Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Rendon, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Rendon, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

G2P: Using machine learning to understand and predict genes causing rare neurological disorders

To facilitate precision medicine and neuroscience research, we developed a machine-learning technique that scores the likelihood that a gene, when mutated, will cause a neurological phenotype. We analysed 1126 genes relating to 25 subtypes of Mendelian neurological disease defined by Genomics England (March 2017) together with 154 gene-specific features capturing genetic variation, gene structure and tissue-specific expression and co-expression. We randomly re-sampled genes with no known disease association to develop bootstrapped decision-tree models, which were integrated to generate a decision tree-based ensemble for each disease subtype. Genes generating larger numbers of distinct transcripts and with higher probability of having missense mutations in normal individuals were significantly more likely to cause neurological diseases. Using mouse-mutant phenotypic data we tested the accuracy of gene-phenotype predictions and found that for 88% of all disease subtypes there was a significant enrichment of relevant phenotypic abnormalities when predicted genes were mutated in mice and in many cases mutations produced specific and matching phenotypes. Furthermore, using only newly identified genes included in the Genomics England November 2017 release, we assessed our gene-phenotype predictions and showed an 8.3 fold enrichment relative to chance for correct predictions. Thus, we demonstrate both the explanatory and predictive power of machine-learning-based models in neurological disease.

genetics

Comparative analysis of neutrophil and monocyte epigenomes

Neutrophils and monocytes provide a first line of defense against infections as part of the innate immune system. Here we report the integrated analysis of transcriptomic and epigenetic landscapes for circulating monocytes and neutrophils with the aim to enable downstream interpretation and functional validation of key regulatory elements in health and disease. We collected RNA-seq data, ChIP-seq of six histone modifications and of DNA methylation by bisulfite sequencing at base pair resolution from up to 6 individuals per cell type. Chromatin segmentation analyses suggested that monocytes have a higher number of cell-specific enhancer regions (4-fold) compared to neutrophils. This highly plastic epigenome is likely indicative of the greater differentiation potential of monocytes into macrophages, dendritic cells and osteoclasts. In contrast, most of the neutrophil-specific features tend to be characterized by repressed chromatin, reflective of their status as terminally differentiated cells. Enhancers were the regions where most of differences in DNA methylation between cells were observed, with monocyte-specific enhancers being generally hypomethylated. Monocytes show a substantially higher gene expression levels than neutrophils, in line with epigenomic analysis revealing that gene more active elements in monocytes. Our analyses suggest that the overexpression of c-Myc in monocytes and its binding to monocyte-specific enhancers could be an important contributor to these differences. Altogether, our study provides a comprehensive epigenetic chart of chromatin states in primary human neutrophils and monocytes, thus providing a valuable resource for studying the regulation of the human innate immune system.

genomics