Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ruby, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruby, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Auditory selective attention during a working memory task with melodies: a MEG study

Working memory and attention are jointly needed in most everyday life tasks and activities. They have however mostly been studied separately. Here we investigate how auditory working memory and selective attention interact using a recently introduced paradigm (MEMAT) that combines a classic working memory paradigm, the delayed-matching-to-sample task, and selective attention, with distractors presented during the encoding phase. All stimuli are four-tone melodies. Twenty-two participants performed the MEMAT task during MEG recordings. We manipulate the difficulty of the memory task and of attentional filtering. When memory task difficulty increases, the amplitude of the CNV in anticipation of the melody to encode increases and the decrease in alpha power during encoding and maintenance in a left fronto-temporal network is reduced. When attentional filtering difficulty increases, the amplitude of the sustained evoked response during encoding increases, whereas the differential processing of relevant and irrelevant sounds in auditory areas is less pronounced, and frontal theta power during encoding and maintenance is higher. In the left auditory cortex, we could directly observe the result of the interaction between auditory memory and attention: the facilitation of relevant sound processing in the easy filtering condition was reduced when the memory task difficulty increased. This pattern mirrors the observed behavioral effects. Overall brain dynamics highlight reciprocal influences of working memory and selective attention processes, in keeping with shared cognitive resources between them.

neuroscience↗

Increase of both bottom-up and top-down attentional processes in high dream recallers

Event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with the involuntary orientation of (bottom-up) attention towards an unexpected sound are of larger amplitude in high dream recallers (HR) than in low dream recallers (LR) during passive listening, suggesting different attentional functioning. We measured bottom-up and top-down attentional performance and their cerebral correlates in 18 HR (11 women, age = 22.7 {+/-} 4.1 years, dream recall frequency = 5.3 {+/-} 1.3 days with a dream recall per week) and 19 LR (10 women, age = 22.3, DRF = 0.2 {+/-}0.2) using EEG and the Competitive Attention Task. Between-group differences were found in ERPs but not in behavior. The results confirm that HR present larger ERPs to distracting sounds than LR during active listening, suggesting enhanced bottom-up processing of irrelevant sounds. HR also presented a larger contingent negative variation during target expectancy and a larger P3b response to target sounds than LR, speaking for an enhanced recruitment of top-down attention. Enhancement of both top-down and bottom-up processes in HR leads to an apparently preserved attentional balance since similar performance were observed in the two groups. Therefore, different neurophysiological profiles can result in similar cognitive performance, with some profiles possibly costlier in term of resource/energy consumption.

neuroscience↗