Biology subjects

Schoffelen, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Schoffelen, J. M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

The impact of CSF-filled cavities on scalp EEG and its implications

Previous studies have found EEG amplitude and scalp topography differences between neurotypical and neurological/neurosurgical groups, being interpreted at the cognitive level. However, these comparisons are invariably accompanied by anatomical changes. Critical to EEG are the so-called volume currents, which are affected by the spatial distribution of the different tissues in the head. We investigated the effect of CSF-filled cavities on simulated EEG scalp data. We simulated EEG scalp potentials for known sources using different volume conduction models: a reference model (i.e., unlesioned brain) and models with realistic CSF-filled cavities gradually increasing in size. We used this approach for a single source close or far from the CSF-lesion cavity, and for a scenario with a distributed configuration of sources (i.e., a "cognitive ERP effect"). Magnitude and topography error between the reference and lesion models were quantified. For the single-source simulation close to the lesion, the CSF-filled lesion modulated signal amplitude with more than 17% magnitude error, and topography with more than 9% topographical error. Negligible modulation was found for the single source far from the lesion. For the multi-source simulations of the cognitive effect, the CSF-filled lesion modulated signal amplitude with more than 6% magnitude error, and topography with more than 16% topography error in a non-monotonic fashion. In conclusion, the impact of a CSF-filled cavity cannot be neglected for scalp-level EEG data. Especially when group-level comparisons are made, any scalp-level attenuated, aberrant, or absent effects are difficult to interpret without considering the confounding effect of CSF. Impact statementPrevious studies have found EEG amplitude and scalp topography differences between neurotypical and neurological/neurosurgical groups (whose brain damage leads to the presence of a CSF-filled cavity), being interpreted at the cognitive level. Via simulations of scalp-level EEG patterns, we show that attenuated, aberrant, or absent effects in these comparisons are difficult to interpret without considering the confounding effect of CSF. FundingThis study was partly supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [NWO]) to V. P. (451-17-003 and VI.Vidi.201.081) and to the Language in Interaction Consortium (024-001-006). CRediTVP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing RO: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - review & editing JMS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - review & editing MCP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing - review & editing

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Words in context: tracking context-processing during language comprehension using computational language models and MEG

The meaning of a word depends on its lexical semantics and on the context in which it is embedded. At the basis of this lays the distinction between lexical retrieval and integration, two basic operations supporting language comprehension. In this paper, we investigate how lexical retrieval and integration are implemented in the brain by comparing MEG activity to word representations generated by computational language models. We test both non-contextualized embeddings, representing words independently from their context, and contextualized embeddings, which instead integrate contextual information in their representations. Using representational similarity analysis over cortical regions and over time, we observed that brain activity in the left anterior temporal pole and inferior frontal regions shows higher similarity with contextualized word embeddings compared to non-contextualized embeddings, between 300 and 500 ms after word presentation. On the other hand, non-contextualized word embeddings show higher similarity with brain activity in the left lateral and anterior temporal lobe at earlier latencies - areas and latencies related to lexical retrieval. Our results highlight how lexical retrieval and context integration can be tracked in the brain using word embeddings obtained with computational models. These results also suggest that the distinction between lexical retrieval and integration might be framed in terms of context-independent and contextualized representations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization

