Sanchez-Mut, J. V. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2021

The HDAC inhibitor CI-994 acts as a molecular memory aid by facilitating synaptic and intra-cellular communication after learning

Long-term memory formation relies on synaptic plasticity, activity-dependent transcription and epigenetic modifications. Multiple studies have shown that HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) treatments can enhance individual aspects of these processes, and thereby act as putative cognitive enhancers. However, their mode of action is not fully understood. In particular, it is unclear how systemic application of HDACis, which are devoid of substrate specificity, can target pathways that promote memory formation. In this study, we explore the electrophysiological, transcriptional and epigenetic responses that are induced by CI-994, a class I HDAC inhibitor, combined with contextual fear conditioning (CFC) in mice. We show that CI-994-mediated improvement of memory formation is accompanied by enhanced long-term potentiation in the hippocampus, a brain region recruited by CFC, but not in the striatum, a brain region not primarily implicated in contextual memory formation. Furthermore, using a combination of bulk and single cell RNA sequencing, we find that synaptic plasticity-promoting gene expression cascades are more strongly engaged in the hippocampus than in the striatum, but only when HDACi treatment co-occurred with CFC, and not by either treatment alone. Lastly, using ChIP-sequencing, we show that the combined action of HDACi application and conditioning is required to elicit enhancer histone acetylation in pathways that may underlie improved memory performance. Together, our results indicate that systemic HDACi administration amplifies brain-region specific processes that are naturally induced by learning. These findings shed light onto the mode of action of HDACis as cognitive enhancers. Significance StatementMemory formation relies on a plethora of functions, including epigenetic modifications. Over the past years, multiple studies have indicated the potential of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) to act as cognitive enhancers, but their mode of action is not fully understood. Here, we tested whether HDACi treatment improves memory formation via "cognitive epigenetic priming", stipulating that HDACis - without inherent target specificity - specifically enhance plasticity-related processes. We found that combining HDACi with fear learning, but not either treatment alone, enhances synaptic plasticity as well as memory-promoting transcriptional signaling in the hippocampus, a brain area known to be recruited by fear learning, but not in others. These results lend experimental support to the theory of "cognitive epigenetic priming".

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

MeCP2-E1 isoform is a dynamically expressed, weakly DNA-bound protein with different protein and DNA interactions compared to MeCP2-E2

MeCP2 - a chromatin-binding protein associated with Rett syndrome - has two main isoforms, MeCP2-E1 and MeCP2-E2, with 96% amino acid identity differing in a few N-terminal amino acid residues. Previous studies have shown brain region-specific expression of these isoforms which, in addition to their different cellular localization and differential expression during brain development, suggest they may also have non-overlapping molecular mechanisms. However, differential functions of MeCP2-E1 and E2 remain largely unexplored. Here, we show that the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MeCP2-E1 and E2 modulate the ability of the methyl binding domain (MBD) to interact with DNA as well as influencing the turnover rates, binding dynamics, response to nuclear depolarization, and circadian oscillations of the two isoforms. Our proteomics data indicate that both isoforms exhibit unique interacting protein partners. Moreover, genome-wide analysis using ChIP-seq provide evidence for a shared as well as a specific regulation of different sets of genes. Our findings provide insight into the functional complexity of MeCP2 by dissecting differential aspects of its two isoforms.\n\nSignificanceWhether the two E1 and E2 isoforms of MeCP2 have different structural and/or functional implications has been highly controversial and is not well known. Here we show that the relatively short N-terminal sequence variation between the two isoforms impinges them with an important DNA binding difference. Moreover, MeCP2-E1 and E2 exhibit a different cellular dynamic behavior and have some distinctive interacting partners. In addition, while sharing genome occupancy they specifically bind to several distinctive genes.

biochemistry↗