Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Saleri, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Saleri, C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimal foraging requires coordinating decisions with movements

Decision-making and motor execution are both constrained by time and energy, and their optimization depends on cost-benefit trade-offs. While many studies suggest that decisions and movements follow common economic principles and can be jointly regulated to maximize reward rate, recent findings indicate that these two processes can also be decoupled or modulated in compensatory ways. This variability raises the question of whether decision-action coordination reflects an optimal strategy aimed at maximizing reward rate, or rather a flexible but suboptimal adaptation to contextual constraints. To address this issue, we trained three macaque monkeys to perform a reaching-based foraging task. The observed adjustments in decision-action coordination of the three monkeys are consistent with the pursuit of a strategy that approximates the theoretical optimum of reward intake rate at the single trial level. The present findings indicate, both behaviorally and theoretically, that coordination between decision and movement is required to optimize behavior in economic terms.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Evidence for interacting but decoupled controls of decisions and movements in non-human primates

Many recent studies indicate that control of decisions and actions is integrated during interactive behavior. Among these, several carried out in humans and monkeys conclude that there is a co-regulation of choices and movements. Another perspective, based on human data only, proposes a decoupled control of decision duration and movement speed, allowing for instance to trade decision duration for movement duration when time pressure increases. Crucially, it is not currently known whether this ability to flexibly dissociate decision duration from movement speed is specific to humans, whether it can vary depending on the context in which a task is performed, and whether it is stable over time. These are important questions to address, especially to rely on monkey electrophysiology to infer the neural mechanisms of decision-action coordination in humans. To do so, we trained two macaque monkeys in a perceptual decision-making task and analyzed data collected over multiple behavioral sessions. Our findings reveal a strong and complex relationship between decision duration and movement vigor. Decision duration and action duration can co-vary but also "compensate" each other. Such integrated but decoupled control of decisions and actions aligns with recent studies in humans, validating the monkey model in electrophysiology as a means of inferring neural mechanisms in humans. Crucially, we demonstrate for the first time that this control can evolve with experience, in an adapted manner. Together, the present findings contribute to deepening our understanding of the integrated control of decisions and actions during interactive behavior. New & noteworthyThe mechanism by which the integrated control of decisions and actions occurs, coupled or interactive but decoupled, is debated. In the present study, we show in monkeys that decisions and actions influence each other in a decoupled way. For the first time, we also demonstrate that this control can evolve depending the subjects experience, allowing to trade movement time for decision time and limit the temporal discounting of reward value.

animal behavior and cognition↗