Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schuster, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Schuster, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Selective Nerve Block of A- or C-Afferents Confirms Dual Role in Touch Pleasantness but Not Touch-Pain Modulation

Gentle and deep pressure are distinct types of touch that often elicit pleasant sensations and modulate pain. Although touch pleasantness has traditionally been attributed to unmyelinated C-tactile afferents, growing evidence suggests an important contribution of myelinated A-fibers. However, the relative role of A- and C-fibers in touch-evoked pleasantness and pain modulation remains unclear. To test the role of A- and C-fibers in touch pleasantness, healthy adults underwent selective peripheral nerve block of the superficial radial nerve to preferentially impair either A- or C-fiber function. Touch pleasantness of brushing (Study 1; N = 24) or deep pressure (Study 2; N = 24) and touch-induced modulation of heat pain were assessed before and after the nerve block. Both nerve blocks significantly reduced the perceived pleasantness of both gentle brushing and deep pressure, supporting a substantial contribution of myelinated A-fibers and well as unmyelinated C-fibers (presumably C-tactile fibers) to affective touch. In addition, block of A-fibers did not diminish touch-induced modulation of experimental heat pain, suggesting a particular pain-inhibiting role for C-tactile fibers. These findings supply causal evidence in healthy adults that myelinated A-fibers are highly involved in touch pleasantness-alongside C-tactile fibers-but are not involved in touch-induced pain relief.

neuroscience↗

Large scale metagenome assembly reveals novel animal-associated microbial genomes, biosynthetic gene clusters, and other genetic diversity

Large-scale metagenome assemblies of human microbiomes have produced a vast catalogue of previously unseen microbial genomes; however, comparatively few microbial genomes derive from other vertebrates. Here, we generated 5596 metagenome-assembled genomes from the gut metagenomes of 180 predominantly wild animal species representing 5 classes, in addition to 14 existing animal gut metagenome datasets. The MAGs comprised 1522 species-level genome bins (SGBs); most of which were novel at the species, genus, or family levels, and the majority were enriched in host versus environment metagenomes. Many traits distinguished SGBs enriched in host or environmental biomes, including the number of antimicrobial resistance genes. We identified 1986 diverse biosynthetic gene clusters; only 23 clustered with any MIBiG database references. Gene-based assembly revealed tremendous gene diversity, much of it host- or environment-specific. Our MAG and gene datasets greatly expand the microbial genome repertoire and provide a broad view of microbial adaptations to the vertebrate gut. ImportanceMicrobiome studies on a select few mammalian species (e.g., humans, mice, and cattle) have revealed a great deal of novel genomic diversity in the gut microbiome. However, little is known of the microbial diversity in the gut of other vertebrates. We studied the gut microbiome of a large set of mostly wild animal species consisting of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Unfortunately, we found that existing reference databases commonly used for metagenomic analyses failed to capture the microbiome diversity among vertebrates. To increase database representation, we applied advanced metagenome assembly methods to our animal gut data and to many public gut metagenome datasets that had not been used to obtain microbial genomes. Our resulting genome and gene cluster collections comprised a great deal of novel taxonomic and genomic diversity, which we extensively characterized. Our findings substantially expand what is known of microbial genomic diversity in the vertebrate gut.

microbiology↗

Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades

Multiple factors modulate microbial community assembly in the gut, but the magnitude of each can vary substantially across studies. This may be in part due to a heavy reliance on captive animals, which can have very different gut microbiomes versus their wild counterparts. In order to better resolve the influence of evolution and diet on gut microbiome diversity, we generated a large and highly diverse animal distal gut 16S rRNA microbiome dataset, which comprises 80 % wild animals and includes members of Mammalia, Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, and Actinopterygii. We decoupled the effects of host evolutionary history and diet on gut microbiome diversity and show that each factor explains different aspects of diversity. Moreover, we resolved particular microbial taxa associated with host phylogeny or diet, and we show that Mammalia have a stronger signal of cophylogeny versus non-mammalian hosts. Additionally, our results from ecophylogenetics and co-occurrence analyses suggest that environmental filtering and microbe-microbe interactions differ among host clades. These findings provide a robust assessment of the processes driving microbial community assembly in the vertebrate intestine.

microbiology↗