Biology subjects

Sasaki, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Sasaki, R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Modulation of I-wave generating pathways with repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: A TMS-EEG study

ObjectivesRepetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) at indirect (I) wave intervals increases motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by TMS to primary motor cortex (M1). However, the effects of iTMS at early and late intervals on the plasticity of specific I-wave circuits remains unclear. The current study therefore aimed to assess how the timing of iTMS influences intracortical excitability within early and late I-wave circuits. To investigate the cortical effects of iTMS more directly, changes due to the intervention were also assessed using combined TMS-electroencephalography (EEG). Material and MethodsEighteen young adults (24.6 {+/-} 4.2 years) participated in four sessions in which iTMS targeting early (1.5 ms interval; iTMS1.5) or late (4.0 ms interval; iTMS4.0) I-waves was applied over M1. Neuroplasticity was assessed using both posterior-to-anterior (PA) and anterior-to-posterior (AP) stimulus directions to record MEPs and TEPs before and after iTMS. SICF at inter-stimulus intervals of 1.5 and 4.0 ms was also used to index I-wave activity. ResultsMEP amplitude was increased after iTMS (P < 0.01) and this was greater for PA responses (P < 0.01), but not different between iTMS intervals (P = 0.9). Irrespective of iTMS interval and coil current, SICF was facilitated after the intervention (P < 0.01). While the N45 produced by AP stimulation was reduced by iTMS1.5 (P = 0.04), no other changes in TEP amplitude were observed. ConclusionThe timing of iTMS failed to influence which I-wave circuits were potentiated by the intervention. In contrast, reductions in the N45 suggest that the neuroplastic effects of iTMS may include disinhibition of intracortical inhibitory processes.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Utilising TMS-EEG to assess the response to cerebellar-brain inhibition

BackgroundCerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm indexing excitability of cerebellar projections to motor cortex (M1). Stimulation involved with CBI is often considered to be uncomfortable, and alternative ways to index connectivity between cerebellum and the cortex would be valuable. Utilising electroencephalography in conjunction with TMS (combined TMS-EEG) to record the response to CBI has the potential to achieve this, but has not been attempted previously. ObjectiveTo investigate the utility of TMS-EEG for characterising cerebellar-cortical interactions recruited by CBI. MethodsA total of 33 volunteers (25.7 {+/-} 4.9 years, 20 females) participated across three experiments. These investigated EEG responses to CBI induced with a figure-of-eight (F8; experiment 1) or double cone (DC; experiment 2) conditioning coil over cerebellum, in addition to multisensory sham stimulation (experiment 3). ResultsBoth F8 and DC coils suppressed early TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) produced by TMS to M1 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the TEP produced by CBI stimulation was related to the motor inhibitory response to CBI recorded in a hand muscle (P < 0.05), but only when using the DC coil. Multisensory sham stimulation failed to modify the M1 TEP. ConclusionsCerebellar conditioning produced changes in the M1 TEP that were not apparent following sham stimulation, and that were related to the motor inhibitory effects of CBI. Our findings therefore suggest it is possible to index the response to CBI using TMS-EEG. In addition, while both F8 and DC coils appear to recruit cerebellar projections, the nature of these may be different.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.

While previous research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest that cerebellum (CB) influences the neuroplastic response of primary motor cortex (M1), the role of different indirect (I) wave inputs in M1 mediating this interaction remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to assess how CB influences neuroplasticity of early and late I-wave circuits. 22 young adults (22 {+/-} 2.7 years) participated in 3 sessions in which I-wave periodicity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTMS) was applied over M1 during concurrent application of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over CB (tDCSCB). In each session, iTMS either targeted early I-waves (1.5 ms interval; iTMS1.5), late I-waves (4.5 ms interval; iTMS4.5), or had no effect (variable interval; iTMSSham). Changes due to the intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude using TMS protocols measuring corticospinal excitability (MEP1mV) and the strength of CB-M1 connections (CBI). In addition, we indexed I-wave activity using short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and low-intensity single-pulse TMS applied with posterior-anterior (MEPPA) and anterior-posterior (MEPAP) current directions. Following both active iTMS sessions, there was no change in MEP1mV, CBI or SICF (all P > 0.05), suggesting that tDCSCB broadly disrupted the excitatory response that is normally seen following iTMS. However, although MEPAP also failed to facilitate after the intervention (P > 0.05), MEPPA potentiated following both active iTMS sessions (both P < 0.05). This differential response between current directions suggests that the disruptive effects of CB modulation on M1 plasticity may be selectively mediated by AP-sensitive circuits (also likely recruited with MEP1mV, CBI, and SICF).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Modulation of motor cortex plasticity by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals is influenced by intracortical excitability

The late indirect (I) waves recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) can be modulated using I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the response to iTMS is influenced by different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) targeting late I-waves, and whether these responses were associated with individual variations in intracortical excitability. 17 young (27.2 {+/-} 6.4 years, 12 females) healthy adults received iTMS at late I-wave intervals (4.0, 4.5 & 5.0 ms) in three separate sessions. Changes due to each intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) using both posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS current directions. Changes in MEP amplitude and SICF were influenced by iTMS ISI, with the greatest facilitation for ISIs at 4 and 5 ms with PA TMS, and 4 ms with AP TMS. Maximum SICF at baseline (irrespective of ISI) was associated with increased iTMS response, but only for PA stimulation. These results suggest that modifying iTMS parameters targeting late I-waves can influence M1 plasticity. They also suggest that maximum SICF may be a means by which responders to iTMS targeting the late I-waves could be identified.

neuroscience↗