Schonvisky, K. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of extracellular vesicles administered intravenously and intranasally to Macaca nemestrina

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have great potential as novel drug carriers for the treatment of various diseases. These lipid bilayer vesicles are naturally abundant in mammalian tissues and circulation, can be loaded with therapeutic small molecule drugs, (si)RNA, proteins and CRISPR/Cas9, and may be engineered for retention by specific tissues. However, many questions remain on the optimal dosing, administration route, and pharmacokinetics of EVs. Previous studies have addressed biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in rodents, but little evidence is available from larger animals. Here, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of Expi293F-derived EVs labelled with a highly sensitive nanoluciferase reporter (palmGRET) in a non-human primate model (Macaca nemestrina), comparing intravenous (IV) and intranasal (IN) administration over a 125-fold dose range. We report that EVs administered IV had markedly longer circulation times in plasma than previously reported in mice, and were detectable in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after 30-60 minutes. Already after one minute following IV administration, we observed EV uptake by PBMCs, most notably B-cells. EVs were detected in liver and spleen within one hour of IV administration. None of the IN doses resulted in readily detectable EV levels in plasma, CSF, or organs, suggesting that IN delivery of EVs in large animals including humans may require reconsideration or pretreatment approaches. Furthermore, EV circulation times strongly decreased after repeated IV administration, possibly due to immune responses and with clear implications for xenogeneic EV-based therapeutics. We hope that our findings from this baseline study in macaques will help to inform future research and therapeutic development of EVs.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2020

Variation in the Gut Microbiota of Common Marmosets: Differences with Colony of Origin and Integration

Characterization of the gut microbiome may aid understanding and management of natural and experimental disease states in research animals, thereby promoting reproducibility. In this study, the rectal bacterial communities of three separate common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) breeding colonies were defined using 16S rRNA sequencing of rectal swab samples. Study animals originated from two German colonies and a United States colony (JHU). The two German cohorts, previously fed the same diet, were imported into the JHU facility; they were then isolated, transitioned onto JHU diet, and then moved into rooms housing JHU animals. To dissect the contributions of diet and integration in shaping the rectal bacterial community, samples were collected from German origin marmosets upon JHU arrival (baseline), following diet transition (100 d), and following cohousing (390 d). Baseline and 390 d samples were collected from stably maintained JHU marmosets. Bacterial community composition was distinct between all three cohorts at baseline, suggesting that factors other than primary diet confer significant differences between captive populations. Beta-diversity of the animals from the two German colonies converged by 100 d but remained distinct from JHU sample beta-diversity throughout the 390-d study, indicating that diet had greater influence on bacterial community composition than did housing animals within the same room. Our results demonstrate substantial differences in gut bacteria between different captive marmoset colonies, with persistence of these differences following husbandry standardization and housing integration. Goals of rigor and reproducibility in research underscore the need to consider microbial differences between marmosets of diverse origin. ImportanceCharacterizing gut microbial populations is expected to promote health and enhance research reproducibility in animal studies. As use of common marmosets as animal models of human diseases expands, evaluating the marmoset gut bacterial community will be critical for interpreting research findings, especially as marmosets are prone to gastrointestinal inflammation. In this study, using 16S rRNA sequencing of rectal swab samples, we compared bacterial community among three captive colonies of marmosets at baseline and following importation of cohorts from two of the colonies into the third colony. Diet history had sustained influence on bacterial community composition, while housing the animals within the same room over a period of eight months did not appear to be a major factor. These persistent differences in marmoset gut bacterial community highlight the need for careful consideration of animal origin as a variable in marmoset research studies.

microbiology↗