Sakhnevych, S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2024

Viral mimicry redirects immunosuppressed colorectal tumour landscapes towards a proinflammatory and CMS1-like regenerative state

In colorectal cancer (CRC), tumours classifier as consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) have the worst prognosis and derive negligible benefit from chemotherapy. We previously described how repressed interferon-related signalling is associated with increased relapse in CMS4 tumours. Although the viral mimetic poly(I:C) can reduce liver metastasis in vivo, the initial phenotypic changes that underpin its anti-metastatic response remain poorly described, particularly in the immunosuppressed CMS4 tumour microenvironment. Here we characterise lineage-specific anti-metastatic responses induced by poly(I:C), including acute macrophage polarisation and a novel CMS1-like regenerative stem cell state, which drive pro-inflammatory microenvironmental changes in CRC. These insights enabled the development of tractable biomarkers that identify an "immune-warm" patient subset most likely to respond to poly(I:C), enriched for mismatch-repair proficient (pMMR), anti-inflammatory macrophages and CMS4-like features. The viral mimetic poly(I:C) offers a tailored treatment option for CMS4 tumours, by reprogramming stem cell states and activation of an innate-adaptive anti-metastatic response.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Biological misinterpretation of transcriptional signatures in tumour samples can unknowingly undermine mechanistic understanding and faithful alignment with preclinical data

Precise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GESs) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signalling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumour samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumour stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signalling. Using colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single cell RNAseq and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely-used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumour tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets. Findings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumour models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment. As such, efforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples.

cancer biology↗