Rosendahl, W. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Evolutionary history and genomic vulnerability of the extinct giant deer Megaloceros giganteus

The extinct giant deer (Megaloceros giganteus) was one of the most striking megafaunal species of the Late Quaternary, distinguished by its enormous palmated antlers reaching up to 3.5 m across, the largest known among both living and extinct cervids. Despite its iconic status, little is known about its genomic history prior to extinction [~]8 thousand years ago (kya). We generated the first nuclear palaeogenomes for Megaloceros, represented by nine individuals from Germany ([~]40 kya) and Ireland ([~]11 kya), mapped to a new chromosome-level reference genome of the fallow deer (Dama dama). Phylogenomic analyses placed Megaloceros as sister to Dama (divergence [~]3.5 Ma) and revealed evidence of gene flow with ancestral Cervus lineages. Population analyses identified clear differentiation between German and Irish lineages, with higher genetic diversity in the German individuals. Two genes under strong positive selection, BNIPL and SLC10A7, are associated with apoptosis regulation and skeletal development/bone mineralisation, respectively, and may relate to the species large body and antler size. Demographic reconstructions indicate a long-term decline in effective population size, extremely low heterozygosity, little evidence of extensive runs of homozygosity, and an elevated burden of predicted deleterious alleles. Together, these results suggest that Megaloceros entered the terminal Pleistocene in a genomically fragile state, offering new insight into the biology and evolutionary legacy of one of the largest and most distinctive cervids that ever lived.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct Eurasian populations

BackgroundResolving the historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) is a complex issue, because patterns inferred from fossils and from molecular data lack congruence. Fossil evidence supports an African origin, and suggests that leopards were already present in Eurasia during the Early Pleistocene. Analysis of DNA sequences however, suggests a more recent, Middle Pleistocene shared ancestry of Asian and African leopards. These contrasting patterns led researchers to propose a two-stage hypothesis of leopard dispersal out of Africa: an initial Early Pleistocene colonisation of Asia and a subsequent replacement by a second colonisation wave during the Middle Pleistocene. The status of Late Pleistocene European leopards within this scenario is unclear: were these populations remnants of the first dispersal, or do the last surviving European leopards share more recent ancestry with their African counterparts?\n\nResultsIn this study, we generate and analyse mitogenome sequences from historical samples that span the entire modern leopard distribution, as well as from Late Pleistocene remains. We find a deep bifurcation between African and Eurasian mitochondrial lineages ([~]710 Ka), with the European ancient samples as sister to all Asian lineages ([~]483 Ka). The modern and historical mainland Asian lineages share a relatively recent common ancestor ([~]122 Ka), and we find one Javan sample nested within these.\n\nConclusionsThe phylogenetic placement of the ancient European leopard as sister group to Asian leopards suggests that these populations originate from the same out-of-Africa dispersal which founded the Asian lineages. The coalescence time found for the mitochondrial lineages aligns well with the earliest undisputed fossils in Eurasia, and thus encourages a re-evaluation of the identification of the much older putative leopard fossils from the region. The relatively recent ancestry of all mainland Asian leopard lineages suggests that these populations underwent a severe population bottleneck during the Pleistocene. Finally, although only based on a single sample, the unexpected phylogenetic placement of the Javan leopard could be interpreted as evidence for exchange of mitochondrial lineages between Java and mainland Asia, calling for further investigation into the evolutionary history of this subspecies.

evolutionary biology↗