Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Safari, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Safari, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Development and External Validation of the Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT)

BackgroundAccurate prediction of exacerbation risk enables personalised chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. We developed and validated a generalisable model to predict the individualised rate and severity of COPD exacerbations. MethodsWe pooled data from three COPD trials on patients with a history of exacerbations. We developed a mixed-effect model to predict exacerbations over one-year. Severe exacerbations were those requiring inpatient care. Predictors were a history of exacerbations, age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, domiciliary oxygen therapy, lung function, symptom burden, and current medication use. ECLIPSE, a multicentre cohort study, was used for external validation. ResultsThe development dataset included 2,380 patients (mean 64{middle dot}7 years, 1373 [57{middle dot}7%] men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}42/year, 0{middle dot}29/year [20{middle dot}5%] severe). When validated against all COPD patients in ECLIPSE (n=1819, mean 63{middle dot}3 years, 1186 [65{middle dot}2%] men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}20/year, 0{middle dot}27/year [22{middle dot}2%] severe), the area-under-curve was 0{middle dot}81 (95%CI 0{middle dot}79-0{middle dot}83) for [≥]2 exacerbations and 0{middle dot}77 (95%CI 0{middle dot}74-0{middle dot}80) for [≥]1 severe exacerbation. Predicted rates were 0{middle dot}25/year for severe and 1{middle dot}31/year for all exacerbations, close to the observed rates (0{middle dot}27/year and 1{middle dot}20/year, respectively). In ECLIPSE patients with a prior exacerbation history (n=996, mean 63{middle dot}6 years, 611 (61{middle dot}3%) men, mean exacerbation rate 1{middle dot}82/year, 0{middle dot}40/year [22{middle dot}0%] severe), the area-under-curve was 0{middle dot}73 (95%CI 0{middle dot}70-0{middle dot}76) for [≥]2 exacerbations and 0{middle dot}74 (95%CI 0{middle dot}70-0{middle dot}78) for [≥]1 severe exacerbation. Calibration was accurate for severe exacerbations (predicted=0{middle dot}37/year, observed=0{middle dot}40/year) and all exacerbations (predicted=1{middle dot}80/year, observed=1{middle dot}82/year). The model is accessible at http://resp.core.ubc.ca/ipress/accept. InterpretationThis model can be used as a decision tool to personalise COPD treatment and prevent exacerbations. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSPreventing future exacerbations is a major goal in COPD care. Because of adverse effects, preventative treatments should be reserved for those at a higher risk of future exacerbations. Predicting exacerbation risk in individual patients can guide these clinical decisions. A 2017 systematic review reported that of the 27 identified COPD exacerbation prediction tools, only two had reported external validation and none was ready for clinical implementation. To find the studies that were published afterwards, we searched PubMed for articles on development and validation of COPD exacerbation prediction since 2015, using the search terms "COPD", "exacerbation", "model", and "validation". We included studies that reported prediction of either the risk or the rate of exacerbations and excluded studies that did not report external validation. Our literature search revealed two more prediction models neither of which was deemed generalisable due to lack of methodological rigour, or local and limited nature of the data available to investigators. Added value of this studyWe used data from three randomised trials to develop ACCEPT, a clinical prediction tool based on routinely available predictors for COPD exacerbations. We externally validated ACCEPT in a large, multinational prospective cohort. To our knowledge, ACCEPT is the first COPD exacerbation prediction tool that jointly estimates the individualised rate and severity of exacerbations. Successful external validation of ACCEPT showed that its generalisability can be expanded across geography and beyond the setting of therapeutic trials. ACCEPT is designed to be easily applicable in clinical practice and is readily accessible as a web application. Implications of all the available evidenceCurrent guidelines rely on a history of exacerbations as the sole predictor of future exacerbations. Simple clinical and demographic variables, in aggregate, can be used to predict COPD exacerbations with improved accuracy. ACCEPT enables a more personalised approach to treatment based on routinely collected clinical data by allowing clinicians to objectively differentiate risk profiles of patients with similar exacerbation history. Care providers and patients can use individualised exacerbation risk estimates to decide on preventive therapies based on objectively-established or patient-specific thresholds for treatment benefit and harm. COPD clinical researchers can use this tool to target enriched populations for enrolment in clinical trials.

