Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rose, A. A. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Rose, A. A. N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

eIF4A inhibition disrupts resistance-associated translational and metabolic programs in BRAF-mutant melanoma

Acquired resistance to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors remains a major barrier to durable control of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Although resistance mechanisms are heterogeneous, they converge on adaptive programs that support survival, phenotypic plasticity, and metabolic fitness. We asked whether eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A (eIF4A)-dependent mRNA translation represents a shared vulnerability of kinase inhibitor-resistant melanoma. Using matched BRAFV600E A375 and BRAF inhibitor-resistant A375R cells together with additional melanoma models, we integrated pharmacological and functional assays with polysome-associated RNA sequencing, quantitative proteomics, bioenergetic profiling, metabolomics, [U-13C5]glutamine tracing, and xenograft studies. Melanoma cells remained sensitive to multiple eIF4A inhibitors regardless of their responsiveness to BRAF inhibition. The eIF4A inhibitor CR-1-31-B rapidly reduced nascent protein synthesis when used alone in A375 cells and when added to the BRAF inhibitor PLX4032 in A375R cells; it also reduced BCL-2, CDK4, and cyclin D3 abundance, suppressed clonogenic growth, and induced apoptosis. Integrated analysis showed that acquired resistance involved broad RNA-abundance remodeling with superimposed changes in translational efficiency and buffering, affecting survival, extracellular-matrix and plasticity programs, and mitochondrial and metabolic functions. In resistant cells, CR-1-31-B induced early transcript-selective translational changes, accompanied at later time points by RNA-abundance and proteome remodeling. Publicly annotated 5' untranslated regions (5'UTRs) of CR-1-31-B-sensitive transcripts were enriched for purine-rich sequence architecture and local structural complexity. eIF4A inhibition preferentially attenuated the expression of proteins acquired during resistance and imposed a lower-output metabolic state in sensitive and resistant cells, reducing tricarboxylic-acid-cycle and pentose-phosphate-pathway metabolite pools and restricting intracellular glutamine-carbon transfer downstream of uptake. In A375 xenografts, CR-1-31-B delayed tumor growth, while its combination with PLX4720 produced deeper and more sustained tumor control and prolonged tumor endpoint-free survival compared with PLX4720 alone. These findings show that multiple resistance-associated programs spanning signaling, cell survival, and metabolism share a dependency on eIF4A-dependent translation and provide a preclinical rationale to test whether adding eIF4A inhibition can prolong responses to MAPK-targeted therapy in melanoma.

cancer biology↗

The clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic landscape of BRAF mutant cancers

BackgroundBRAF mutations are classified into 4 molecularly distinct groups, and Class 1 (V600) mutant tumors are treated with targeted therapies. Effective treatment has not been established for Class 2/3 or BRAF Fusions. We investigated whether BRAF mutation class differed according to clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic variables in cancer patients. MethodsUsing the AACR GENIE (v.12) cancer database, the distribution of BRAF mutation class in adult cancer patients was analyzed according to sex, age, primary race, and tumor type. Genomic alteration data and transcriptomic analysis was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas. ResultsBRAF mutations were identified in 9515 (6.2%) samples among 153,834, with melanoma (31%), CRC (20.7%), and NSCLC (13.9%) being the most frequent cancer types. Class 1 harbored co-mutations outside of the MAPK pathway (TERT, RFN43) vs Class 2/3 mutations (RAS, NF1). Across all tumour types, Class 2/3 were enriched for alterations in genes involved in UV response and WNT/{beta}-catenin. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of WNT/{beta}-catenin and Hedgehog signaling in non-V600 mutated CRC. Males had a higher proportion of Class 3 mutations vs. females (17.4% vs 12.3% q = 0.003). Non-V600 mutations were generally more common in older patients (aged 60+) vs younger (38% vs 15% p<0.0001), except in CRC (15% vs 30% q = 0.0001). Black race was associated with non-V600 BRAF alterations (OR: 1.58; p<0.0001). ConclusionsClass 2/3 BRAF are more present in Black, male patients with co-mutations outside of the MAPK pathway, likely requiring additional oncogenic input for tumorigenesis. Improving access to NGS and trial enrollment will help development of targeted therapies for non-V600 BRAF mutations. Statement of Translational RelevanceBRAF mutations are classified in 4 categories based on molecular characteristics, but only Class 1 BRAF V600 have effective targeted treatment strategies. With increasing access to next-generation sequencing, oncologists are more frequently uncovering non-V600 BRAF mutations, where there remains a scarcity of effective therapies. Responsiveness to MAPK pathway inhibitors differs according to BRAF mutation class and primary tumor type. For this reason, we sought to determine whether key demographic, genomic, and transcriptomic differences existed between classes. This cross-sectional study analyzes the largest dataset of BRAF-mutated cancers to date. Our findings propose insights to optimize clinical trial design and patient selection in the pursuit of developing effective treatment strategies for patients whose tumors harbor non-V600 BRAF mutations. This study also offers insights into the potential of targeting alternative pathways in addition to the MAPK pathway as part of combinatorial treatment strategies.

cancer biology↗