Biology subjects

Rubis, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Rubis, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Transcriptomic FOLFIRINOX sensitivity signatures stratify overall survival and reveal directional reclassification after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background: Transcriptomic FOLFIRINOX-component sensitivity signatures have been clinically evaluated in resected and advanced PDAC, but their relevance and longitudinal stability in the neoadjuvant BR/LA setting are unknown. Patients and methods: We retrospectively studied 77 patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by resection. Pretreatment sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan was determined using previously developed locked transcriptomic classifiers and integrated into a regimen-level FOLFIRINOX classification. The primary molecular cohort comprised 53 patients whose pretreatment biopsies had [≥]10% tumour cellularity. Cox models assessed associations with survival. Longitudinal changes were assessed in 35 paired tumours. Results: Thirty-one pretreatment tumours were classified as FOLFIRINOX-sensitive (FFX-Sens), and 22 were not classified as FOLFIRINOX-sensitive (FFX-Res). FFX-Sens status was associated with longer overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.93; p=0.029). In the complete-case model adjusted for baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and tumour size (n=50), the association with OS persisted (adjusted HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96; p=0.037), whereas the adjusted association with disease-free survival was not statistically significant (adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.10; p=0.090). Among paired tumours, 15 changed from FFX-Sens to FFX-Res and four in the opposite direction (exact McNemar p=0.019). The OS association also persisted after adjustment for postoperative pathological factors (adjusted HR 0.40; p=0.015). Conclusions: Pretreatment FOLFIRINOX sensitivity was associated with OS under neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, while matched pretreatment and residual-tumour analyses revealed significant directional reclassification after treatment. These findings extend the clinical evaluation of validated drug-specific FOLFIRINOX sensitivity classifiers to the neoadjuvant setting and provide a longitudinal assessment of their stability during treatment. They support prospective evaluation of both pretreatment stratification and molecular reassessment of residual disease.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2020

NUPR1 protects liver from lipotoxic injury by improving the endoplasmic reticulum stress response

Background and AimsNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease and related hepatic syndromes affect up to one third of the adult population. The molecular mechanisms underlying NAFL etiology remain elusive. Nuclear Protein 1 (NUPR1) expression increases upon cell injury in all organs and recently we report its active participation in the activation of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR typically maintains protein homeostasis, but downstream mediators of the pathway regulate metabolic functions, including lipid metabolism. NUPR1 and UPR increase have been reported in obesity and liver pathologies and the goal of this study was to investigate the roles of NUPR1 in this context. MethodsWe used patient-derived liver biopsies and in vitro and in vivo NUPR1 loss of functions models. First, we analysed NUPR1 expression in a cohort of morbidly obese patients (MOPs), with either simple fatty liver (NAFL) or more severe steatohepatitis (NASH). Next, we explored the metabolic roles of NUPR1 in wild type (Nupr1+/+) or Nupr1 knockout mice (Nupr1-/-) fed ad libitum with a high fat diet (HFD) for up to 15 weeks. ResultsNUPR1 expression is inversely correlated to hepatic steatosis progression. We found that NUPR1 participates in the activation of PPAR- signalling via UPR. PPAR- signalling, is involved in the maintenance of fat metabolism and proper lipid homeostasis and energy balance. As PPAR- signalling is controlled by UPR, collectively, these findings suggest a novel function for NUPR1 in protecting liver from metabolic distress by controlling lipid homeostasis, possibly through the UPR. ObjectiveNon-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) disease and related hepatic syndromes affect up to one third of the adult population in industrialised and developing countries. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying NAFL etiology remain elusive. Nuclear Protein 1 (NUPR1) expression increases upon cell injury in all organs including the liver. Recently, we report NUPR1 actively participates in activation of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). The UPR typically maintains protein homeostasis, but downstream mediators of the pathway regulate metabolic functions, including lipid metabolism. NUPR1 and UPR increase have been reported in obesity and liver pathologies and the goal of this study was to investigate the roles of NUPR1 in this context. DesignWe used patient-derived liver biopsies and in vitro and in vivo NUPR1 loss of functions models. First, we analysed NUPR1 expression in a cohort of morbidly obese patients (MOPs), with either simple fatty liver (NAFL) or more severe steatohepatitis (NASH). Next, we explored the metabolic roles of NUPR1 in wild type (Nupr1+/+) or Nupr1 knockout mice (Nupr1-/-) fed ad libitum with a high fat diet (HFD) for up to 15 weeks. ResultsNUPR1 expression is inversely correlated to hepatic steatosis progression. Mechanistically, we found NUPR1 participates in the activation of PPAR- signalling via UPR. PPAR- signalling, is involved in the maintenance of fat metabolism and proper lipid homeostasis and energy balance. As PPAR- signalling is controlled by UPR, collectively, these findings suggest a novel function for NUPR1 in protecting liver from metabolic distress by controlling lipid homeostasis, possibly through the UPR. ConclusionsAs PPAR- signalling is controlled by UPR, collectively, these findings suggest a novel function for NUPR1 in protecting liver from metabolic distress by controlling lipid homeostasis, possibly through the UPR. Lay summaryNUPR1 is activated during high caloric intake in both mice and patients. Decrease in expression or inhibition of NUPR1 worsens lipid deposition and hepatic damage. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=192 SRC="FIGDIR/small/350652v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d370c0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8f8dc9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a5aa49org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4eb585_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LINUPR1 protects liver from high caloric intake hepatic damage C_LIO_LIThe function of NUPR1 in this context is to control the lipid homeostasis through the UPR and more specifically through PPAR- signalling. C_LIO_LINUPR1 could be used as a predictive marker for the gravity of NAFL progression. Moreover, as clinical interest is being raised around NUPR1 inhibitors to treat liver and pancreatic cancer, care should be taken in monitoring lipotoxic parameters. C_LI

