Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Riecke, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Riecke, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Repeated listening induces exposure-specific cortical tracking of intelligible continuous speech

Neural encoding of acoustic and linguistic features of continuous speech is sensitive to cognitive factors, such as attention and comprehension. We investigated whether neural tracking is also sensitive to the predictability of speech. Participants were repeatedly exposed to intelligible or unintelligible versions of the same audiobook segment while EEG was recorded. First, we fit encoding models to predict EEG responses from acoustic, sublexical, and lexical features of the presented speech. Model comparisons revealed no reliable improvement in model fit when lexical features were included; subsequent analyses were performed on models including only acoustic and sublexical predictors. Second, we compared prediction accuracy for models trained and tested on the same exposures with models trained and tested across different exposures. While we observed no overall change in prediction performance across exposures, we found that models were exposure-specific: prediction performance was highest within the same exposure and decreased with increasing temporal distance between the training and test exposure. This effect was observed for intelligible but not for unintelligible speech, suggesting that the effect depends on properties unique to intelligible speech, such as the ability to form increasingly specific predictions about upcoming linguistic input, rather than general, non-linguistic factors related to repeated exposure. This distance effect was associated with increased model weights from -90 ms to 130 ms, indicating an enhancement of familiar input during an early cortical processing stage. In summary, these findings indicate that cortical tracking of sublexical speech features is modulated by repeated exposure to intelligible speech, consistent with a role for linguistic predictability.

neuroscience

How to test for oscillatory modulation of neural function and behaviour

Research on whether perception or other processes depend on the phase of neural oscillations is rapidly gaining popularity. However, it is unknown which methods are optimally suited to evaluate the hypothesized phase effect. Using a simulation approach, we here test the ability of different methods to detect such an effect on dichotomous (e.g., \"hit\" vs \"miss\") and continuous (e.g., scalp potentials) response variables. We manipulated parameters that characterise the phase effect or define the experimental approach to test for this effect. For each parameter combination and response variable, we identified an optimal method. We found that methods regressing single-trial responses on circular (sine and cosine) predictors perform best for all of the simulated parameters, regardless of the nature of the response variable (dichotomous or continuous). In sum, our study lays a foundation for optimized experimental designs and analyses in future studies investigating the role of phase for neural and behavioural responses. We provide MATLAB code for the statistical methods tested.

neuroscience

Dual-site high-density 4Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation applied over auditory and motor cortical speech areas does not influence auditory-motor mapping

BackgroundVerbal repetition of auditory speech requires the mapping of a sensory acoustic input onto articulatory motor plans (auditory-motor mapping). Recent evidence indicates that auditory-motor mapping could rely on low frequency neural synchronization (i.e., theta oscillatory phase coupling) between sensory and motor speech areas.\n\nObjectiveIn the present study, we apply dual-site high-density (HD) Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (TACS) above the auditory and motor cortex to induce, or disrupt, theta phase coupling between the two areas. We predicted that functionally coupling the two areas would strengthen auditory-motor mapping, compared with functionally decoupling them. We assessed the strength of auditory-motor mapping using a verbal repetition task.\n\nResultsWe found no significant effect of TACS-induced theta phase coupling on auditory-motor mapping as indexed by verbal repetition performance.\n\nConclusionAuditory-motor mapping may rely on a different mechanism than we hypothesized, for example, oscillatory phase-coupling outside the theta range. Alternatively, modulation of interregional theta-phase coupling may require more effective stimulation protocols, for example, TACS at higher intensities.

neuroscience