Biology subjects

Ruttenberg, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruttenberg, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Leveraging Human Pangenome for Improved Somatic Variant Detection

Somatic variant detection is technically challenging due to low variant allele fractions, the confounding presence of germline variation, and reference bias. Linear references such as GRCh38 miss sample-specific variation, causing misalignments and incorrect variant calls. Although telomere-to-telomere donor-specific assemblies (DSAs) accurately represent individual genomes, their application is limited by cost and technical barriers. Alternatively, the graph-based human pangenome provides a scalable framework to improve read alignment and perform genome inference. Here, we benchmarked somatic variant detection using GRCh38, graph-based pangenomes, and pangenome-inferred DSAs with a HapMap mixture dataset and the COLO829 melanoma cell line. Pangenome-guided alignment improves read mapping and somatic variant calling accuracy. Furthermore, personalized pangenomes partially reconstruct donor-specific genomic content, improving accuracy, reducing germline contamination, and enabling detection of events in loci absent or poorly represented in GRCh38. These findings demonstrate that graph-based and personalized pangenomes are effective strategies for enhancing somatic variant detection compared with GRCh38.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2025

A Pangenomic Method for Establishing a Somatic Variant Detection Resource in HapMap Mixtures

Somatic mosaicism is essential in human biology and disease, yet robust benchmarks are scarce. The SMaHT Consortium mixed six HapMap cell lines to create artificial somatic variants spanning 0.25% to 16.5% variant allele fractions. We developed a technology-agnostic method that builds pangenome graphs from individual assemblies to create unified benchmarking sets: > 6M single-nucleotide variants, 1.8M small insertions/deletions, 49K structural variations, and 10K mobile element insertions across autosomes, X, and mitochondrial chromosomes. We validated the variants using ultra-deep simulated reads and developed a binomial-based model to estimate coverage requirements for variant detection. Evaluating multiple callers showed CHM13 alignment improves structural variant detection and offers advantages in difficult-to-map regions compared to GRCh38. Systematic characterization showed regions with low detection rate are enriched in centromeres, satellite sequences, tandem repeats, and falsely duplicated genes. This accurate, versatile resource enables systematic evaluation of somatic variant detection technologies.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2025

VO: The Vaccine Ontology

With the widespread use of vaccines in research and clinical settings, there is an urgent need to standardize vaccine representation, integrate information across diverse vaccine types, and support computer-assisted reasoning. Accordingly, we have since 2007 developed the community-based Vaccine Ontology (VO), which aligns with the Basic Formal Ontology and adheres to OBO Foundry principles. VO models ontologically vaccines, vaccine components, vaccine immune responses, vaccine investigation studies and other vaccine-related topics. VO represents more than 10,000 vaccines targeting 289 infectious pathogens and cancers in humans and over 30 nonhuman animal species. VO provides mappings to external resources such as RxNorm, CVX, FDA, and USDA. Various VO use cases exist. VO facilitates vaccine standardization in resources such as the VIOLIN vaccine database, ImmPort, and the Vaccine Adjuvant Compendium (VAC). Semantic queries can be made to query VO. VO has been shown to enhance experimental and clinical vaccine data analysis and vaccine literature mining. Overall, VO standardizes vaccine modeling and representation and greatly supports vaccine AI research in the Semantic Web era.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

OBO Foundry in 2021: Operationalizing Open Data Principles to Evaluate Ontologies

Biological ontologies are used to organize, curate, and interpret the vast quantities of data arising from biological experiments. While this works well when using a single ontology, integrating multiple ontologies can be problematic, as they are developed independently, which can lead to incompatibilities. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry was created to address this by facilitating the development, harmonization, application, and sharing of ontologies, guided by a set of overarching principles. One challenge in reaching these goals was that the OBO principles were not originally encoded in a precise fashion, and interpretation was subjective. Here we show how we have addressed this by formally encoding the OBO principles as operational rules and implementing a suite of automated validation checks and a dashboard for objectively evaluating each ontologys compliance with each principle. This entailed a substantial effort to curate metadata across all ontologies and to coordinate with individual stakeholders. We have applied these checks across the full OBO suite of ontologies, revealing areas where individual ontologies require changes to conform to our principles. Our work demonstrates how a sizable federated community can be organized and evaluated on objective criteria that help improve overall quality and interoperability, which is vital for the sustenance of the OBO project and towards the overall goals of making data FAIR.

bioinformatics↗