Biology subjects

Sakai, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Sakai, Y..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias

When collecting large neuroimaging data associated with psychiatric disorders, images must be acquired from multiple sites because of the limited capacity of a single site. However, site differences represent the greatest barrier when acquiring multi-site neuroimaging data. We utilized a traveling-subject dataset in conjunction with a multi-site, multi-disorder dataset to demonstrate that site differences are composed of biological sampling bias and engineering measurement bias. Effects on resting-state functional MRI connectivity because of both bias types were greater than or equal to those because of psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, our findings indicated that each site can sample only from among a subpopulation of participants. This result suggests that it is essential to collect large neuroimaging data from as many sites as possible to appropriately estimate the distribution of the grand population. Finally, we developed a novel harmonization method that removed only the measurement bias by using traveling-subject dataset and achieved the reduction of the measurement bias by 29% and the improvement of the signal to noise ratios by 40%.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity

Individual differences in cognitive function have been shown to correlate with brain-wide functional connectivity, suggesting a common foundation relating connectivity to cognitive function across healthy populations. However, it remains unknown whether this relationship is preserved in cognitive deficits seen in a range of psychiatric disorders. Using machine learning methods, we built a prediction model of working memory function from whole-brain functional connectivity among a healthy population (N = 17, age 19-24 years). We applied this normative model to a series of independently collected resting state functional connectivity datasets (N = 968), involving multiple psychiatric diagnoses, sites, ages (18-65 years), and ethnicities. We found that predicted working memory ability was correlated with actually measured working memory performance in both schizophrenia patients (partial correlation,{rho} = 0.25, P = 0.033, N = 58) and a healthy population (partial correlation,{rho} = 0.11, P = 0.0072, N = 474). Moreover, the model predicted diagnosis-specific severity of working memory impairments in schizophrenia (N = 58, with 60 controls), major depressive disorder (N = 77, with 63 controls), obsessive-compulsive disorder (N = 46, with 50 controls), and autism spectrum disorder (N = 69, with 71 controls) with effect sizes g = -0.68, -0.29, -0.19, and 0.09, respectively. According to the model, each diagnosiss working memory impairment resulted from the accumulation of distinct functional connectivity differences that characterizes each diagnosis, including both diagnosis-specific and diagnosis-invariant functional connectivity differences. Severe working memory impairment in schizophrenia was related not only with fronto-parietal, but also widespread network changes. Autism spectrum disorder showed greater negative connectivity that related to improved working memory function, suggesting that some non-normative functional connections can be behaviorally advantageous. Our results suggest that the relationship between brain connectivity and working memory function in healthy populations can be generalized across multiple psychiatric diagnoses. This approach may shed new light on behavioral variances in psychiatric disease and suggests that whole-brain functional connectivity can provide an individual quantitative behavioral profile in a range of psychiatric disorders.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

A common neural network among state, trait, and pathological anxiety from whole-brain functional connectivity

Anxiety is one of the most common mental states of humans. Although it drives us to avoid frightening situations and to achieve our goals, it may also impose significant suffering and burden if it becomes extreme. Because we experience anxiety in a variety of forms, previous studies investigated neural substrates of anxiety in a variety of ways. These studies revealed that individuals with high state, trait, or pathological anxiety showed altered neural substrates. However, no studies have directly investigated whether the different dimensions of anxiety share a common neural substrate, despite its theoretical and practical importance. Here, we investigated a neural network of anxiety shared by different dimensions of anxiety in a unified analytical framework using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We analyzed different datasets in a single scale, which was defined by an anxiety-related neural network derived from whole brain. Through the fMRI task for provoking anxiety, we found a common neural network of state anxiety across participants (1,638 trials obtained from 10 participants). Then, using the resting-state fMRI in combination with the participants trait anxiety scale (879 participants from the Human Connectome Project), we demonstrated that trait anxiety also shared the same neural network as state anxiety. Furthermore, the common neural network between state and trait anxiety could detect patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which is characterized by pathological anxiety-driven behaviors (174 participants from multi-site datasets). Our findings provide direct evidence that different dimensions of anxiety are not completely independent but have a substantial biological inter-relationship. Our results also provide a biologically defined dimension of anxiety, which may promote further investigation of various human characteristics, including psychiatric disorders, from the perspective of anxiety.

neuroscience↗