Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Reyes-Bonilla, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Reyes-Bonilla, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

eDNA metabarcoding shows highly diverse but distinct shallow, mid-water, and deep-water eukaryotic communities within a marine biodiversity hotspot

As the impact of human activities continues to move beyond shallow coastal waters into deeper ocean layers, it is fundamental to describe how diverse and distinct the eukaryotic assemblages from the deep layers are compared to shallow ecosystems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a molecular tool that can overcome many logistical barriers in exploring remote deep ocean areas. We analyzed thirty-two paired seawater samples collected via SCUBA and Niskin samplers from shallow (< 30 m) and deep ecosystems (40-500 m) within a recognized hotspot of marine biodiversity (Gulf of California, Mexico). We sequenced an eDNA metabarcoding library targeting the COI gene of eukaryotes. We demonstrated that the diversity of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) did not peak at shallow coastal regions and that the deep samples had similar levels of biodiversity to shallow sites but detected a significant vertical zonation between shallow and deeper habitats. Our results suggest that the deep refugia hypothesis applies to about a third of the 5495 OTUs identified that were shared between shallow and deep layer samples. At the same time, most taxa were exclusive from either shallow or deep zones. The observation that deep communities were as rich but quite distinct as shallow communities supports extending spatial management and conservation tools to deeper habitats to include a significant fraction of phylogenetic and functional diversity exclusive of mid and deep-water ecosystems.

genomics↗

Beyond traditional biodiversity fish monitoring: environmental DNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual census detect different sets of a complex fish community at a marine biodiversity hotspot

Significant advances in the study of marine fish communities have been achieved with traditional monitoring methods and recently with novel genetic approaches. eDNA metabarcoding is one of them and a powerful tool for the study of biodiversity still in continuous development. Its applicability in marine ecology and conservation studies may be gauged by comparing its results with those of traditional methods. In the present investigation, we compare results from the underwater visual census (UVC) with eDNA metabarcoding (eDNA) carried out simultaneously in 24 rocky reef sites along the Gulf of California. We developed a two-PCR library preparation protocol followed by high throughput sequencing aimed at teleost fish. Our results show that both methods had different detection capabilities, and each registered different sets of fish taxa from rocky reefs, with some overlap. In particular, eDNA identified taxa from pelagic, demersal, and estuarine habitats beyond the rocky reef itself, suggesting differences in detection mainly attributed to the transport and permanence time of the eDNA in the ocean. Overlap in the detection with both methods increased with taxonomic level. We argue that substantial gaps in sequence reference databases for teleost are at the root of major discrepancies. Our results also confirm that PCR-based eDNA metabarcoding of seawater samples does not reflect patterns in abundance and biomass of species estimated from traditional methods. We discuss how to reconcile the results of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional methods in marine hotspots.

genomics↗