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Establishment of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma molecular gradient (PAMG) that predicts the clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUNDA significant gap in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients care is the lack of molecular parameters characterizing tumors and allowing a personalized treatment. The goal of this study was to examine whole PDAC transcriptomic profiles to define a signature that would predict aggressiveness and treatment responsiveness better than done until now. METHODS AND PATIENTSTumors were obtained from 76 consecutive resectable (n=40) or unresectable (n=36) tumors. PDAC were transplanted in mice to produce patient-drived xenografts (PDX). PDX were classified according to their histology into five groups, from highly undifferentiated to well differentiated. This classification resulted strongly associated with tumors aggressiveness. A PDAC molecular gradient (PAMG) was constructed from PDX transcriptomes recapitulating the five histological groups along a continuous gradient. The prognostic and predictive value for PMAG was evaluated in: i/ two independent series (n=598) of resected tumors; ii/ 60 advanced tumors obtained by diagnostic EUS-guided biopsy needle flushing and iii/ on 28 biopsies from mFOLFIRINOX treated metastatic tumors. RESULTSA unique transcriptomic signature (PAGM) was generated with significant and independent prognostic value. PAMG significantly improves the characterization of PDAC heterogeneity compared to non-overlapping classifications as validated in 4 independent series of tumors (e.g. 308 consecutive resected PDAC, HR=0.321 95% CI [0.207;0.5] and 60 locally-advanced or metastatic PDAC, HR=0.308 95% CI [0.113;0.836]). The PAMG signature is also associated with progression under mFOLFIRINOX treatment (Pearson correlation to tumor response: -0.67, p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONWe identified a transcriptomic signature (PAMG) that, unlike all other stratification schemas already proposed, classifies PDAC along a continuous gradient. It can be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples and EUS-guided biopsies showing a strong prognostic value and predicting mFOLFIRINOX responsiveness. We think that PAMG could unify all PDAC preexisting classifications inducing a shift in the actual paradigm of binary classifications towards a better characterization in a gradient. Trial RegistrationThe PaCaOmics study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT01692873. The validation BACAP study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02818829.

cancer biology↗