Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sadil, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Sadil, P..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

The State of Motion: Demographic and representational consequences of motion-based exclusion in fMRI

Large-scale neuroimaging datasets are increasingly used to map relationships between brain structure, function, and behavior across the human lifespan. Routinely, analyses exclude participants who moved too much during imaging. While this decision is framed as quality control, it is increasingly recognized that head motion is not randomly distributed across individuals within a study, and so motion-based exclusion may preferentially remove people with particular characteristics relevant to the scientific goals of the study. Here we survey head motion and how it relates to participant characteristics across six large, publicly available datasets spanning nearly the entire human lifespan, namely the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Young Adult, HCP in Development, HCP in Aging, Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study, UK Biobank, and Spatial Topology project. These six datasets comprise more than 50,000 unique participants and 300,000 scans. We further benchmark our findings against motion distributions aggregated by MRIQC across more than 1.5 million scans. Under commonly applied strict exclusion thresholds, large fractions of participants would be removed (exceeding 80 % in the UK Biobank task data), and these removals were demographically structured, disproportionately excluding younger and older participants, those with higher BMI, and those with motion-associated clinical conditions. Respiratory pseudo-motion inflated estimates of head motion in adult cohorts, and applying notch filtering to remove respiratory frequencies from these estimates meaningfully reduced exclusion rates. Exclusion also carried downstream consequences. Strict thresholds reduced statistical power, inflated study costs, and altered the apparent predictability of behavioral phenotypes by removing a non-random, behaviorally distinct subgroup. These findings demonstrate that motion exclusion thresholds are not neutral quality-control decisions but structured selection mechanisms that reshape the composition of neuroimaging samples. We recommend that studies report the demographic characteristics of excluded participants, prefer data-driven censoring methods over fixed motion cutoffs, and clarify the target population while considering appropriate weighting techniques.

neuroscience↗

Intensity-dependent topographical expansion of sensory representations

Neuroimaging studies typically assume that sensory properties are encoded in response magnitude within fixed neural populations. However, this approach does not capture changes in the spatial extent of activation topography, despite growing evidence for its behavioral relevance. Stimulus intensity provides a powerful test case for the role of activation topography as a coding feature because it is a basic, parametrically varying property shared across sensory modalities. Using a Bayes factor-based approach and four functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets (three large-scale datasets [total N = 609] and one precision dataset [>2300 trials]), we tested whether higher-intensity stimulation is associated with expansion of activation topography. Participants received sensory stimuli of varying intensities in somatosensory (heat, laser, tactile), auditory, and visual modalities. High-versus low-intensity painful stimulation consistently produced topographical expansion in areas including the primary somatosensory, posterior midcingulate, primary visual cortices, and cerebellar lobules V and VI. This result replicated across two independent large-scale datasets and within individual participants in the precision dataset. Expansion was also observed for tactile, auditory, and visual stimulation, and its extent correlated with psychophysical discriminability. Topographical expansion involved both the enlargement of already-activated areas and the recruitment of novel regions. These findings establish topographical expansion as a replicable feature of intensity coding, challenging the prevailing assumption of a fixed neural topography.

neuroscience↗

MV-ComBat and MV-CovBat: Multivariate Frameworks for Joint Harmonization of Multi-Metric Neuroimaging Data