epidemiology↗

The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States

RationaleDespite effective treatments, a large proportion of asthma patients do not achieve sustained asthma control. The preventable burden associated with lack of proper control is likely taking a high toll at the population level.\n\nObjectiveWe predicted the future health and economic burden of uncontrolled asthma among American adults for the next 20 years.\n\nMethodsWe built a probabilistic model that linked state-specific estimates of population growth, asthma prevalence rates, and distribution of asthma control levels. We conducted several meta-analyses to estimate the adjusted differences in healthcare resource use, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and productivity loss across control levels. We projected, nationally and at the state-level, total direct and indirect costs (in 2018 USD) and QALYs lost due to uncontrolled asthma from 2019 to 2038 in the United States.\n\nMeasurements and Main ResultsOver the next 20 years, the total undiscounted direct costs associated with suboptimal asthma control will be $300.6 billion (95% confidence interval [CI] $190.1 - $411.1). When indirect costs are added, total economic burden will be $963.5 billion (95%CI $664.1 - $1,262.9). American adolescents and adults will lose 15.46 million (95%CI 12.77 million - 18.14 million) QALYs over this period due to suboptimal control of asthma. In state-level analysis, the average 20-year per-capita costs due to uncontrolled asthma ranged from $2,209 (Arkansas) to $6,132 (Connecticut).\n\nConclusionThe burden of uncontrolled asthma will continue to grow for the next twenty years. Strategies towards better management of asthma may be associated with substantial return on investment.

epidemiology↗

The costs of misdiagnosed asthma in a longitudinal study of the general population

ObjectivesA current diagnosis of asthma cannot be objectively confirmed in many patients with physician-diagnosed asthma. Estimates of resource use in overdiagnosed cases of asthma are necessary to measure the burden of overdiagnosis and evaluate strategies to reduce this burden. We assessed the difference in asthma-related healthcare resource use between patients with a confirmed asthma diagnosis and those with asthma ruled out.\n\nDesignPopulation-based prospective cohort study.\n\nSettingParticipants were recruited through random-digit dialling of both landlines and mobile phones in BC, Canada.\n\nParticipantsWe included 345 individuals [≥]12 years of age with a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma which was confirmed by a bronchodilator reversibility or methacholine challenge test at the end of the 12-month follow-up.\n\nPrimary and secondary outcome measuresSelf-reported annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs (2017 Canadian dollars), outpatient physician visits, and medication use from the Canadian healthcare system perspective.\n\nResultsAsthma was ruled out in 86 (24.9%) participants. Average annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs for participants with confirmed asthma were $497.9 (SD $677.9), and $307.7 (SD $424.1) for participants with asthma ruled out. In the adjusted analyses, a confirmed diagnosis was associated with higher direct healthcare costs (Relative Ratio [RR]=1.60, 95%CI 1.14-2.22), increased rate of specialist visits (RR=2.41, 95%CI 1.05-5.40) and reliever medication use (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.09-2.35), but not primary care physician visits (p=0.10) or controller medication use (p=0.11).\n\nConclusionsA quarter of individuals with a physician diagnosis of asthma did not have asthma after objective re-evaluation. These participants still consumed a significant amount of asthma-related healthcare resources. The population-level economic burden of asthma overdiagnosis could be substantial.\n\nStrengths and limitations of this studyO_LIParticipants were recruited through random sampling of the general population in the province of British Columbia.\nC_LIO_LIAsthma diagnosis was confirmed or ruled out using sequential guideline-recommended objective airway tests.\nC_LIO_LIHealthcare resource use was self-reported, potential recall bias may have led to reduced accuracy.\nC_LIO_LIThe study was unable to evaluate the indirect costs of overdiagnosis or the cost-savings from correcting the diagnosis.\nC_LIO_LIThe generalizability of the results may be limited by regional differences in medical costs and practices.\nC_LI

epidemiology↗

Heterogeneity in the respiratory symptoms of patients with mild-moderate COPD

BackgroundThe burden of symptoms varies markedly between patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and is only weakly correlated with lung function impairment. While heterogeneity in lung function decline and exacerbations have been previously studied, the extent of heterogeneity in symptoms and the factors associated with this heterogeneity are not well understood.\n\nMethodsA sample of the general Canadian population [&ge;]40 years with persistent airflow limitation was followed for up to 3 years. Participants reported whether they experienced chronic coughing, phlegm, wheezing, or dyspnea during visits at 18-month intervals. We used mixed-effect logistic regression models (separately for each symptom) to assess overall heterogeneity in the occurrence of symptoms between individuals, and the proportion of variation in symptom burden explained by lung function versus all other clinical characteristics of participants.\n\nResults548 participants (54% male, mean age 67 years) contributed 1,086 visits in total, and 82% of patients reported at least one symptom during follow-up. There was substantial heterogeneity in the individual-specific probabilities for the occurrence of symptoms. This heterogeneity was highest for dyspnea and lowest for phlegm (interquartile range of probabilities: 0.15-0.77 and <0.01-0.53, respectively). FEV1 explained 82% of the variation between individuals in the occurrence of phlegm, 26% for dyspnea, 3% for cough, and <0.1% for wheeze. All clinical characteristics of participants (including FEV1) explained between 86% of heterogeneity in the occurrence of phlegm to <1% for wheeze.\n\nConclusionThere is marked heterogeneity in the burden of respiratory symptoms between COPD patients. The ability of lung function and other commonly measured clinical characteristics to explain this heterogeneity differs between symptoms.

epidemiology↗