Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schipper, J. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Schipper, J. G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of picornavirus proteins that inhibit de novo nucleotide synthesis during infection

The picornavirus family includes well-known pathogens for humans and animals, such as enteroviruses (e.g. poliovirus, coxsackievirus, rhinovirus) and cardioviruses (e.g. encephalomyocarditis virus [EMCV] and Saffold virus). Picornaviruses modulate cellular metabolism likely to generate sufficient building blocks for virus replication. Previously, we showed that coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and EMCV remodel nucleotide metabolism during infection. Here, we investigated whether this modulation is attributable to specific viral proteins. For this, we studied the modulation of metabolism by several recombinant CVB3 and EMCV viruses in HeLa cells. Using isotope tracing metabolomics with three distinct labels, 13C6-glucose or 13C5/15N2-glutamine, we reveal that the 2A protease of CVB3 and the Leader protein of EMCV inhibit de novo nucleotide synthesis. Furthermore, we show that nucleotide metabolism is also reprogrammed by CVB3 and EMCV in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Our insights are important to increase understanding of picornavirus-host interactions and may lead to novel therapeutic strategies.

microbiology↗

Fc-dependent protective efficacy of non-inhibitory antibodies targeting influenza A virus neuraminidase is limited by epitope availability

Antibodies targeting hemagglutinin and neuraminidase (NA) are key components of the adaptive immune response against influenza A virus (IAV). However, antigenic drift allows the virus to escape inhibition by such antibodies. In this study, we aimed to isolate antibodies with cross-subtype reactivity against human H1N1 and H3N2 IAVs from transgenic mice bearing genes encoding the human immunoglobulin variable regions. We immunized these mice with recombinant N1 and N2 NA proteins, presenting them either as unconjugated soluble proteins or conjugated to self-assembling protein nanoparticles. This approach yielded a panel of NA-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with various levels of intra-and inter-subtype reactivity for N1 and N2 NA. Three of these mAbs, which collectively recognize two distinct epitopes, were cross-reactive against N1 and N2 NAs in ELISA, but did not inhibit NA enzymatic activity. Two of these mAbs, 21H8 and 45D9, were selected for further characterization. These recognized different epitopes and induced Fc-mediated effector functions to varying extents. Prophylactic administration of 21H8, but not 45D9, protected mice against challenge with H1N1 IAV, while neither mAb protected against a H3N2 challenge. The observed protective efficacy correlated with the mAbs capacity, or lack thereof, to bind membrane-associated full-length NA. The introduction of Fc silencing mutations in mAb 21H8 resulted in an inability to activate NK cells or mediate phagocytosis in vitro and significantly reduced protection in vivo, indicating that the protective efficacy of mAb 21H8 is Fc-dependent. However, mAb 21H8 expressed with reduced core fucosylation of its Fc N-glycan, which specifically enhanced NK cell activation in vitro, failed to improve protection against H1N1 challenge in vivo. Future work is needed to decipher in more detail the mechanism of Fc-mediated protection against influenza via NA-specific antibodies and to identify the optimal strategies for their enhancement.

microbiology↗

SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein inhibits the stress response through RNA-binding domain N2b

The nucleocapsid protein N of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enwraps and condenses the viral genome for packaging but is also an antagonist of the innate antiviral defense. It suppresses the integrated stress response (ISR), purportedly by interacting with stress granule (SG) assembly factors G3BP1 and 2, and inhibits type I interferon responses. To elucidate its mode of action, we systematically deleted and over-expressed distinct regions and domains. We show that N via domain N2b blocks PKR-mediated ISR activation, as measured by suppression of ISR-induced translational arrest and SG formation. N2b mutations that prevent dsRNA binding abrogate these activities also when introduced in the intact N protein. Substitutions reported to block post-translation modifications of N or its interaction with G3BP1/2 did not have a detectable additive effect. In an encephalomyocarditis virus-based infection model, N2b - but not a derivative defective in RNA binding - prevented PKR activation, inhibited {beta}-interferon expression and promoted virus replication. Apparently, SARS-CoV-2 N inhibits innate immunity by sequestering dsRNA to prevent activation of PKR and RIG-I-like receptors. Similar observations were made for the N protein of human coronavirus 229E, suggesting that this may be a general trait conserved among members of other orthocoronavirus (sub)genera. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTSARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein N is an antagonist of innate immunity but how it averts virus detection by intracellular sensors remains subject to debate. We provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 N, by sequestering dsRNA through domain N2b, prevents PKR-mediated activation of the integrated stress response as well as detection by RIG-I-like receptors and ensuing type I interferon expression. This function, conserved in human coronavirus 229E, is not affected by mutations that prevent posttranslational modifications, previously implicated in immune evasion, or that target its binding to stress granule scaffold proteins. Our findings further our understanding of how SARS-CoV-2 evades innate immunity, how this may drive viral evolution and why increased N expression may have been a selective advantage to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

microbiology↗

Heterogeneity in viral replication dynamics shapes the antiviral response

In response to virus infection, host cells can activate antiviral signaling to restrict virus replication and communicate viral infection to neighboring cells. For poorly understood reasons, antiviral response activation is highly heterogeneous among infected cells; both quantitatively (level of pathway activation) and qualitatively (transcribed antiviral gene set). Here, we used live-cell single-molecule imaging to simultaneously visualize viral infection and antiviral signaling, providing quantitative insights into antiviral response activation in single cells; first, the probability of activating an antiviral response varies throughout infection, with most efficient activation occurring several hours after the first viral replication. Second, cell-to-cell heterogeneity in viral replication rates early in infection determine the efficiency of antiviral response activation. Finally, variation in signaling strength of the viral sensing pathway result in qualitatively distinct antiviral responses. Together, this works identifies key parameters that shape the antiviral response and provides quantitative insights into the origin of heterogeneity in the antiviral response.

immunology↗