Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Saltzman, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Saltzman, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Determining the Role of Environmental Covariates on Planktivorous Elasmobranch Population Trends within an Isolated Marine Protected Area

Several studies have found predictable relationships between the behavior of planktivores and environmental conditions, suggesting that planktivores may be especially sensitive to environmental change. However, many studies to date are based on limited observations, include few of the many environmental covariates which could influence planktivores, and do not occur over long enough time periods to make inferences about the potential effects of environmental change. As such, long term datasets on planktivores are necessary to disentangle the potential impacts of oceanographic and environmental variability. In this study, to elucidate the relationship between plankivores and environmental variability, we use data obtained over the last 28 years by a small group of divemasters at Cocos Island, Costa Rica, one of the oldest marine reserves in the world. We found that, in general, for planktivorous elasmobranchs, several environmental variables, such as, chlorophyll A, lunar cycle, and salinity have clear influences on their occurrence and relative abundances. We found that in the phases of lower illuminations, there were significant increases in abundance of mobula rays. Specifically, a 0.10 mg/m3increase in Chlorophyll A correlated with 26% decrease in whale sharks. We found that increases in salinity correlated with increases in mobula abundance but did not correlate with observations of mantas or whale sharks. We also found that omission of environmental covariates can lead to overprediction and underprediction of relative abundances. Our findings highlight the need to take environmental conditions into account when evaluating the efficacy of marine protection.

ecology↗

Sharks, Lies, and Videotape: A content analysis of 32 years of Shark Week documentaries

Despite evidence of their importance to marine ecosystems, at least 25% of all chondrichthyan species are estimated or assessed as threatened with extinction. In addition to the logistical difficulties of effectively conserving wide-ranging marine species, shark conservation is believed to have been hindered in the past by public perceptions of sharks as dangerous to humans. Shark Week is a high-profile, international programming event that has potentially enormous influence on public perceptions of sharks, shark research, shark researchers, and shark conservation. However, Shark Week has received regular criticism for poor factual accuracy, fearmongering, bias, and inaccurate representations of science and scientists. This research analyzes the content and titles of Shark Week episodes across its entire 32 years of programming to determine if there are trends in species covered, research techniques featured, expert identity, conservation messaging, type of programming, and portrayal of sharks. We analyzed titles from 272 episodes (100%) of Shark Week programming and the content of all available (201; 73.9%) episodes. Our data demonstrate that the majority of episodes are not focused on shark bites, although such shows are common and many Shark Week programs frame sharks around fear, risk, and adrenaline. While anecdotal descriptions of disproportionate attention to particular charismatic species (e.g. great whites, bull sharks, and tiger sharks) are accurate and supported by data, 79 shark species have been featured briefly at least once. Shark Weeks depictions of research and of scientists are biased towards a small set of (typically visual and expensive) research methodologies and (mostly white, mostly male) scientists, including presentation of many white male non-scientists as experts. While sharks are more often portrayed negatively than positively, limited conservation messaging does appear in 53% of episodes analyzed. Results suggest that as a whole, while Shark Week is likely contributing to the collective perception of sharks as monsters, even relatively small alterations to programming decisions could substantially improve the presentation of sharks and shark science and conservation issues.

scientific communication and education↗