Biology subjects

Ries, A. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Ries, A. L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Determinants of Cancer-specific Quality of Life in Veteran Lung Cancer Survivors Eligible for Long-Term Cure

Rationale/ObjectiveQuality of life (QoL) is an important issue in lung cancer survivors. We aimed to identify determinants of QoL in lung cancer survivors eligible for long-term cure.\n\nMethodsWe performed an exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional study of consecutive lung cancer survivors who completed curative-intent treatment [≥]1 month previously. Variables tested included demographic, clinical, physiologic, and symptom-specific patient-reported outcome measures. We defined the primary outcome as a previously-validated cancer-specific QoL measure - the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (C30) summary score. We also verified our findings with the C30 global health status/QoL subscale and a summated score of lung cancer-specific QoL from the EORTC-Lung Cancer Module 13.\n\nResultsIn 75 enrolled participants, measures of fatigue, depression, sleep difficulties, and dyspnea were statistically significant determinants of the C30 summary score in multivariable linear regression analyses. Together, these four symptoms accounted for approximately 85% of the variance in cancer-specific QoL (p<0.001). When we verified our findings with global QoL and lung cancer-specific QoL, fatigue and dyspnea were consistent determinants of QoL.\n\nConclusionsWe found four symptoms - dyspnea, fatigue, depression, and sleep difficulties - that are important determinants of and together accounted for almost all of the variance in cancer-specific QoL in lung cancer survivors eligible for long-term cure. These findings have implications to reduce symptom burden and improve function and QoL in these patients.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Effects of Curative-Intent Lung Cancer Therapy on Functional Exercise Capacity and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BackgroundLung cancer treatment can lead to negative health consequences. We analyzed the effects of curative-intent lung cancer treatment on functional exercise capacity (EC) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).\n\nMethodsWe performed a prospective-observational cohort study of consecutive patients with stage I-IIIA lung cancer undergoing curative-intent therapy and assessed functional EC [primary outcome, six-minute walk distance (6MWD)], cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) [secondary outcome, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) summary score], and exploratory outcomes including dyspnea [University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ)] and fatigue [Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)] symptoms before and at 1 to 3 months post-treatment. We analyzed the time effect of treatment on outcomes using multivariable generalized estimating equations.\n\nResultsIn 35 enrolled participants, treatment was borderline-significantly associated with a clinically-meaningful decline in functional EC [(mean change, 95% CI) 6MWD = -25.4m (-55.3, +4.47), p=0.10], non-significant change in cancer-specific QoL [EORTC-QLQ-C30 summary score = - 3.4 (-9.8, +3.0), p=0.30], and statistically-significant and clinically-meaningful higher dyspnea [UCSD-SOBQ = +13.1 (+5.7, +20.6), p=0.001] and increased fatigue [BFI = +10.0 (+2.9, +17.0), p=0.006].\n\nConclusionsAmong the first prospective analysis of the effect of curative-intent lung cancer treatment on functional EC and PROs, we observed worsening dyspnea and fatigue, and possibly a decline in functional EC but not cancer-specific QoL at 1 to 3 months post-treatment. Interventions to reduce treatment-related morbidities and improve lung cancer survivorship may need to focus on reducing dyspnea, fatigue, and/or improving functional EC.\n\nConsent and ApprovalWritten informed consent was obtained from each participant included in this study. All human investigations were performed after approval by the VA San Diego Healthcare System institutional review board and in accord with an assurance filed with and approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Characterization of Dyspnea in Lung Cancer Survivors Following Curative-Intent Therapy

PurposeDyspnea is highly-prevalent in lung cancer survivors following curative-intent therapy. We aimed to identify clinical determinants of dyspnea and characterize its relationship with functional exercise capacity (EC).\n\nMethodsIn an analysis of data from a cross-sectional study of lung cancer survivors who completed curative-intent therapy for stage I-IIIA disease [≥]1 month previously, we tested a thorough list of comorbidities, lung function, and lung cancer characteristics. We assessed dyspnea using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 (LC13) and functional EC the six-minute walk. We verified results with the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ).\n\nResultsIn 75 participants at a median of 12 months since completing treatment, the mean (SD) LC13-Dyspnea score was 35.3 (26.2); 60% had abnormally-high dyspnea. In multivariable linear regression analyses, significant clinical determinants of dyspnea were [{beta} (95% confidence interval)]: psychiatric illness [-20.8 (-32.4, -9.09) for No/Yes], heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [-15.5 (-28.0, -2.97) for No/Yes], and forced expiratory volume in 1 second [-0.28 (-0.49, -0.06) for each % predicted]. Dyspnea was an independent predictor of functional EC [-1.54 (-2.43, -0.64) for each point]. These results were similar with the SOBQ.\n\nConclusionWe identified clinical determinants of dyspnea which have pathophysiological bases. Dyspnea was independently associated with functional EC. Behavioral interventions to promote exercise in lung cancer survivors following curative-intent therapy may need to also optimize medical therapy for cardiopulmonary and/or psychiatric disease and reduce dyspnea to be effective.

epidemiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Determinants of Heart Rate Recovery and Heart Rate Variability in Lung Cancer Survivors Eligible for Long-Term Cure

BackgroundLung cancer survivors are at increased risk for autonomic dysfunction. We aimed to identify determinants of parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) function as reflected by heart rate recovery (HRR) and heart rate variability (HRV) in lung cancer survivors eligible for long-term cure.\n\nMethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive lung cancer survivors who completed curative-intent therapy for stage I-IIIA [≥]1 month previously. We tested a comprehensive list of variables related to baseline demographics, comorbidities, lung cancer characteristics, and physiological/functional measures using univariable and multivariable (MVA) linear regression analyses. We defined HRR as the difference in heart rate (HR) at 1-minute following and the end of the six-minute walk test (6MWT), and HRV the standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and root-mean-square-of-successive-differences (rMSSD) from routine single 10-s electrocardiographs (ECGs).\n\nResultsIn 69 participants, the mean (standard deviation, SD) HRR was -10.6 (6.7) beats. In MVAs, significant independent determinants of HRR [{beta} (95% confidence interval)] were: age [0.17 (0.04, 0,30) for each year] and HR change associated with the 6MWT [0.01 (0.007, 0.02) for each beats/min. In 41 participants who had ECGs available for HRV measurements, the mean (SD) SDNN and rMSSD were 19.1 (15.6) and rMSSD 18.2 (14.6) ms, respectively. In MVAs, significant determinants of HRV were: total lung capacity [0.01 (0.00, 0.02), p=0.047 for each % predicted] and HRR [-0.04 (-0.07, -0.003) for each beat] for natural logarithm (Ln-)SDNN; and [0.01 (0.00, 0.02)] and [-0.04 (-0.07, -0.01)] for Ln-rMSSD, respectively.\n\nConclusionsWe measured determinants of HRR and HRV in lung cancer survivors eligible for long-term cure. HRR and/or HRV may be useful as indicators to stratify patients in interventional studies aimed at improving PNS function in lung cancer survivors, including through exercise training.

epidemiology↗