Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Scharf, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Scharf, J. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Concordance Of Genetic Variation That Increases Risk For Tourette Syndrome And That Influences Its Underlying Neurocircuitry

BACKGROUNDThere have been considerable recent advances in understanding the genetic architecture of Tourette Syndrome (TS) as well as its underlying neurocircuitry. However, the mechanisms by which genetic variations that increase risk for TS - and its main symptom dimensions - influence relevant brain regions are poorly understood. Here we undertook a genome-wide investigation of the overlap between TS genetic risk and genetic influences on the volume of specific subcortical brain structures that have been implicated in TS.\n\nMETHODSWe obtained summary statistics for the most recent TS genome-wide association study (GWAS) from the TS Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Working Group (4,644 cases and 8,695 controls) and GWAS of subcortical volumes from the ENIGMA consortium (30,717 individuals). We also undertook analyses using GWAS summary statistics of key symptom factors in TS, namely social disinhibition and symmetry behaviour. SNP Effect Concordance Analysis (SECA) was used to examine genetic pleiotropy - the same SNP affecting two traits - and concordance - the agreement in SNP effect directions across these two traits. In addition, a conditional false discovery rate (FDR) analysis was performed, conditioning the TS risk variants on each of the seven subcortical and the intracranial brain volume GWAS. Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression (LDSR) was used as validation of SECA.\n\nRESULTSSECA revealed significant pleiotropy between TS and putaminal (p=2x10-4) and caudal (p=4x10-4) volumes, independent of direction of effect, and significant concordance between TS and lower thalamic volume (p=1x10-3). LDSR lent additional support for the association between TS and thalamic volume (p=5.85x10-2). Furthermore, SECA revealed significant evidence of concordance between the social disinhibition symptom dimension and lower thalamic volume (p=1x10-3), as well as concordance between symmetry behaviour and greater putaminal volume (p=7x10-4). Conditional FDR analysis further revealed novel variants significantly associated with TS (p<8x10-7) when conditioning on intracranial (rs2708146, q=0.046; and rs72853320, q=0.035 and hippocampal (rs1922786, q=0.001 volumes respectively.\n\nCONCLUSIONThese data indicate concordance for genetic variations involved in disorder risk and subcortical brain volumes in TS. Further work with larger samples is needed to fully delineate the genetic architecture of these disorders and their underlying neurocircuitry.

genomics

Examination of the Shared Genetic Basis of Anorexia Nervosa and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Anorexia nervosa (AN) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are often comorbid and likely to share genetic risk factors. Hence, we examine their shared genetic background using a crossdisorder GWAS meta-analysis of 3,495 AN cases, 2,688 OCD cases and 18,013 controls. We confirmed a high genetic correlation between AN and OCD (rg = 0.49 {+/-} 0.13, p = 9.07x10-7) and a sizable SNP heritability (SNP h2 = 0.21 {+/-} 0.02) for the cross-disorder phenotype. Although no individual loci reached genome-wide significance, the cross-disorder phenotype showed strong positive genetic correlations with other psychiatric phenotypes (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, neuroticism) and negative correlations with metabolic phenotypes (e.g., BMI, triglycerides). Follow-up analyses revealed that although AN and OCD overlap heavily in their shared risk with other psychiatric phenotypes, the relationship with metabolic and anthropometric traits is markedly stronger for AN than for OCD. We further tested whether shared genetic risk for AN/OCD was associated with particular tissue or cell-type gene expression patterns and found that the basal ganglia and medium spiny neurons were most enriched for AN/OCD risk, consistent with neurobiological findings for both disorders. Our results confirm and extend genetic epidemiological findings of shared risk between AN and OCD and suggest that larger GWASs are warranted.

genetics