The costs of misdiagnosed asthma in a longitudinal study of the general population
ObjectivesA current diagnosis of asthma cannot be objectively confirmed in many patients with physician-diagnosed asthma. Estimates of resource use in overdiagnosed cases of asthma are necessary to measure the burden of overdiagnosis and evaluate strategies to reduce this burden. We assessed the difference in asthma-related healthcare resource use between patients with a confirmed asthma diagnosis and those with asthma ruled out.\n\nDesignPopulation-based prospective cohort study.\n\nSettingParticipants were recruited through random-digit dialling of both landlines and mobile phones in BC, Canada.\n\nParticipantsWe included 345 individuals [≥]12 years of age with a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma which was confirmed by a bronchodilator reversibility or methacholine challenge test at the end of the 12-month follow-up.\n\nPrimary and secondary outcome measuresSelf-reported annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs (2017 Canadian dollars), outpatient physician visits, and medication use from the Canadian healthcare system perspective.\n\nResultsAsthma was ruled out in 86 (24.9%) participants. Average annual asthma-related direct healthcare costs for participants with confirmed asthma were $497.9 (SD $677.9), and $307.7 (SD $424.1) for participants with asthma ruled out. In the adjusted analyses, a confirmed diagnosis was associated with higher direct healthcare costs (Relative Ratio [RR]=1.60, 95%CI 1.14-2.22), increased rate of specialist visits (RR=2.41, 95%CI 1.05-5.40) and reliever medication use (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.09-2.35), but not primary care physician visits (p=0.10) or controller medication use (p=0.11).\n\nConclusionsA quarter of individuals with a physician diagnosis of asthma did not have asthma after objective re-evaluation. These participants still consumed a significant amount of asthma-related healthcare resources. The population-level economic burden of asthma overdiagnosis could be substantial.\n\nStrengths and limitations of this studyO_LIParticipants were recruited through random sampling of the general population in the province of British Columbia.\nC_LIO_LIAsthma diagnosis was confirmed or ruled out using sequential guideline-recommended objective airway tests.\nC_LIO_LIHealthcare resource use was self-reported, potential recall bias may have led to reduced accuracy.\nC_LIO_LIThe study was unable to evaluate the indirect costs of overdiagnosis or the cost-savings from correcting the diagnosis.\nC_LIO_LIThe generalizability of the results may be limited by regional differences in medical costs and practices.\nC_LI