Biology subjects

Salit, M. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Salit, M. L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Assembly and Annotation of an Ashkenazi Human Reference Genome

Here we describe the assembly and annotation of the genome of an Ashkenazi individual and the creation of a new, population-specific human reference genome. This genome is more contiguous and more complete than GRCh38, the latest version of the human reference genome, and is annotated with highly similar gene content. The Ashkenazi reference genome, Ash1, contains 2,973,118,650 nucleotides as compared to 2,937,639,212 in GRCh38. Annotation identified 20,157 protein-coding genes, of which 19,563 are >99% identical to their counterparts on GRCh38. Most of the remaining genes have small differences. 40 of the protein-coding genes in GRCh38 are missing from Ash1; however, all of these genes are members of multi-gene families for which Ash1 contains other copies. 11 genes appear on different chromosomes from their homologs in GRCh38. Alignment of DNA sequences from an unrelated Ashkenazi individual to Ash1 identified ~1 million fewer homozygous SNPs than alignment of those same sequences to the more-distant GRCh38 genome, illustrating one of the benefits of population-specific reference genomes.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

High-coverage, long-read sequencing of Han Chinese trio reference samples.

Single-molecule long-read sequencing datasets were generated for a son-father-mother trio of Han Chinese descent that is part of the Genome In a Bottle (GIAB) consortium portfolio. The dataset was generated using the Pacific Biosciences Sequel System. The son and each parent were sequenced to an average coverage of 60 and 30, respectively, with N50 subread lengths between 16 and 18 kb. Raw reads and reads aligned to both the GRCh37 and GRCh38 are available at the NCBI GIAB ftp site (ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/giab/ftp/data/ChineseTrio/) and the raw read data is archived in NCBI SRA (SRX4739017, SRX4739121, and SRX4739122). This dataset is available for anyone to develop and evaluate long-read bioinformatics methods.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Assessing 16S marker gene survey data analysis methods using mixtures of human stool sample DNA extracts.

BackgroundAnalysis of 16S rRNA marker-gene surveys, used to characterize prokaryotic microbial communities, may be performed by numerous bioinformatic pipelines and downstream analysis methods. However, there is limited guidance on how to decide between methods, appropriate data sets and statistics for assessing these methods are needed. We developed a mixture dataset with real data complexity and an expected value for assessing 16S rRNA bioinformatic pipelines and downstream analysis methods. We generate an assessment dataset using a two-sample titration mixture design. The sequencing data were processed using multiple bioinformatic pipelines, i) DADA2 a sequence inference method, ii) Mothur a de novo clustering method, and iii) QIIME with open-reference clustering. The mixture dataset was used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess count tables generated using the pipelines.\n\nResultsThe qualitative assessment was used to evalute features only present in unmixed samples and titrations. The abundance of Mothur and QIIME features specific to unmixed samples and titrations were explained by sampling alone. However, for DADA2 over a third of the unmixed sample and titration specific feature abundance could not be explained by sampling alone. The quantitative assessment evaluated pipeline performance by comparing observed to expected relative and differential abundance values. Overall the observed relative abundance and differential abundance values were consistent with the expected values. Though outlier features were observed across all pipelines.\n\nConclusionsUsing a novel mixture dataset and assessment methods we quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated count tables generated using three bioinformatic pipelines. The dataset and methods developed for this study will serve as a valuable community resource for assessing 16S rRNA marker-gene survey bioinformatic methods.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Summarizing Performance for Genome Scale Measurement of miRNA: Reference Samples and Metrics

BackgroundThe potential utility of microRNA as biomarkers for early detection of cancer and other diseases is being investigated with genome-scale profiling of differentially expressed microRNA. Processes for measurement assurance are critical components of genome-scale measurements. Here, we evaluated the utility of a set of total RNA samples, designed with between-sample differences in the relative abundance of miRNAs, as process controls.\n\nResultsThree pure total human RNA samples (brain, liver, and placenta) and two different mixtures of these components were evaluated as measurement assurance control samples on multiple measurement systems at multiple sites and over multiple rounds. In silico modeling of mixtures provided benchmark values for comparison with physical mixtures. Biomarker development laboratories using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or genome-scale hybridization assays participated in the study and returned data from the samples using their routine workflows. Multiplexed and single assay reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was used to confirm in silico predicted sample differences. Data visualizations and summary metrics for genome-scale miRNA profiling assessment were developed using this dataset, and a range of performance was observed. These metrics have been incorporated into an online data analysis pipeline and provide a convenient dashboard view of results from experiments following the described design. The website also serves as a repository for the accumulation of performance values providing new participants in the project an opportunity to learn what may be achievable with similar measurement processes.\n\nConclusionsThe set of reference samples used in this study provides benchmark values suitable for assessing genome-scale miRNA profiling processes. Incorporation of these metrics into an online resource allows laboratories to periodically evaluate their performance and assess any changes introduced into their measurement process.

genomics↗