Route of oxytetracycline administration differentially impacts the growth and gut microbiome of pigs co-infected with Bordetella bronchiseptica and Pasteurella multocida
Along with judicious antibiotic use, there is great interest in how the dose regimen of an antibiotic affects the animal gut microbiota. This study evaluated the impact of experimental respiratory infection alone or respiratory infection followed by oxytetracycline (oxytet) treatment on the animals health and its fecal microbiome. Piglets of approximately three weeks-of-age were separated into four groups (n=20 per group). One group remained non-infected and administered non-medicated feed and the other three groups were infected with Bordetella bronchiseptica (day 0) and Pasteurella multocida (day 4), with one group receiving non- medicated feed and the remaining two groups receiving oxytetr starting on day 7 by injection or in-feed (day 7-14). Infection with B. bronchiseptica and P. multocida negatively impacted piglet growth and induced mild pneumonia. Infection alone had minimal effect on the fecal microbiota community. When oxytet was administered either by injection or in-feed to treat the respiratory infections, both routes had minimal effect on clearing B. bronchiseptica and P. multocida in the animal. However, both routes appeared to limit lung lesion severity, and injected oxytet reduced the negative impact of infection on weight gain. Both routes had limited impact on the animals overall gut microbiome, including relative abundances of bacterial taxa and antibiotic resistance genes tet32, tetW, and aph2. Overall, oxytet administered by either route did not clear the respiratory infection, but oxytet administration minimized the negative health impacts of infection and had minor impact on the pig gut microbiome. ImportanceEfforts to address antibiotic resistance calls for improved antibiotic stewardship, including considering antibiotic administration route. While our previous study found in-feed oxytet had greater impact on the gut microbiome of healthy piglets than injected oxytet, it remained unknown if oxytet treatments would have the same impact on the microbiota of infected piglets. We evaluated the impact of respiratory infection alone or respiratory infection followed by oxytet treatment on the animals health and their gut microbiome profile. Respiratory infection negatively affected piglets health, but infection alone had minimal impact on the gut community. When oxytet was administered either in-feed or by injection to treat the respiratory infection, neither route of administration led to the clearance of the respiratory pathogens. However, oxytet minimized the negative health impacts of infection, and had minor impact on the pig gut microbiome. These findings are informative for disease management in food animals while integrating antibiotic stewardship practices.