Beamformers are applied for estimating spatiotemporal characteristics of neuronal sources underlying measured MEG/EEG signals. Several MEG analysis toolboxes include an implementation of a linearly constrained minimum-variance (LCMV) beamformer. However, differences in implementations and in their results complicate the selection and application of beamformers and may hinder their wider adoption in research and clinical use. Additionally, combinations of different MEG sensor types (such as magnetometers and planar gradiometers) and application of preprocessing methods for interference suppression, such as signal space separation (SSS), can affect the results in different ways for different implementations. So far, a systematic evaluation of the different implementations has not been performed. Here, we compared the localization performance of the LCMV beamformer pipelines in four widely used open-source toolboxes (FieldTrip, SPM12, Brainstorm, and MNE-Python) using datasets both with and without SSS interference suppression.\n\nWe analyzed MEG data that were i) simulated, ii) recorded from a static and moving phantom, and iii) recorded from a healthy volunteer receiving auditory, visual, and somatosensory stimulation. We also investigated the effects of SSS and the combination of the magnetometer and gradiometer signals. We quantified how localization error and point-spread volume vary with SNR in all four toolboxes.\n\nWhen applied carefully to MEG data with a typical SNR (3-15 dB), all four toolboxes localized the sources reliably; however, they differed in their sensitivity to preprocessing parameters. As expected, localizations were highly unreliable at very low SNR, but we found high localization error also at very high SNRs. We also found that the SNR improvement offered by SSS led to more accurate localization.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Stimulus-modality independent activation of the brain network for language

The meaning of a sentence can be understood, whether presented in written or spoken form. Therefore it is highly probable that brain processes supporting language comprehension are at least partly independent of sensory modality. To identify where and when in the brain language processing is independent of sensory modality, we directly compared neuromagnetic brain signals of 200 human subjects (102 males) either reading or listening to sentences. We used multiset canonical correlation analysis to align individual subject data in a way that boosts those aspects of the signal that are common to all, allowing us to capture word-by-word signal variations, consistent across subjects and at a fine temporal scale. Quantifying this consistency in activation across both reading and listening tasks revealed a mostly left hemispheric cortical network. Areas showing consistent activity patterns include not only areas previously implicated in higher-level language processing, such as left prefrontal, superior & middle temporal areas and anterior temporal lobe, but also parts of the control-network as well as subcentral and more posterior temporal-parietal areas. Activity in this supramodal sentence processing network starts in temporal areas and rapidly spreads to the other regions involved. The findings do not only indicate the involvement of a large network of brain areas in supramodal language processing, but also indicate that the linguistic information contained in the unfolding sentences modulates brain activity in a word-specific manner across subjects.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Supramodal sentence processing in the human brain: fMRI evidence for the influence of syntactic complexity in more than 200 participants

This study investigated two questions. One is to which degree sentence processing beyond single words is independent of the input modality (speech vs. reading). The second question is which parts of the network recruited by both modalities is sensitive to syntactic complexity. These questions were investigated by having more than 200 participants read or listen to well-formed sentences or series of unconnected words. A largely left-hemisphere fronto-temporoparietal network was found to be supramodal in nature, i.e. independent of input modality. In addition, the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (LpMTG) were most clearly associated with left-branching complexity. The left anterior middle temporal gyrus (LaMTG) showed the greatest sensitivity to sentences that differed in right-branching complexity. Moreover, activity in LIFG and LpMTG increased from sentence onset to end, in parallel with an increase of the left-branching complexity. While LIFG, bilateral anterior and posterior MTG and left inferior parietal lobe (LIPL) all contribute to the supramodal unification processes, the results suggest that these regions differ in their respective contributions to syntactic complexity related processing. The consequences of these findings for neurobiological models of language processing are discussed.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Frequency-specific directed interactions in the human brain network for language

The brains remarkable capacity for language requires bidirectional interactions between functionally specialized brain regions. We used magnetoencephalography to investigate interregional interactions in the brain network for language, while 102 participants were reading sentences. Using Granger causality analysis, we identified inferior frontal cortex and anterior temporal regions to receive widespread input, and middle temporal regions to send widespread output. This fits well with the notion that these regions play a central role in language processing. Characterization of the functional topology of this network, using data-driven matrix factorization, which allowed for partitioning into a set of subnetworks, revealed directed connections at distinct frequencies of interaction. Connections originating from temporal regions peaked at alpha frequency, whereas connections originating from frontal and parietal regions peaked at beta frequency. These findings indicate that processing different types of linguistic information may depend on the contributions of distinct brain rhythms.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryCommunication between language relevant areas in the brain is supported by rhythmic synchronization, where different rhythms reflect the direction of information flow.

neuroscience↗