Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schlüter, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Schlüter, C..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust associations between white matter microstructure and general intelligence

Early research on the neural correlates of human intelligence was almost exclusively focused on gray matter properties. The advent of diffusion-weighted imaging led to an exponential growth of white matter brain imaging studies. However, this line of research has yielded mixed observations, especially about the relations between general intelligence and white matter microstructure. We used a multi-center approach to identify white matter regions that show replicable structure-function associations, employing data from four independent samples comprising over 2000 healthy participants. We used tract-based spatial statistics to examine associations between g factor scores and white matter microstructure and identified 188 voxels which exhibited positive associations between g factor scores and fractional anisotropy in all four data sets. Replicable voxels formed three clusters: one located around the forceps minor, crossing with extensions of the anterior thalamic radiation, the cingulum-cingulate gyrus, and the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus in the left hemisphere, one located around the left-hemispheric superior longitudinal fasciculus, and one located around the left-hemispheric cingulum-cingulate gyrus, crossing with extensions of the anterior thalamic radiation and the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Our results indicate that individual differences in general intelligence are robustly associated with white matter organization in specific fiber bundles.

neuroscience↗

Structural architecture and brain network efficiency links polygenic scores to intelligence

Intelligence is highly heritable. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have shown that thousands of alleles contribute to variation in intelligence with small effect sizes. Polygenic scores (PGS), which combine these effects into one genetic summary measure, are increasingly used to investigate polygenic effects in independent samples. Whereas PGS explain a considerable amount of variance in intelligence, it is largely unknown how brain structure and function mediate this relationship. Here we show that individuals with higher PGS for educational attainment and intelligence had higher scores on cognitive tests, larger surface area, and more efficient fiber connectivity derived by graph theory. Fiber network efficiency as well as surface of brain areas partly located in parieto-frontal regions were found to mediate the relationship between PGS and cognitive performance. These findings are a crucial step forward in decoding the neurogenetic underpinnings of intelligence, as they identify specific regional networks that link polygenic predisposition to intelligence.

genetics↗

Polygenic Scores for Cognitive Abilities and their Association with Different Aspects of General Intelligence - a Deep Phenotyping Approach

Intelligence is a highly polygenic trait and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of DNA variants contributing with small effects. Polygenic scores (PGS) can aggregate those effects for trait prediction in independent samples. As large-scale light-phenotyping GWAS operationalized intelligence as performance in rather superficial tests, the question arises which intelligence facets are actually captured. We used deep-phenotyping to investigate the molecular determinants of individual differences in cognitive ability. We therefore studied the association between PGS of intelligence (IQ-PGS), cognitive performance (CP-PGS) and educational attainment (EA-PGS) with a wide range of intelligence facets in a sample of 557 healthy adults. IQ-PGS, CP-PGS and EA-PGS had the highest incremental R2s for general (2.71%; 4.27%; 2.06%), verbal (3.30%; 4.64%; 1.61%) and numerical intelligence (3.06%; 3.24%; 1.26%) and the weakest for non-verbal intelligence (0.89%; 1.47%; 0.70%) and memory (0.80%; 1.06%; 0.67%). These results indicate that PGS derived from light-phenotyping GWAS do not reflect different facets of intelligence equally well, and thus should not be interpreted as genetic indicators of intelligence per se. The findings refine our understanding of how PGS are related to other traits or life outcomes.

genetics↗