkers

High-throughput analysis of the transcriptome and proteome individually are used to interrogate complex oncogenic processes in cancer. However, an outstanding challenge is how to combine these complementary, yet partially disparate data sources to accurately identify tumor-specific gene-programs and clinical biomarkers. Here, we introduce inteGREAT for robust and scalable differential integration of high-throughput measurements. With inteGREAT, each data source is represented as a co-expression network, which is analyzed to characterize the local and global structure of each node across networks. inteGREAT scores the degree by which the topology of each gene in both transcriptome and proteome networks are conserved within a tumor type, yet different from other normal or malignant cells. We demonstrated the high performance of inteGREAT based on several analyses: deconvolving synthetic networks, rediscovering known diagnostic biomarkers, establishing relationships between tumor lineages, and elucidating putative prognostic biomarkers which we experimentally validated. Furthermore, we introduce the application of a clumpiness measure to quantitatively describe tumor lineage similarity. Together, inteGREAT not only infers functional and clinical insights from the integration of transcriptomic and proteomic data sources in cancer, but also can be readily applied to other heterogeneous high-throughput data sources. inteGREAT is open source and available to download from https://github.com/faryabib/inteGREAT.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Classes of ITD predict outcomes in patients with AML treated with FLT3 inhibitors

Recurrent internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations are observed in various cancers including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). ITD mutations of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) receptor increase kinase activity, and are associated with poor prognostic outcomes. Currently, several small-molecule FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) are in clinical trials for targeted therapy of high-risk FLT3-ITD-positive AML. However, the variability of survival following FLT3i treatment suggests that the mere presence of FLT3-ITD mutations in a patient might not guarantee effective clinical response to targeted inhibition of FLT3 kinase. Motivated by the heterogeneity of FLT3-ITD mutations, we sought to investigate the effects of FLT3-ITD structural features on response to treatment in AML patients. To this end, we developed HeatITup (HEAT diffusion for Internal Tandem dUPlication), an algorithm to efficiently and accurately identify ITDs and classify them based on their nucleotide composition into newly defined categories of \"typical\" or \"atypical\". Typical ITDs insert sequences are entirely endogenous to the FLT3 locus whereas atypical ITDs contain nucleotides exogenous to the wildtype FLT3. We applied HeatITup to our cohort of de novo and relapsed AML patients. Individuals with AML carrying typical ITDs benefited significantly more from FLT3i than patients with atypical ITDs, regardless of whether FLT3i was used after initial induction or at relapse. Furthermore, analysis of the TCGA AML cohort demonstrated improved survival for patients with typical ITDs treated with induction chemotherapy. These results underscore the importance of structural discernment of complex somatic mutations such as ITDs in progressing towards personalized treatment for AML patients.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Receptive field center-surround interactions mediate context-dependent spatial contrast encoding in the retina

Antagonistic receptive field surrounds are a near-universal property of early sensory processing. A key assumption in many models for retinal ganglion cell encoding is that receptive field surrounds are added only to the fully formed center signal. But anatomical and functional observations indicate that surrounds are added before the summation of signals across receptive field subunits that creates the center. Here, we show that this receptive field architecture has an important consequence for spatial contrast encoding: the surround can control sensitivity to fine spatial structure by changing the way the center integrates visual information over space. The impact of the surround is particularly prominent when center and surround signals are correlated, as they are in natural stimuli. This role of the surround differs substantially from classic center-surround models and raises the possibility that the surround plays unappreciated roles in shaping ganglion cell sensitivity to natural inputs.

neuroscience↗