Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sanjeev, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Sanjeev, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms

Cells coordinate diverse biological processes through interactions among thousands of molecules, but mapping these interactions comprehensively and systematically remains an open problem. Pathway reconstruction algorithms address this problem by linking molecules of interest, identified from high-throughput omics experiments, using prior knowledge encoded as background interaction networks. This process recovers intermediate molecules and interactions that were not directly measured in the experimental data but plausibly connect the observed molecules. It generates testable hypotheses about interactions that drive cell behavior and informs the choice of follow-up experiments. Many algorithms have been created over decades, each optimizing different computational objectives and relying on different assumptions. The resulting heterogeneity has made benchmarking challenging, limiting systematic comparisons. Therefore, selecting an algorithm for a given biological context remains a non-trivial and poorly informed task. This registered report presents a large-scale benchmark of pathway reconstruction algorithms, evaluating 14 algorithms across 822 datasets from four biological settings. To enable this benchmark, we introduce Signaling Pathway Reconstruction Analysis Streamliner (SPRAS), which standardizes algorithm inputs, outputs, and execution into a formal framework, enabling systematic comparison that was previously infeasible. We will assess each algorithm on reconstruction performance against gold standard pathways, algorithm similarity, and computational performance across different biological contexts. Together, these evaluations will provide quantitative evidence for understanding pathway reconstruction algorithm behavior and guiding algorithm selection.

bioinformatics↗

Uncovering Conceptual Biases in DNA Stabilization: A Student-Led Investigation

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) stands as one of the most foundational concepts in life sciences, essential for students to master. However, when surveyed about the forces that stabilize the double-stranded DNA structure, many students exhibited a conceptual bias-- favoring base pairing as the primary stabilizing force, while overlooking the equally critical role of base stacking interactions. To investigate the origins of this misconception, students conducted a comprehensive analysis of 35 widely used textbooks. Their findings revealed that one-third of these texts explicitly emphasized base pairing as the sole stabilizing force in their written content. Furthermore, two-thirds of the textbook contained illustrations that reinforced this bias, visually highlighting base pairing while neglecting base stacking. Recognizing this bias, students embarked on a literature review to gain a more accurate and nuanced understanding of DNA stabilization. Through this research, we identified three concept areas--DNA structure and function, environmental effects on DNA, and DNA-protein interactions--to illustrate how base pairing and base stacking work in concert to stabilize the antiparallel double helical structure of DNA. This interplay between base pairing and base stacking is crucial not only for the structural integrity of DNA, but also for its biological functionality. By addressing this conceptual bias, we aim to promote a more balanced and scientifically accurate representation of DNA stabilization in educational materials.

scientific communication and education↗

Effect of muscarinic blockade on the speed of attention shifting and learning

The study aimed to investigate to what extent blockade of muscarinic receptors affects the speed of endogenous versus exogenous attentional shift times, and how it affects learning induced improvements of attention shift times. Subjects viewed an array of 10 moving clocks and reported the time a clock indicated when cued. Target clocks were indicated by peripheral or central cues, including conditions of pre-cuing. This allowed assessing shift times when attention was pre-allocated, when peripheral cues triggered exogenous attention shifts, and when central cues triggered endogenous attention shifts. In study 1, each subject participated in 2 sessions (scopolamine/placebo), whereby the order of drug intake was counterbalanced across subjects, and subjects were blinded to conditions. Scopolamine/placebo was administered before a psychophysical experiment was conducted. In study 2, the effect of muscarinic blockade on learning induced improvements of attention shift times was investigated. Here scopolamine/placebo was administered immediately after the first (of two) psychophysical sessions, whereby a given subject either received scopolamine or placebo pills. Confirming previous results, we show that pre-cuing resulted in the fastest shift times, followed by exogenous cuing, with endogenous attentional shifts being slowest. Scopolamine application increased attentional shift times across all 3 conditions compared to placebo, but in a dose dependent manner. Additionally, blockade of muscarinic receptors immediately after the first session reduced learning dependent improvement of attention shift times. These results demonstrate that muscarinic receptors play an important role in attention shifting, and they contribute to learning of attention shifting.

neuroscience↗

Effect of alcohol on the speed of shifting endogenous and exogenous attention

The study aimed to investigate to what extent acute moderate doses of alcohol affect the speed of endogenous versus exogenous attentional shift times. Subjects viewed an array of 10 moving clocks and reported the time a clock indicated when cued. Target clocks were indicated by peripheral or central cues, including conditions of pre-cuing. This allowed assessing shift times when attention was pre-allocated, when peripheral cues triggered exogenous attention shifts, and when central cues triggered endogenous attention shifts. Each subject participated in 2 sessions (alcohol/placebo), whereby the order of drug intake was counterbalanced across subjects, and subjects were blinded to conditions. Confirming previous results, we show that pre-cuing resulted in the fastest shift times, followed by exogenous cuing, with endogenous attentional shifts being slowest. Alcohol increased attentional shift times across all 3 conditions compared to placebo. Thus, the detrimental effects of alcohol on attentional shift times did not depend on the type of attention probed.

neuroscience↗