Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ruxton, G. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruxton, G. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The price of defence: toxins, visual signals and oxidative state in an aposematic butterfly

In a variety of aposematic species, the conspicuousness of an individuals warning signal and the quantity of its chemical defence are positively correlated. This apparent honest signalling is predicted by resource competition models which assume that the production and maintenance of aposematic defences compete for access to antioxidant molecules that have dual functions as pigments and in protecting against oxidative damage. We raised monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) on their milkweed host-plants (Apocynaceae) with increasing quantities of cardenolides to test whether (1) the sequestration of secondary defences is associated with costs in the form of oxidative lipid damage and reduced antioxidant defences; and (2) that reduced oxidative state can decrease the capacity of individuals to produce aposematic displays. In male monarchs conspicuousness was explained by an interaction between oxidative damage and sequestration: males with high levels of oxidative damage become less conspicuous with increased sequestration of cardenolides, whereas those with low oxidative damage become more conspicuous with increased levels of cardenolides. There was no significant effect of oxidative damage or concentration of sequestered cardenolides on female conspicuousness. Our results demonstrate a physiological linkage between the production of coloration and protection from autotoxicity, and differential costs of signalling in monarch butterflies.

evolutionary biology↗

Comparing two circular distributions: advice for effective implementation of statistical procedures in biology

Many biological variables, often involving timings of events or directions, are recorded on a circular rather than linear scale, and need different statistical treatment for that reason. A common question that is asked of such circular data involves comparison between two groups or treatments: Are the populations from which the two samples drawn differently distributed around the circle? For example, we might ask whether the distribution of directions from which a stalking predator approaches its prey differs between sunny and cloudy conditions; or whether the time of day of mating attempts differs between lab mice subject to one of two hormone treatments. An array of statistical approaches to these questions have been developed. We compared 18 of these (by simulation) in terms of both abilities to control type I error rate near the nominal value, and statistical power. We found that only eight tests offered good control of type I error in all our test situations. Of these eight, we are able to identify Watsons U2 test and MANOVA based on trigonometric functions of the data as offering the best power in the overwhelming majority of our test circumstances. There was often little to choose between these tests in terms of power, and no situation where either of the remaining six tests offered substantially better power than either of these. Hence, we recommend the routine use of either Watsons U2 test or MANOVA when comparing two samples of circular data.

animal behavior and cognition↗