Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Richie, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Richie, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Dietary protein source strongly alters gut microbiota composition and function

The source of protein in a persons diet affects their total life expectancy. However, the mechanisms by which dietary protein sources differentially impact human health and life expectancy are poorly understood. Dietary choices have major impacts on the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota that ultimately modulate host health. This raises the possibility that health outcomes based on dietary protein sources might be driven by interactions between dietary protein and the gut microbiota. In this study, we determined the effects of seven different sources of dietary protein on the gut microbiota of mice using an integrated metagenomics-metaproteomics approach. The protein abundances measured by metaproteomics can provide microbial species abundances, and evidence for the molecular phenotype of microbiota members because measured proteins indicate the metabolic and physiological processes used by a microbial community. We showed that dietary protein source significantly altered the species composition and overall function of the gut microbiota. Different dietary protein sources led to changes in the abundance of microbial proteins involved in the degradation of amino acids and the degradation of glycosylations conjugated to dietary protein. In particular, brown rice and egg white protein increased the abundance of amino acid degrading enzymes. Egg white protein increased the abundance of bacteria and proteins usually associated with the degradation of the intestinal mucus barrier. These results show that dietary protein sources can change the gut microbiotas metabolism, which could have major implications in the context of gut microbiota mediated diseases.

microbiology↗

Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Many of the frequently used defined diets use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that this casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and show that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study. ImportanceMany diets used in diet-microbiota studies use casein as the source of dietary protein. We found large quantities of microbial DNA and protein in casein-based diets. This microbial DNA and protein are resilient to digestion as it is present in fecal samples of mice consuming casein-based diets. This contribution of diet-derived microbial DNA and protein to microbiota measurements may influence results and conclusions and must therefore be considered in diet-microbiota studies. We tested additional dietary protein sources and did not detect microbial DNA or protein. Our findings highlight the necessity of evaluating diet samples in diet-microbiota studies to ensure that potential microbial content of the diet can be accounted for in microbiome measurements.

microbiology↗