Biology subjects

Scholz, A. H.

Publications and source records attributed to Scholz, A. H..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Making the Monitoring Framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework fit for purpose.

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is the most ambitious agreement on biodiversity conservation and sustainable use to date. It calls for a whole-of government and whole-of-society approach to halt and reverse biodiversity loss worldwide. The Monitoring Framework of the GBF lays out how Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are expected to report their progress. A CBD expert group provided guidance on its implementation, including a gap analysis to identify the strengths and limitations of the indicators in the Monitoring Framework. We present the results of the gap analysis, highlight where more work is needed and provide recommendations on implementing and improving monitoring to allow effective and comprehensive tracking of the GBFs ambition. We find that with the headline and binary indicators, which Parties are required to use, the Monitoring Framework fully covers 19% of the GBFs ambition and partially covers an additional 40%. Including disaggregations of the headline indicators improves coverage to 22% fully and an additional 41% partially. Adding optional (component and complementary) indicators brings full coverage to 29% with an additional 47% partial coverage. No indicators are available for 12% of the GBF. In practice, the coverage of the Monitoring Framework will depend on which indicators (headline and binary as well as component and complementary) and disaggregations are used by countries. Disaggregations are particularly relevant to monitor the cross-cutting considerations defined under section C. Substantial investment is required to collect the necessary data to compute indicators, infer change, and effectively monitor progress. We highlight important next steps to progressively improve the efficacy of the Monitoring Framework.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information

The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) formally recognized the sovereign rights of nations over their biological diversity. Implicit within the treaty is the idea that mega-biodiverse countries will provide genetic resources and grant access to them and scientists in high-income countries will use these resources and share back benefits. However, little research has been conducted on how this framework is reflected in real-life scientific practice. Currently, parties to the CBD) are debating whether or not digital sequence information (DSI) should be regulated under a new benefit-sharing framework. At this critical time point in the upcoming international negotiations, we test the fundamental hypothesis of provision and use by looking at the global patterns of access and use in scientific publications. Our data reject the provider-user relationship and suggest far more complex information flow for digital sequence information. Therefore, any new policy decisions on digital sequence information should be aware of the high level of use of DSI across low- and middle-income countries and seek to preserve open access to this crucial common good.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2021

Quantitative monitoring of nucleotide sequence data from genetic resources in context of their citation in the scientific literature

BackgroundLinking nucleotide sequence data (NSD) to scientific publication citations can enhance understanding of NSDs provenance, scientific use, and re-use in the community. By connecting publications with NSD records, NSD geographical provenance information, and author geographical information, it becomes possible to assess the contribution of NSD to infer trends in scientific knowledge gain at the global level. FindingsFor this data note, we extracted and linked records from the European Nucleotide Archive to citations in open-access publications aggregated at Europe PubMed Central. A total of 8,464,292 ENA accessions with geographical provenance information were associated with publications. We conducted a data quality review to uncover potential issues in publication citation information extraction and author affiliation tagging and developed and implemented best-practice recommendations for citation extraction. Flat data tables and an data warehouse with an interactive web application were constructed to enable ad hoc exploration of NSD use and summary statistics. ConclusionsThe extraction and linking of NSD with associated publication citations enables transparency. The quality review contributes to enhanced text mining methods for identifier extraction and use. Furthermore, the global provision and use of NSD enables scientists around the world to join literature and sequence databases in a multidimensional fashion. As a concrete use case, statistics of country clusters were visualized with respect to NSD access in the context of discussions around digital sequence information under the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.

bioinformatics↗