Biology subjects

Roderick, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Roderick, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Extraction workflow determines marker-specific recovery andreproducibility in leaf-litter eDNA metabarcoding

Forest-floor leaf litter is a dynamic and structurally complex ecological transition zone and thus a promising substrate for terrestrial eDNA metabarcoding. Yet, extraction workflows for this heterogeneous matrix remain poorly standardized, especially in tropical systems, making it largely impossible to compare ecological functions across space, time, and taxa. To guide workflow selection across a series of selection criteria, including biological target, research question and practical considerations, we compared DNA extraction workflows for leaf-litter eDNA collected from 42 biological samples across seven different forest sites on Oahu, Hawaii. We evaluated four DNA extraction workflows: (1) Two low-volume approaches, with DNA extracted directly from 200 mg of homogenized litter using (i) CTAB or (ii) DNeasy PowerSoil(R); and (2) two high-volume approaches using PBS wash-based from 10 g of litter followed by (i) Centrifugation or (ii) Filtration. Taxonomic recovery from each workflow was evaluated with two COI primer sets targeting arthropods (ANML and shorter NoPlant), and one ITS marker targeting fungi. Results show that eDNA workflows tested here recovered site-level differences among forest-floor communities, but biodiversity recovery depended strongly on extraction workflow and marker. For low volumes, PowerSoil recovered the highest fungal richness (with ITS marker), and produced the most reproducible PCR-replicate profiles across markers, and required the least hands-on time, while CTAB was less expensive but required handling hazardous chemicals. For high volumes workflow, Centrifugation recovered higher arthropod diversity with ANML primer. Differences in community composition were nonetheless recovered by each method. At the same time, sampling sites explained more ASV-level compositional variation than extraction workflow across markers, showing that all workflows retained site-level ecological signals. Together, these results support a workflow framework in which extraction choice depends on target organism group, DNA state, reproducibility needs, and practical constraints.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Emerging Beetle-Pathogen Symbioses and Their Consequences for Forest Health: Lessons from Rapid 'Ohi'a Death in Hawai'i

Invasive ambrosia beetles and fungal pathogens threaten forest ecosystems worldwide, exemplified in Hawaii by the widespread loss of keystone species [o]hia (Metrosideros polymorpha), due to Rapid [O]hia Death (ROD). A unique occurrence of five ambrosia beetle species (one native, four introduced) that vary in their symbiotic relationships with two introduced fungal pathogens provide an opportunity to test hypotheses of how opportunistic symbioses facilitate disease dynamics involving dominant forest trees. ROD is caused by two novel Ceratocystis fungal pathogens whose spores can spread via association with ambrosia beetles as they bore into [o]hia trees. We examined beetle-pathogen interactions of all five ambrosia beetle species in three ROD-affected regions on Hawaii Island, and used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to provide the first molecular confirmation of the two ROD pathogens associated with the exterior, mycangia, and gut of each beetle species. Results from generalized linear models and correlation networks show that pathogen acquisition and transport, including the potential for consumption and the presence of the pathogens, are determined by beetle invasion status and mycangia morphology. A niche construction framework suggests that both varying symbioses and opportunism facilitate disease spread, with the three invasive Xyleborus species emerging as key disease vectors. Identifying the beetle species that are more likely to contribute to disease spread, and understanding their biology as vectors, can inform targeted conservation strategies for [o]hia and for insect-pathogen threats in forests worldwide, and illustrates the potential ecosystem-level impacts of novel and opportunistic symbioses between globally distributed invasive vectors and pathogens.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk DNA metabarcoding for assessing terrestrial arthropod diversity across three habitat types on Guam

DNA based methods offer a rapid and cost-effective way for detecting species occurrence and monitoring biodiversity; among them bulk DNA metabarcoding is well-established, and recently developed environmental DNA (eDNA)-based methods offer a non-destructive alternative. With a goal to develop suitable methods for assessing insect biodiversity in ecosystems for which DNA reference libraries are not well developed and incomplete, such as remote islands, we compared established bulk DNA metabarcoding methods with eDNA across three replicated terrestrial ecosystem types (limestone forest, degraded forest, and grassland) in Guam. Using two mitochondrial COI primer pairs, we performed bulk DNA metabarcoding of standard entomological collection methods (malaise traps, pan traps, vegetation beating), and compared the assessment of biodiversity with that from different eDNA sources (flowers, spider webs, leaves, tree trunks). In our samples, eDNA and bulk DNA metabarcoding both detected a large proportion of overall taxa (OTUs, 86.6% and 60.3%, respectively). Although DNA metabarcoding detected significantly more taxa, eDNA proved to be a reasonable non-destructive alternative. As expected, because of limitations in existing reference databases for remote habitats, species-level identification was achieved for only a few OTUs. Overall, the sampling approach was the dominant driver of arthropod diversity, explaining [~]17% of the observed variation, while habitat type accounted for [~]4%. Thus, each sampling approach captured some unique diversity signals and contributed to the complementary effect of maximizing detection. For rapid insect biodiversity surveys of terrestrial arthropods, we recommend an integrated metabarcoding approach, and in sensitive habitats where insect capture is undesirable, eDNA offers a powerful alternative to monitor diversity and community change.

ecology↗