Biology subjects

Schertler, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Schertler, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Global invasion patterns and dynamics of disease vector mosquitoes

Mosquitoes are regarded as the most dangerous creatures on earth, spreading deadly pathogens through their bites. Human activities are driving range expansions of many mosquito species by unintentionally introducing them beyond their native ranges. Despite the often dire consequences for human health, a global picture of the introduction trends and the resulting range expansions of mosquitoes is missing. Here, we describe the global invasion patterns of mosquitoes that are vectors of human diseases and analyze the drivers shaping them. In addition, we provide the dataset compiled for these analyses which represent the most up-to-date standardized information on first records for this taxonomic group at a regional level. Our findings reveal that a total of 45 mosquito species have hitherto been introduced into regions outside their native range worldwide, representing 24% of those known to transmit human pathogens in the wild (i.e., outside experimental conditions), with 27 species successfully established. There has been a steep increase in introductions of emerging non-native mosquito species since the mid-20th century when 28 species (62% of all introduced species) were recorded for the first time. In just the last two decades, 12 new species have been identified. The geography of introductions largely mirrors global trade and transportation flows. Initially, most introduced species were native to Africa, but over time, Asian species have become more dominant. North America, Australia and Europe have consistently been the primary recipients. Our results provide a foundation for addressing the increasing threat of non-native vector mosquitoes globally, emphasizing the need for international cooperation and comprehensive control measures to mitigate their impact on public health.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

A synthesis on alien mammals threatened in their native range

Many alien species are safe in their native ranges; however, some are threatened, posing a challenging conundrum for conservation and invasion science. We focused on alien threatened mammals, examining their distribution, pathways, threats, and conservation strategies. We also reassessed their IUCN Red List category to evaluate the effect of including alien populations in extinction risk assessments. Of 242 alien mammals, we identified 41 aliens that are threatened, classified as critically endangered (19%), endangered (27%), or vulnerable (54%). They were primarily introduced for hunting and exchanged within Asia, with introduced ranges concentrated in eastern Australia. They were subject to multiple threats, most notably biological resource use. Including alien populations in the categorization assessments reduces extinction risk of 22% of the species. We highlighted the conservation value of alien populations for threatened mammals. However, conservation managers and extinction risk assessors shall carefully consider their use, to avoid negative impacts on native biodiversity.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

How moral values influence conservation: a framework to capture different management perspectives

Perspectives in conservation are based on a variety of value systems. Such differences in how people value nature and its components lead to different evaluations of the morality of conservation goals and approaches, and often underlie disagreements in the formulation and implementation of environmental management policies. Specifically, whether a conservation action (e.g. killing feral cats to reduce predation on bird species threatened with extinction) is viewed as appropriate or not can vary among people with different value systems. Here, we present a conceptual, mathematical framework intended as a tool to systematically explore and clarify core value statements in conservation approaches. Its purpose is to highlight how fundamental differences between these value systems can lead to different prioritizations of available management options and offer a common ground for discourse. The proposed equations decompose the question underlying many controversies around management decisions in conservation: what or who is valued, how, and to what extent? We compare how management decisions would likely be viewed under three different idealised value systems: ecocentric conservation, which aims to preserve biodiversity; new conservation, which considers that biodiversity can only be preserved if it benefits humans; and sentientist conservation, which aims at minimising suffering for sentient beings. We illustrate the utility of the framework by applying it to case studies involving invasive alien species, rewilding, and trophy hunting. By making value systems and their consequences in practice explicit, the framework facilitates debates on contested conservation issues, and complements philosophical discursive approaches about moral reasoning. We believe dissecting the core value statements on which conservation decisions are based will provide an additional tool to understand and address conservation conflicts.

ecology↗