Biology subjects

Sauerbrei, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Sauerbrei, B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Specific connectivity optimizes learning in thalamocortical loops

1Cortico-thalamo-cortical loops have a central role in cognition and motor control, but precisely how thalamus contributes to these processes is unclear. Recent studies showing evidence of plasticity in thalamocortical synapses indicate a role for thalamus in shaping cortical dynamics - and thus behavior - through learning. Since corticothalamic projections compress cortical activity into a lower-dimensional thalamic activity space, we hypothesized that the computational role of thalamus would depend critically on the structure of corticothalamic connectivity. To test this, we identified the optimal corticothalamic structure that promotes biologically plausible learning in thalamocortical synapses. We found that corticothalamic structures specialized to carry an efference copy of the cortical output benefit motor control, while corticothalamic connections that communicate the directions of highest variance in cortical activity are optimal for working memory tasks. We analyzed neural recordings from mice performing grasping and delayed discrimination, and found corticothalamic interactions consistent with these predictions. These results suggest that thalamus orchestrates cortical dynamics in a functionally precise manner through structured connectivity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

The Pontine Nuclei are an Integrative Cortico-Cerebellar Link Critical for Dexterity

Skillful control of movement requires coordination between brain areas that are reciprocally connected through polysynaptic pathways, forming closed loops. A prominent loop in mammals runs between cerebral cortex and cerebellum, which individually contribute to skilled arm control. But how and why do these regions interact? Here, we studied the mouse cortico-cerebellar loop by optogenetically perturbing the pontine nuclei (PN), which receive direct cortical inputs and project only to cerebellum. PN stimulation during rest propagated into cerebellar cortex, but the effect of stimulation was transformed downstream into a wide range of patterns in the deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN) and reduced to transient excitation in motor cortex. PN stimulation in a cued reaching task altered arm kinematics and impaired performance. Cerebellar and cortical dynamics during movement were not dominated by PN stimulation, but altered in line with behavioral changes. These results suggest that the cortico-cerebellar loop fine-tunes motor commands during skilled reaching.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

The cortical dynamics orchestrating skilled prehension

Skillful control of movement is central to our ability to sense and manipulate the world. A large body of work in nonhuman primates has demonstrated that motor cortex provides flexible, time-varying activity patterns that control the arm during reaching and grasping. Previous studies have suggested that these patterns are generated by strong local recurrent dynamics operating autonomously from inputs during movement execution. An alternative possibility is that motor cortex requires coordination with upstream brain regions throughout the entire movement in order to yield these patterns. Here, we developed an experimental preparation in the mouse to directly test these possibilities using optogenetics and electrophysiology during a skilled reach-to-grab-to-eat task. To validate this preparation, we first established that a specific, time-varying pattern of motor cortical activity was required to produce coordinated movement. Next, in order to disentangle the contribution of local recurrent motor cortical dynamics from external input, we optogenetically held the recurrent contribution constant, then observed how motor cortical activity recovered following the end of this perturbation. Both the neural responses and hand trajectory varied from trial to trial, and this variability reflected variability in external inputs. To directly probe the role of these inputs, we used optogenetics to perturb activity in the thalamus. Thalamic perturbation at the start of the trial prevented movement initiation, and perturbation at any stage of the movement prevented progression of the hand to the target; this demonstrates that input is required throughout the movement. By comparing motor cortical activity with and without thalamic perturbation, we were able to estimate the effects of external inputs on motor cortical population activity. Thus, unlike pattern-generating circuits that are local and autonomous, such as those in the spinal cord that generate left-right alternation during locomotion, the pattern generator for reaching and grasping is distributed across multiple, strongly-interacting brain regions.

neuroscience↗