Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Ryden, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Ryden, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Enhancing the biological relevance of Gene Co-expression Networks: A plant mitochondrial case study

Gene Co-expression Networks (GCNs) are obtained by a variety of mathematical of models commonly derived on data sampled from diverse developmental processes, tissue types, pathologies, mutant backgrounds, and stress conditions. These networks aim to identify genes with similar expression dynamics, but are prone to introduce false-positive and -negative relations, especially in the instance of large and highly complex datasets. With the aim of optimizing the relevance of edges in GCNs and enhancing global biological insight, we propose a novel approach that involves a data-centering step performed simultaneously per gene and per sub-experiment, called centralisation within sub-experiments (CSE).\n\nUsing a gene set encoding for the plant mitochondrial proteome as a case study, our results show that CSE-based GCNs had significantly more edges within the majority of the considered functional sub-networks, such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain and its sub-complexes, than GCNs not using CSE; thus demonstrating that the CSE-based GCNs are efficient at predicting those canonical functions and associated pathways, also referred to as the \"core network\". Furthermore, we show that CSE, in conjunction with conventional correlation analyses can be used to fine-tune the prediction of the function for uncharacterised genes; while in combination with analyses based on non-centralised data can augment those conventional stress analyses with the innate connections underpinning the dynamic system examined.\n\nTherefore, CSE appears as an alternative method to conventional batch correction approaches. The method is easy to implement into a pre-existing GCN analysis pipeline and can provide accentuated biological relevance to conventional GCNs by allowing users to delineate a \"core\" gene network.\n\nAuthor SummaryGene Co-expression networks (GCNs) are the product of a variety of mathematical models that identify causal relationships in gene expression dynamics, but are prone to the misdiagnoses of false-positives and -negatives, especially in the instance of large and highly complex datasets. In light of the burgeoning output of next generation sequencing projects performed on any species, under different developmental or clinical conditions, the statistical power and complexity of these networks will undoubtedly increase, while their biological relevance will be fiercely challenged. Here, we propose a novel approach to primarily generate a \"core\" GCN with augmented biological relevance. Our method, which involves data-centering steps and thus effectively removes all primary treatment / tissue /patient effects, is simple to employ and can be easily implemented into pre-existing GCN analysis pipelines. The gained biological relevance of such an approach was validated using a subcellular gene set encoding for the plant mitochondrial proteome, and by applying numerous steps to challenge its application.

bioinformatics

Cluster analysis on high dimensional RNA-seq data with applications to cancer research- An evaluation study

Clustering of gene expression data is widely used to identify novel subtypes of cancer. Plenty of clustering approaches have been proposed, but there is a lack of knowledge regarding their relative merits and how data characteristics influence the performance. We evaluate how cluster analysis choices affect the performance by studying four publicly available human cancer data sets: breast, brain, kidney and stomach cancer. In particular, we focus on how the sample size, distribution of subtypes and sample heterogeneity affect the performance.\n\nIn general, increasing the sample size had limited effect on the clustering performance, e.g. for the breast cancer data similar performance was obtained for n = 40 as for n = 330. The relative distribution of the subtypes had a noticeable effect on the ability of identifying the disease subtypes and data with heavily skewed distributions turned out to be difficult to cluster. Both the choice of clustering method and selection method affected the ability to identify the subtypes, but the relative performance varied between data sets, making it difficult to rank the approaches. For some data sets, the performance was substantially higher when the clustering was based on data from only one sex compared to data from a mixed population. This suggests that homogeneous data are easier to cluster than heterogeneous data and that clustering males and females individually may be beneficial and increase the chance to detect novel subtypes. It was also observed that the performance often differed substantially between females and males.\n\nThe number of samples seems to have a limited effect on the performance while the heterogeneity, at least with respect to sex, is important for the performance. Hence, by analyzing the genders separately, the possible loss caused by having fewer samples could be outweighed by the benefit of a more homogeneous data.

bioinformatics