Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schoebi, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Schoebi, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function

The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) has been proposed as a biomarker of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) dysfunction in schizophrenia. Pathophysiological theories suggest that such dysfunction might be partially caused by aberrant interactions of different modulatory neurotransmitters with NMDARs, which could explain heterogeneity among patients with schizophrenia and their treatment response. Understanding the differential impact of different neuromodulators on readouts of NMDAR function is therefore of high clinical relevance. Here, we report results from two studies (N=81 each) which systematically tested whether the MMN is sensitive to diminishing and enhancing cholinergic vs. dopaminergic function. Both studies used a double-blind, placebo-controlled between-subject design and monitored individual drug plasma levels. Using a novel variant of the auditory oddball paradigm, we contrasted phases with stable versus volatile probabilities of tone switches. In the first study, we found that the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist biperiden reduced and/or delayed mismatch responses, particularly during stable phases of the experiment, whereas this effect was absent for amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist. The direct comparison between biperiden and amisulpride indicated a significant drug x mismatch interaction. In the second study, neither elevating acetylcholine nor dopamine levels via administration of galantamine and levodopa, respectively, exerted significant effects on MMN. Overall, our results indicate differential sensitivity of the MMN to changes in cholinergic (muscarinic) versus dopaminergic receptor function. This finding may prove useful for developments of future tools for predicting individual treatment responses in disorders that show abnormal MMN, such as schizophrenia.

neuroscience↗

Computational dissociation of dopaminergic and cholinergic effects on voluntary behavior and inhibitory control

BackgroundPatients with schizophrenia make more errors than healthy subjects on the antisaccade task. In this paradigm, participants are required to inhibit a reflexive saccade to a target and to select the correct action (a saccade in the opposite direction). While the precise origin of this deficit is not clear, it has been connected to aberrant dopaminergic and cholinergic neuromodulation. MethodsTo study the impact of dopamine and acetylcholine on inhibitory control and action selection, we administered two selective drugs (levodopa 200mg/galantamine 8mg) to healthy volunteers (N=100) performing the antisaccade task. A computational model (SERIA) was employed to separate the contribution of inhibitory control and action selection to empirical reaction times and error rates. ResultsModeling suggested that levodopa improved action selection (at the cost of increased reaction times) but did not have a significant effect on inhibitory control. By contrast, according to our model, galantamine affected inhibitory control in a dose dependent fashion, reducing inhibition failures at low doses and increasing them at higher levels. These effects were sufficiently specific that the computational analysis allowed for identifying the drug administered to an individual with 70% accuracy. ConclusionsOur results do not support the hypothesis that elevated tonic dopamine strongly impairs inhibitory control. Rather levodopa improved the ability to select correct actions. Instead, inhibitory control was modulated by cholinergic drugs. This approach may provide a starting point for future computational assays that differentiate neuromodulatory abnormalities in heterogeneous diseases like schizophrenia.

pharmacology and toxicology↗