Robinson, B. M. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

Qualitatively different delay-dependent working memory distortions in people with schizophrenia and healthy control subjects

BackgroundImpairments in working memory(WM) have been well-documented in people with schizophrenia(PSZ). However, these quantitative WM impairments can often be explained by nonspecific factors, such as impaired goal maintenance. Here, we used a spatial orientation delayed-response task to explore a qualitative difference in WM dynamics between PSZ and healthy control subjects(HCS). Specifically, we took advantage of the discovery that WM representations may drift either toward or away from previous-trial targets(serial dependence). We tested the hypothesis that WM representations drift toward the previous-trial target in HCS but away from the previous-trial target in PSZ. MethodsWe assessed serial dependence in PSZ(N=31) and HCS(N=25), using orientation as the to-be-remembered feature and memory delays from 0 to 8s. Participants were asked to remember the orientation of a teardrop-shaped object and reproduce the orientation after a varying delay period. ResultsConsistent with prior studies, we found that current-trial memory representations were less precise in PSZ than in HCS. We also found that WM for the current-trial orientation drifted toward the previous-trial orientation in HCS(representational attraction) but drifted away from the previous-trial orientation in PSZ(representational repulsion). ConclusionsThese results demonstrate a qualitative difference in WM dynamics between PSZ and HCS that cannot easily be explained by nuisance factors such as reduced effort. Most computational neuroscience models also fail to explain these results, because they maintain information solely by means of sustained neural firing, which does not extend across trials. The results suggest a fundamental difference between PSZ and HCS in longer-term memory mechanisms that persist across trials, such as short-term potentiation and neuronal adaptation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

The Impact of Reward on Attention in Schizophrenia

Traditionally, attention was thought to be directed by either top-down goals or bottom-up salience. Recent studies have shown that the reward history of a stimulus feature also acts as a powerful attentional cue. This is particularly relevant in schizophrenia, which is characterized by motivational and attentional deficits. Here, we examine the impact of reward on selective attention.\n\nForty-eight people with schizophrenia (PSZ) and 34 non-psychiatric control subject (NCS) discriminated the location of a target dot appearing inside a left circle or right circle. The circles were different colors, one of which was associated with reward via pre-training. In the first 2 blocks, targets were equally likely to appear in the left or right circle. In the last 4 blocks, the target was 75% likely on one side, thus allowing us to separately examine how attention was impacted by reward (color) and probability (location).\n\nPSZ had slower overall reaction times (RTs) than NCS. Both groups showed robust effects of spatial probability and reward history, with faster RTs for the rewarded color and for the more probable location. These effects were similar in PSZ and NCS. Negative symptom severity correlated with overall RT slowing, but there were no correlations between symptoms and reward-associated biasing of attention.\n\nPSZ demonstrated RT slowing but normal reward history and spatial probability-driven RT facilitation. These results are conceptually similar to prior findings showing intact implicit reward effects on response bias, and suggest that implicit processing of reward and probability is intact in PSZ.

neuroscience↗