Biology subjects

Saiz, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Saiz, H..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Lonely plants in arid land are functionally hyperdiverse

In Gross et al.1 we produced the largest ever standardized dryland plant trait database including 133,769 trait measurements from 301 perennial plant species surveyed across 326 plots and six continents. Our findings indicate that arid and hyper-arid drylands act as a global reservoir of plant phenotypic diversity, challenging the common assumption that harsh environmental conditions reduce plant trait diversity. Tordoni et al.2 speculate that the larger phenotypic diversity in harsh environments found in our study is overestimated and misinterpreted. The re-analyses presented here further confirm that the patterns we originally reported are robust, and thus that the concerns from Tordoni et al. are not well-founded and do not apply to our study. We stand for the main conclusions of our study and maintain that lonely plants in arid land are functionally hyperdiverse.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Fast-slow traits predict competition network structure and its response to resources and enemies.

Plants interact in complex networks but how their structure depends on resources, natural enemies and species resource-use strategy remains poorly understood. Here, we quantified competition networks among 18 plants varying in fast-slow strategy, by testing how increased nutrient availability and reduced foliar pathogens affected intra- and inter-specific interactions. Our results show that nitrogen and pathogens altered several aspects of network structure, often in unexpected ways due to fast and slow growing species responding differently. Nitrogen addition increased competition asymmetry in slow growing networks, as expected, but decreased it in fast growing networks. Pathogen reduction made networks more even and less skewed because pathogens targeted weaker competitors. Surprisingly, pathogens and nitrogen dampened each others effect. Our results show that plant growth strategy is key to understand how competition respond to resources and enemies, a prediction from classic theories which has rarely been tested by linking functional traits to competition networks.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Loss of species richness with land use intensity is explained by a reduction in niche differences.

Increases in land use intensity (LUI) reduce species richness. However, we have a poor understanding of how underlying coexistence mechanisms are altered by land use and whether diversity loss occurs due to changes in plant-plant interactions (competition and facilitation) or in species intrinsic growth rates. We expect that LUI could reduce stabilizing niche differences and the indirect interactions that promote coexistence (e.g., intransitivity), while increasing competitive inequalities between species. To test the importance of these different processes, we use 8-yr time series from 150 grasslands differing in LUI to evaluate the role of direct and indirect interactions in promoting coexistence between 50 plant species. We show that LUI reduces the number of coexisting species mostly by causing a non-linear reduction in niche differences, rather than by enhancing competitive inequalities. However, surprisingly, niche differences remained important in stabilizing coexistence between those species remaining at high LUI. Indirect interactions were generally less important than direct ones, and played a moderate role in promoting coexistence in smaller assemblages of species at intermediate LUI. Our models could accurately reproduce the decline in diversity seen with LUI, indicating that our time series approach captures the important interactions between species. By analyzing land use effects through recent advances in structural stability applied to community ecology we provide a more mechanistic understanding of its effects. Our results highlight the importance of identifying the niche differences that are lost with increasing LUI, to better predict and manage effects of land use on biodiversity. Significant statementHuman land use is a major threat to grassland biodiversity. Grasslands with high rates of fertilization, grazing and mowing, contain many fewer plant species. Knowing the underlying causes is necessary for a better management of biodiversity. Here we apply ecological theory to spatiotemporal data on changes in plant abundance in managed grasslands in central Europe. We show that the observed decline in diversity can be explained by how interactions among plant species change with increases in land use intensity. In particular, intensive land use removes the stabilizing effect of self-limiting processes that buffer species against extinction as well as limit competitive dominance. Therefore, actions to promote these stabilizing dynamics among interacting species seem key to restore plant diversity.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

The Structure Of Plant Spatial Association Networks Increases Plant Diversity In Global Drylands

AimDespite their widespread use and value to unveil the complex structure of the interactions within ecological communities and their value to assess the resilience of communities, network analyses have seldom been applied in plant communities. We aim to evaluate how plant-plant interaction networks vary in global drylands, and to assess whether network structure is related to plant diversity in these ecosystems.\n\nLocation185 dryland ecosystems from all continents except Antarctica.\n\nMethodsWe built networks using the local spatial association between all the perennial plant species present in the communities studied, and used structural equation models to evaluate the effect of abiotic factors (including geography, topography, climate and soil conditions) and network structure on plant diversity.\n\nResultsThe structure of plant networks found at most study sites (72%) was not random and presented properties representative of robust systems, such as high link density and structural balance. Moreover, network indices linked to system robustness had a positive and significant effect on plant diversity, sometimes higher that the effect of abiotic factors.\n\nMain conclusionsOur results constitute the first empirical evidence showing the existence of a common network architecture structuring terrestrial plant communities at the global scale, and provide novel evidence of the importance of the network of interactions for the maintenance of biodiversity. Furthermore, they highlight the importance of system-level approaches to explain the diversity and structure of interactions in plant communities, two major drivers of terrestrial ecosystem functioning and resilience against the likely impacts derived from global change.

ecology↗