Aggregating neuroimaging data across sites and studies is increasingly common, yet site- and scanner-related batch effects can obscure meaningful biological variation and introduce spurious associations. Although ComBat and its extensions are widely used, they are primarily designed for single-metric harmonization. In practice, neuroimaging studies often involve multiple biologically coupled metrics (e.g., cortical thickness, surface area, and gray-matter volume) measured across multiple features (e.g., regional values), with shared covariance structure both within and across metrics. Applying single-metric ComBat independently to each metric ignores these cross-metric dependencies. Using data from the NIH Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) program, we show that batch effects occur not only in means and variances but also in covariance across cortical regions and metrics--relationships that single-metric ComBat does not fully remove. We propose MM-ComBat, a multivariate extension of ComBat that jointly harmonizes multiple metrics by borrowing strength across them, better capturing cross-metric dependence while also improving covariance estimation across features. Because joint harmonization whitens residual covariance toward a standardized baseline, it risks distorting biologically meaningful cross-metric structure when batch effects are moderate. We therefore introduce two complementary formulations: a baseline formulation suited to batch-dominated settings, and a target-covariance formulation that remaps adjusted covariances toward an estimated shared biological structure rather than fully whitening them. Both empirical Bayes (EB) and Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) implementations of MM-ComBat effectively reduce batch effects. In our experiments, EB is more robust to measurement error, whereas MCMC more accurately recovers cross-metric correlations when priors are well specified. Recognizing that batch effects can also affect feature-level covariance, CovBat was recently introduced as an extension of ComBat that harmonizes both first- and second-order moments across sites. We extend CovBat to the multivariate framework as MM-CovBat, which performs a second-stage latent-space harmonization to directly address covariance-related batch effects across features and metrics. Simulations confirm that MM-ComBat improves correlation recovery and better preserves biological effects in the mean structure relative to single-metric ComBat, particularly for moderate-to-strong effects, and that MM-CovBat further improves separation of true biological variation from batch effects when independence assumptions are violated. Together, these methods provide a flexible and unified framework for harmonizing complex, multi-metric neuroimaging data in large-scale, multi-site studies.

neuroscience↗

Image Processing in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Project

The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) project is a large-scale, multi-site initiative aimed at identifying biomarkers and biosignatures that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain. The project is collecting multimodal, longitudinal data from over 2,500 individuals at risk for developing chronic pain after surgery. Here we describe the neuroimaging component of A2CPS, including the acquisition protocols, processing pipelines, and contents of the initial data release. The imaging protocol includes structural, diffusion, resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Data are collected across multiple clinical sites using different scanner manufacturers, with attention to protocol harmonization and quality control. The processing pipeline integrates several established neuroimaging tools to extract potential biomarkers, including measures of brain structure, connectivity, and pain-related neural signatures. The first data release includes pre-surgical imaging data for 595 participants, with high quality ratings across modalities (98.7% of sMRI, 99.8% of dMRI, and 94.6% of fMRI images were rated as acceptable or better). Initial analyses demonstrate expected relationships between brain-derived measures and clinical variables, such as associations between brain age and psychological factors. This dataset represents a valuable resource for both pain research and neuroimaging methods development, with future releases planned to include additional participants and expanded analysis pipelines and processed data derivatives.

neuroscience↗

Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction perception and theory of mind

Social interaction perception and theory of mind (ToM) frequently co-occur, but their commonalities and distinctions at behavioral and neural levels remain unclear. Participants (N = 231) provided moment-by-moment ratings of four text and four audio narratives on social interactions and ToM engagement, which were reliable (split-half r = .98 and .92, respectively) but only modestly correlated (r = .32). In a second sample (N = 90), we analyzed the co-variation between social interaction and ToM ratings and fMRI activity during text and audio narratives. Social interaction and ToM activity maps generalized across modalities (spatial r = .83 and .57, respectively), both with significant, overlapping clusters in canonical mentalizing regions (FDR q < .01). ToM uniquely engaged the lateral occipitotemporal cortex, left anterior intraparietal sulcus, and right premotor cortex. These results suggest that perceiving social interactions automatically involves mentalizing, and ToM additionally engages brain regions for action understanding and executive functions.

neuroscience↗

From Maps to Models: A Survey on the Reliability of Small Studies of Task-Based fMRI

Task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a powerful tool for studying brain function. However, the reliability and viability of small-sample studies remain a concern. While it is well understood that larger samples are preferable, researchers often need to interpret findings from small studies (e.g., when reviewing the literature, analyzing pilot data, or assessing subsamples). However, quantitative guidance for making these judgments remains scarce. To address this gap, we leverage the Human Connectome Projects Young Adult and UK Biobank datasets to survey a range of standard task-based fMRI analyses, from obtaining regional activation maps to performing predictive modeling. These analyses are repeated using volumetric and two types of cortical surface data. For classic mass-univariate analyses (e.g., regional activation detection or cluster peak localization), studies with as few as 40 participants can be adequate depending on the effect size. For predictive modeling, similar sample sizes can be used to detect whether a feature is predictable, but developing stable, generalizable models typically requires cohorts at least an order of magnitude larger, and possibly two (hundreds or thousands). Together, these results clarify how reliability depends on the interplay of effect size, sample size, and analysis type, offering practical guidance for designing and interpreting small-scale task-fMRI studies.

