Biology subjects

Schmoller, K. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Schmoller, K. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Transcription coordinates histone amounts and genome content

Biochemical reactions typically depend on the concentrations of the molecules involved, and cell survival therefore critically depends on the concentration of proteins. To maintain constant protein concentrations during cell growth, global mRNA and protein synthesis rates are tightly linked to cell volume. While such regulation is appropriate for most proteins, certain cellular structures do not scale with cell volume. The most striking example of this is the genomic DNA, which doubles during the cell cycle and increases with ploidy, but is independent of cell volume. Here, we show that the amount of histone proteins is coupled to the DNA content, even though mRNA and protein synthesis globally increase with cell volume. As a consequence, and in contrast to the global trend, histone concentrations (i.e. amounts per volume) decrease with cell volume but increase with ploidy. We find that this distinct coordination of histone homeostasis and genome content is already achieved at the transcript level, and is an intrinsic property of histone promoters that does not require direct feedback mechanisms. Mathematical modelling and histone promoter truncations reveal a simple and generalizable mechanism to control the cell volume- and ploidy-dependence of a given gene through the balance of the initiation and elongation rates.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Size-independent mRNA synthesis and chromatin-based partitioning mechanisms generate and maintain constant amounts of protein per cell

Biosynthesis scales with cell size such that protein concentrations generally remain constant as cells grow. As an exception, synthesis of the cell-cycle inhibitor Whi5 sub-scales with cell size so that its concentration is lower in larger cells to promote cell-cycle entry. Here, we find that a transcriptional control uncouples Whi5 synthesis from cell size and, screening for similar genes, identify histones as the major class of sub-scaling transcripts besides WHI5. Histone synthesis is thereby matched to genome content rather than cell size. Such sub-scaling proteins are challenged by asymmetric cell division because proteins are typically partitioned in proportion to new-born cell volume. To avoid this fate, Whi5 uses chromatin-binding to partition similar protein amounts to each new-born cell regardless of cell size. Finally, disrupting both Whi5 synthesis and chromatin-based partitioning compromises G1 size control. Thus, specific transcriptional and partitioning mechanisms determine protein sub-scaling to control cell size.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Whi5 is diluted and protein synthesis does not dramatically increase in pre-Start G1

In their manuscript, Litsios et al.1 report a new model for how cell growth and biosynthetic activity control the G1/S transition in budding yeast. In essence, Litsios et al. claim that Start is driven by an increasing concentration of the G1 cyclin Cln3 due to a dramatic acceleration of protein synthesis in pre-Start G1 and not by the dilution of the cell cycle inhibitor Whi5. While we previously reported that Start was in part driven by cell growth during G1 diluting out the Start inhibitor Whi52, Litsios et al. report that Whi5 remains at constant concentration during G1, and changes in Whi5 concentration therefore do not contribute to Start. Since Litsios et al. directly contradict several key points of our own model of how cell growth triggers Start, we decided to investigate their claims and data. More specifically, we decided to investigate Litsios et al.s three major claims: O_LIWhi5 concentration remains constant during G1 C_LIO_LICln3 concentration strongly increases prior to Start C_LIO_LIGlobal protein synthesis rates increase by 2-3 fold prior to Start C_LI We investigated each of these three claims and found that the evidence presented by Litsios et al. does not support their claims due to inadequate analysis methods and flaws in their experiments.

molecular biology↗