Sannamath, S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Contextual Inference Drives Motor Memory Protection and Disruption

Newly acquired memories are initially fragile and are consolidated into long-term memory over time. Although consolidated memories were once thought to be resistant to interference, accumulating evidence shows that memory reactivation renders them transiently labile, making them susceptible to modification or interference before reconsolidation. Crucially, however, there is substantial variation in whether reactivated memories are disrupted by new information, remain protected from it, or even strengthened by it. The factors that guide this modification are largely unknown. To systematically investigate this, we examined motor memory interference using a classic A-B-A visuomotor rotation paradigm. Participants adapted to a 30-degree clockwise rotation (A) on Day1. On Day2, an interfering 30-degree counter-clockwise rotation (B) was introduced under varied conditions: directly without reactivation, after brief reactivation of A, after expression of A without feedback, or following a gradual transition from A to B. The final experiment used explicit contextual cues (a secondary follow-through target) to distinguish A and B trials. Contrary to the simple prediction that reactivation should increase vulnerability to interference, reactivating the original memory before introducing interference protected it, as evidenced by significant savings during relearning on Day3. In contrast, introducing interference directly, without reactivation, disrupted the original memory. This protection was consistent with a contextual-inference account: the large sensory prediction error experienced during the abrupt transition from A to B served as a latent contextual cue, signaling a new context and thereby shielding the original memory from being overwritten. Eliminating this prediction error through an immediate washout session with a similar error profile or through a gradual A-to-B transition abolished the protective effect and disrupted the original memory. Furthermore, when explicit contextual cues distinguished the two perturbations, memories were protected even in the absence of a salient prediction error. Our findings are consistent with a contextual inference account in which the fate of a consolidated memory, whether it is modified or protected, is shaped by the availability of explicit cues or latent signals such as sensory prediction error at the time when interference is introduced.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Contextual Cues and Transition Statistics Drive Expression of Competing Motor Memories

Learning multiple motor skills without interference and expressing the correct one in a changing environment is a fundamental challenge. Contextual cues are known to help separate these memories, but how they interact during retrieval is not well understood. We investigated how the stability, recency, and transitional statistics of learning environments influence this process. Across six visuomotor adaptation experiments, participants learned opposing rotations (Tasks A and B) tagged with distinct contextual cues under different schedules (blocked or interleaved) and were tested in stable or dynamic environments. We found that while contextual cues can successfully separate memories, expression is systematically biased by learned transition statistics: towards more stable memories after imbalanced training, and towards more recent memories when stabilities are matched. Critically, when the stable statistics of training mismatched the volatile statistics of testing, cue-based retrieval collapsed, and behavior was dominated by these stability or recency biases. Conversely, learning in a high-entropy, interleaved environment enabled precise, cue-appropriate expression regardless of the testing schedule. These results demonstrate that memory retrieval is not cue-driven but arises from an arbitration process between cues and transition priors. Our findings reveal that memory retrieval involves weighting sensory information against latent priors derived from the history of context transitions. This work provides a unifying theoretical framework for understanding adaptive memory expression, positing that the brain leverages the learned statistical structure of the environment to infer which memory to recall, thereby balancing cue-driven selection with the stability and predictability of past experience. This principle offers a unifying explanation for interference, spontaneous recovery, and the benefits of variable practice, providing a more holistic model of adaptive motor behavior. Statement of SignificanceHow does a tennis player instantly switch between a forehand and a backhand? Our work reveals a fundamental principle of how the brain organizes and retrieves memories. We demonstrate that recalling a skill is not just about recognizing a contextual cue, but about an internal process of integrating that cue with the learned statistics of the environment, such as the stability and recency of past experiences. This finding provides a unifying framework for phenomena like interference and spontaneous recovery. It has significant implications for designing more effective training in sports and rehabilitation, where structuring practice around environmental statistics can optimize learning and promote flexible skill application.

neuroscience↗