neuroscience↗

A multimodal fMRI dataset unifying naturalistic processes with a rich array of experimental tasks

Cognitive neuroscience has advanced significantly due to the availability of openly shared datasets. Large sample sizes, large amounts of data per person, and diversity in tasks and data types are all desirable, but are difficult to achieve in a single dataset. Here, we present an open dataset with N = 101 participants and 6 hours of scanning per participant, with 6 multifaceted cognitive tasks including 2 hours of naturalistic movie viewing. This datasets combination of ample sample size, extensive data per participant, more than 600 iso hours worth of data, and a wide range of experimental conditions -- including cognitive, affective, social, and somatic/interoceptive tasks -- positions it uniquely for probing important questions in cognitive neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

Comparing Automated Subcortical Volume Estimation Methods; Amygdala Volumes Estimated by FSL and FreeSurfer Have Poor Consistency

Subcortical volumes are a promising source of biomarkers and features in biosignatures, and automated methods facilitate extracting them in large, phenotypically rich datasets. However, while extensive research has verified that the automated methods produce volumes that are similar to those generated by expert annotation, the consistency of methods with each other is understudied. Using data from the UK Biobank, we compare the estimates of subcortical volumes produced by two popular software suites: FSL and FreeSurfer. Although most subcortical volumes exhibit good to excellent consistency across the methods, the tools produce diverging estimates of amygdalar volume. Through simulation, we show that this poor consistency can lead to conflicting results, where one but not the other tool suggests statistical significance, or where both tools suggest a significant relationship but in opposite directions. Considering these issues, we discuss several ways in which care should be taken when reporting on relationships involving amygdalar volume.

neuroscience↗

NeuroModulation Modeling (NMM): Inferring the form of neuromodulation from fMRI tuning functions

Many neuroscience theories assume that tuning modulation of individual neurons underlies changes in human cognition. However, non-invasive fMRI lacks sufficient resolution to visualize this modulation. To address this limitation, we developed an analysis framework called Inferring Neural Tuning Modulation (INTM) for "peering inside" voxels. Precise specification of neural tuning from the BOLD signal is not possible. Instead, INTM compares theoretical alternatives for the form of neural tuning modulation that might underlie changes in BOLD across experimental conditions. The most likely form is identified via formal model comparison, with assumed parametric Normal tuning functions, followed by a non-parametric check of conclusions. We validated the framework by successfully identifying a well-established form of modulation: visual contrast-induced multiplicative gain for orientation tuned neurons. INTM can be applied to any experimental paradigm testing several points along a continuous feature dimension (e.g., direction of motion, isoluminant hue) across two conditions (e.g., with/without attention, before/after learning).

neuroscience↗

A Computational Model of Perceptual and Mnemonic Deficits in Medial Temporal Lobe Amnesia

Damage to the Medial Temporal Lobe (MTL) has long been known to impair declarative memory and recent evidence suggests that it also impairs visual perception. A theory termed the representational-hierarchical account explains such impairments by assuming that MTL stores conjunctive representations of items and events, and that individuals with MTL damage must rely upon representations of simple visual features in posterior visual cortex, which are inadequate to support memory and perception under certain circumstances. One recent study of visual discrimination behavior revealed a surprising anti-perceptual learning effect in MTL-damaged individuals: with exposure to a set of visual stimuli, discrimination performance worsened rather than improved (Barense et al., 2012). We extend the representational-hierarchical account to explain this paradox by assuming that difficult visual discriminations are performed by comparing the relative representational tunedness - or familiarity - of the to-be-discriminated items. Exposure to a set of highly similar stimuli entails repeated presentation of simple visual features, eventually rendering all feature representations maximally, and thus equally, familiar [-] hence, they are inutile for solving the task. Discrimination performance in patients with MTL lesions is therefore impaired by stimulus exposure. Because the unique conjunctions represented in MTL do not occur repeatedly, healthy individuals are shielded from this perceptual interference. We simulate this mechanism with a neural network previously used to explain recognition memory, thereby providing a model that accounts for both mnemonic and perceptual deficits caused by MTL damage with a unified architecture and mechanism.

neuroscience↗