Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ruiz-Lambides, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruiz-Lambides, A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Taking identity-by-descent analysis into the wild: Estimating realized relatedness in free-ranging macaques

Biological relatedness is a key consideration in studies of behavior, population structure, and trait evolution. Except for parent-offspring dyads, pedigrees capture relatedness imperfectly. The number and length of DNA segments that are identical-by-descent (IBD) yield the most precise estimates of relatedness. Here, we leverage novel methods for estimating locus-specific IBD from low coverage whole genome resequencing data to demonstrate the feasibility and value of resolving fine-scaled gradients of relatedness in free-living animals. Using primarily 4-6x coverage data from a rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) population with available long-term pedigree data, we show that we can call the number and length of IBD segments across the genome with high accuracy even at 0.5x coverage. The resulting estimates demonstrate substantial variation in genetic relatedness within kin classes, leading to overlapping distributions between kin classes. They identify cryptic genetic relatives that are not represented in the pedigree and reveal elevated recombination rates in females relative to males, which allows us to discriminate maternal and paternal kin using genotype data alone. Our findings represent a breakthrough in the ability to understand the predictors and consequences of genetic relatedness in natural populations, contributing to our understanding of a fundamental component of population structure in the wild.

ecology↗

Socioecological drivers of injuries in female and male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Competition over access to resources, such as food and mates, is believed to be one of the major costs associated with group living. Two socioecological factors suggested to predict the intensity of competition are group size and the relative abundance of sexually active individuals. However, empirical evidence linking these factors to injuries and survival costs is scarce. Here, we leveraged 10 years of data from free-ranging rhesus macaques where injuries inflicted by conspecifics are associated with a high mortality risk. We tested if group size and adult sex ratio predicted the occurrence of injuries and used data on physical aggression to contextualise these results. We found that males were less likely to be injured when living in larger groups, potentially due to advantages in intergroup encounters. Females, instead, had higher injury risk when living in larger groups but this was not explained by within-group aggression among females. Further, male-biased sex ratios predicted a weak increase in injury risk in females and were positively related to male-female aggression, indicating that male coercion during mating competition may be a cause of injuries in females. Overall, our results provide insights into sex differences in the fitness-related costs of competition and empirical evidence for long-standing predictions on the evolution of group living.

evolutionary biology↗

Early life adversity has sex-dependent effects on survival across the lifespan in rhesus macaques

Exposure to adversity during early life is linked to lasting detrimental effects on evolutionary fitness across many taxa. However, due to the challenges of collecting longitudinal data, especially in species where one sex disperses, direct evidence from long-lived species remains relatively scarce. Here we test the effects of early life adversity on male and female longevity in a free-ranging population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) at Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico. We leveraged six decades of data to quantify the relative importance of ten forms of early life adversity for 6,599 macaques (3,230 male, 3,369 female), with a smaller sample size (N=299) for one form of adversity (maternal social isolation) which required high-resolution behavioral data. We found that individuals who experienced more early life adversity died earlier than those who experienced less adversity. Mortality risk was highest during early life, defined as birth to four years old, suggesting acute survival effects of adversity, but heightened mortality risk was also present in macaques who survived to adulthood. Females and males were affected differently by some forms of adversity, and these differences might be driven by varying energetic demands, female philopatry, and male dispersal. By leveraging data on thousands of macaques collected over decades, our results show that the fitness consequences of early life adversity are not uniform across individuals but vary as a function of the type of adversity, timing, and social context, and thus contribute to our limited but growing understanding of the evolution of early life sensitivities in long-lived species. Significance Statement Exposure to early life adversity, even when conditions subsequently improve, can have profound and persistent consequences for human health. Negative effects of early life adversity appear widespread across the animal kingdom. To date, however, direct evidence from long-lived species is relatively scarce due to the difficulties of collecting data from early life till death. We leverage six decades of observations on thousands of free-ranging male and female rhesus macaques to examine the complex ways early life adversity impacts survival. Our results suggest that the type of adversity and life history factors intersect to impact immediate and downstream survival. By studying early life adversity across environments, cultures, contexts, and species, we can better understand the evolutionary underpinnings of early life sensitivities.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Cost and benefits of being social: examining the influence of sociality on faecal parasites in free-ranging rhesus macaques

Parasites and infectious diseases constitute an important challenge to the health of group-living animals. Social contact and shared space can both increase disease transmission risk, while individual differences in social resources can help prevent infections. For example, high social status individuals and those with more or stronger social relationships may have better immunity and, thus, lower parasitic burden. To test for health trade-offs in the costs and benefits of sociality, we quantified how parasitic load varied with an individuals social status, as well as with their weak and strong affiliative relationships in a free-ranging population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Social resources may also protect against infection under environmentally challenging situations, such as natural disasters. We additionally examined the impact of a major hurricane on the sociality-parasite relationship in this system. We found that both weak and strong proximity partners, but not grooming partners, were associated with lower protozoa infection risk. Social status was not linked to infection risk, even after the hurricane. Overall, our study highlights the buffering against infection that affiliative partners may provide, suggesting individuals can compensate for the health costs of sociality by having partners who tolerate their presence.

ecology↗

Reduced injury risk links sociality to survival in a group-living primate

Affiliative social relationships and high social status predict longer lifespans in many mammal species, including humans. Yet, the mechanisms by which these components of sociality influence survival are still largely unknown. Using 10 years of data and over 1000 recorded injuries from a free-ranging population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), we investigated two possible mechanisms that could underpin the relationship between sociality and survival: sociality (1) reduces injury risk; and/or (2) increases the probability of survival after an injury. We found that sociality can affect an individuals survival by influencing their risk of injury, but had no effect on the probability of injured individuals dying. Individuals with more affiliative partners experienced fewer injuries compared to less socially integrated. Social status was also associated with lower risk of injury, particularly for older high-ranking individuals. These results represent the first demonstration of a link between social integration and fatal injury risk in a group-living species, and are the first to link social status, injury risk and survival outside of humans. Collectively, our results offer insights into a mechanism that can mediate the well-known benefits of sociality on an individuals fitness.

evolutionary biology↗

Sociodemographic effects on immune cell composition in a free-ranging non-human primate.

Increasing age is associated with dysregulated immune function and increased inflammation- patterns that are also observed in individuals exposed to chronic social adversity. Yet we still know little about how social adversity impacts the immune system and how it might promote age-related diseases. Here, we investigated how immune cell diversity varied with age, sex and social adversity (operationalized as low social status) in free-ranging rhesus macaques. We found age-related signatures of immunosenescence, including lower proportions of CD20+ B cells, CD20+/CD3+ ratio, and CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratio - all signs of diminished antibody production. Age was associated with higher proportions of CD3+/CD8+ Cytotoxic T cells, CD16+/CD3-Natural Killer cells, CD3+/CD4+/CD25+ and CD3+/CD8+/CD25+ T regulatory cells, and CD14+/CD16+/HLA-DR+ intermediate monocytes, and lower levels of CD14+/CD16-/HLA-DR+ classical monocytes, indicating greater amounts of inflammation and immune dysregulation. We also found an effect of exposure to social adversity (i.e., low social status) that was sex-dependent. High-status males, relative to females, had higher CD20+/CD3+ ratios and CD16+/CD3 Natural Killer cell proportions, and lower proportions of CD8+ Cytotoxic T cells. Further, low status females had higher proportions of cytotoxic T cells than high status females, while the opposite was observed in males. High status males had higher CD20+/CD3+ ratios than low status males. Together, our study identifies immune cell types that differ by age in a human-relevant primate model animal, and demonstrates a novel link between sex-dependent immunity and social adversity.

immunology↗