The motivational control of instrumental performance by nutrient-specific appetites depends on incentive learning
Considerable evidence suggests that the motivational control of instrumental action depends on incentive learning; i.e., on the opportunity to learn how the value of the consequences or outcome of an action, (e.g., a specific food) varies under different motivational conditions (e.g., under different degrees of hunger). The current study investigated whether learning the values of high-protein and high-carbohydrate rewards under different degrees of protein and carbohydrate appetite is also necessary for these nutrient-specific appetites to exert control over instrumental performance. Experiment 1 gave differing consummatory experience to whey protein and polycose carbohydrate outcomes under protein and carbohydrate appetite and found that, without the opportunity for incentive learning, the performance of actions earning these outcomes was insensitive to a shift in appetite. However, once the opportunity for incentive learning was provided, the rats increased their instrumental performance on a lever that earned the whey outcome relative to the polycose lever when protein hungry and on the polycose lever relative to the whey lever when carbohydrate hungry. Experiment 2 assessed how these nutrient-specific states exerted this control; whether, once learned, nutrient values were immediately controlled by nutrient appetite or whether this was based on conditional control acquired during experience with the outcomes under different nutrient appetites. We found that exposure to an outcome under a single nutrient-specific state was not sufficient to establish state-specific control. Instead, establishing the conditional control of outcome value required exposure to both the whey and polycose outcomes under both protein and carbohydrate appetites.