Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Reed, K. S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Reed, K. S. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Temporal analysis suggests a reciprocal relationship between 3D chromatin structure and transcription

To infer potential causal relationships between 3D chromatin structure, enhancers, and gene transcription, we mapped each feature in a genome-wide fashion across eight narrowly-spaced timepoints of macrophage activation. Enhancers and genes connected by loops exhibited stronger correlations between histone H3K27 acetylation and expression than can be explained by genomic distance or physical proximity alone. Changes in acetylation at looped distal enhancers preceded changes in gene expression. Changes in gene expression exhibit a directional bias at differential loop anchors; gained loops are associated with increased expression of genes oriented away from the center of the loop, while lost loops were often accompanied by high levels of transcription with the loop boundaries themselves. Taken together, these results are consistent with a reciprocal relationship in which loops can facilitate increased transcription by connecting promoters to distal enhancers while high levels of transcription can impede loop formation. HIGHLIGHTSO_LILPS + IFN{gamma} triggers genome-wide changes in chromatin looping, enhancer acetylation, and gene expression C_LIO_LILooped enhancer-promoter pairs exhibit ordered and correlated changes in acetylation and expression C_LIO_LIChanges in gene expression exhibit a directional bias at differential loop anchors C_LIO_LILost loops are associated with high levels of transcription within loop boundaries C_LI

genomics↗

Synthetic amyloid beta does not induce a robust transcriptional response in innate immune cell culture systems

Alzheimers disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that impacts nearly 400 million people worldwide. The accumulation of amyloid beta (A{beta}) in the brain has historically been associated with AD, and recent evidence suggests that neuroinflammation plays a central role in its origin and progression. These observations have given rise to the theory that A{beta} is the primary trigger of AD, and induces proinflammatory activation of immune brain cells (i.e. microglia), which culminates in neuronal damage and cognitive decline. In order to test this hypothesis, many in vitro systems have been established to study A{beta}-mediated activation of innate immune cells. Nevertheless, the transcriptional resemblance of these models to the microglia in the AD brain has never been comprehensively studied on a genome-wide scale. To address this, we used bulk RNA-seq to assess the transcriptional differences between in vitro cell types used to model neuroinflammation in AD, including several established, primary and iPSC-derived immune cell lines (macrophages, microglia and astrocytes) and their similarities to primary cells in the AD brain. We then analyzed the transcriptional response of these innate immune cells to synthetic A{beta}. We found that human induced pluripotent stem cell (hIPSC)-derived microglia (IMGL) are the in vitro cell model that best resembles primary microglia. Surprisingly, synthetic A{beta} does not trigger a robust transcriptional response in any of the cellular models analyzed, despite testing a wide variety of A{beta} formulations, concentrations, and treatment conditions. Finally, we found that bacterial LPS and INF{gamma} activate microglia and induce transcriptional changes similar to those observed in disease associated microglia present in the AD brain, suggesting the potential suitability of this model to study AD-related neuroinflammation.

neuroscience↗