Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rohlfing, A.-K.

Publications and source records attributed to Rohlfing, A.-K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

ACKR3 agonism induces heterodimerization with chemokine receptor CXCR4 and attenuates platelet function

BackgroundPlatelet receptors ACKR3 and CXCR4 play a crucial role in a variety of cardio-vascular diseases. Like most chemokine receptors, CXCR4 is a G protein coupled receptor that induces platelet activation. In contrast, the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) lacks the ability to activate heterotrimeric G proteins and its activation leads to platelet inhibition and attenuates thrombus formation. In nucleated cells, heterodimerization of ACKR3 with CXCR4 regulates CXCL12-dependent signaling. The aim of our study was to investigate the formation of ACKR3/CXCR4 heterodimers in platelets and the subsequent consequences for platelet function. Methods and resultsUsing a microscopy proximity ligation assay (PLA, Duolink(R)) to screen for CXCR4/ACKR3 heterodimerization inducing compounds, we found that ACKR3 agonism but not conventional platelet agonists or endogen ligands lead to heterodimer formation. To further characterize the formation of ACKR3/CXCR4 heterodimers, we studied the CXCL12-dependent platelet activation via CXCR4. Both, CXCL12-dependent platelet aggregation and collagen-dependent ex vivo thrombus formation were significantly downregulated by ACKR3 agonism. Moreover, platelet intracellular calcium and Akt signaling were increased by CXCL12 and again suppressed by ACKR3-specific agonists. Previously, CXCL12 was shown to decrease platelet cAMP levels via CXCR4. Treatment with a specific ACKR3 agonist counteracted this CXCL12/CXCR4-dependent cAMP decrease. ConclusionOur results reveal that the formation of platelet ACKR3/CXCR4 heterodimers is dependent on ACKR3 rather than CXCR4. Furthermore, ACKR3 agonism induced heterodimerization is associated with mitigating CXCL12/CXCR4-dependent platelet activation possibly by modulating CXCR4-dependent G protein signaling. Our results indicate possible ACKR3 agonist functions and reinforce the potential therapeutic applications of ACKR3 agonists. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=151 SRC="FIGDIR/small/593491v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15a8b22org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1647a63org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19f36d1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c80776_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical abstract:C_FLOATNO CXCR4/ACKR3 heterodimerization in platelets. C_FIG

physiology↗

Heterocomplexes between the Atypical Chemokine MIF and the CXC-Motif Chemokine CXCL4L1 Regulate Inflammation and Thrombus Formation

To fulfil their orchestrating function in immune cell trafficking in homeostasis and disease, a network of 49 chemokines and 23 receptors capitalizes on features of specificity, redundancy, and functional selectivity such as biased agonism. The discovery of the chemokine interactome, i.e. heteromeric chemokine-chemokine interactions, even across CC- and CXC-class borders, has further expanded the complexity within the network. Moreover, some inflammatory mediators, which are not structurally linked to classical CC-, CXC-, CX3C-, or C-chemokines, can bind to chemokine receptors and behave as atypical chemokines (ACKs). We identified the cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) as an ACK that binds to the chemokine receptors CXCR2 and CXCR4 to promote atherogenic leukocyte recruitment. Here, we hypothesized that chemokine-chemokine interactions extend to ACKs and that MIF may form heterocomplexes with classical chemokines. We tested this hypothesis, applying an unbiased chemokine protein binding array. The platelet chemokine CXCL4L1, but not its variant CXCL4 or the CXCR2/CXCR4 ligands CXCL8 or CXCL12, was identified as a candidate interactor. MIF/CXCL4L1 complexation was verified by co-immunoprecipitation, surface plasmon-resonance analysis, and microscale thermophoresis, which also established high-affinity binding (KD{asymp}100-150 nM). The binding interface was predicted by peptide array-based mapping and molecular docking. We next determined whether heterocomplex formation modulates inflammatory and atherogenic activities of MIF. MIF-elicited T-cell chemotaxis as assessed in a 3D-matrix-based live cell-imaging set-up was abrogated, when cells were co-incubated with MIF and CXCL4L1. Heterocomplexation also blocked MIF-triggered migration of Egfp+ microglia in cortical cultures in situ. Of note, CXCL4L1 blocked the binding of Alexa-MIF to a soluble ectodomain mimic of CXCR4 and co-incubation with CXCL4L1 attenuated MIF-triggered dynamic mass redistribution in HEK293-CXCR4 transfectants, indicating that complex formation interferes with MIF/CXCR4 pathways. As MIF and CXCL4L1 are abundant platelet products, we finally tested their role in platelet activation. Multi-photon microscopy, FLIM- FRET, and proximity ligation assay visualized heterocomplexes in platelet aggregates and clinical human thrombus sections. Moreover, heterocomplex formation inhibited MIF- stimulated thrombus formation under flow and skewed the morphology of adhering platelets from a large to a small lamellipodia phenotype. Together, our study establishes a novel molecular interaction, adding to the complexity of the chemokine interactome and chemokine/receptor network. MIF/CXCL4L1, or more generally, ACK/CXC-motif chemokine heterocomplexes may be promising target structures to modulate inflammation and thrombosis.

immunology↗