Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Rebecca Saxe

Publications and source records attributed to Rebecca Saxe.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Directed Network Discovery with Dynamic Network Modeling

Cognitive tasks recruit multiple brain regions. Understanding how these regions influence each other (the network structure) is an important step to characterize the neural basis of cognitive processes. Often, limited evidence is available to restrict the range of hypotheses a priori, and techniques that sift efficiently through a large number of possible network structures are needed (network discovery). This article introduces a novel modeling technique for network discovery (Dynamic Network Modeling or DNM) that builds on ideas from Granger Causality and Dynamic Causal Modeling introducing three key changes: 1) regularization is exploited for efficient network discovery, 2) the magnitude and sign of each influence are tested with a random effects model across participants, and 3) variance explained in independent data is used as an absolute (rather than relative) measure of the quality of the network model. In this article, we outline the functioning of DNM and we report an example of its application to the investigation of influences between regions during emotion recognition. Across two experiments, DNM individuates a stable set of influences between face-selective regions during emotion recognition.\n\nNew and NoteworthyIn this article we introduce a new analysis method (Dynamic Network Mod- elling or DNM) which exploits{ell} 1 regularization to perform efficient for network discovery. DNM provides information about the direction and sign (inhibitory vs excitatory) of influences between brain regions, and generates measures of variance explained in independent data to evaluate quality of fit. The method is applied to brain regions engaged in emotion recognition, individuating a similar network structure across two separate experiments.

Neuroscience

Multivariate Pattern Connectivity

When we perform a cognitive task, multiple brain regions are engaged. Understanding how these regions interact is a fundamental step to uncover the neural bases of behavior. Most research on the interactions between brain regions has focused on the univariate responses in the regions. However, fine grained patterns of response encode important information, as shown by multivariate pattern analysis. In the present article, we introduce and apply multivariate pattern connectivity (MVPC): a technique to study the dependence between brain regions in humans in terms of the multivariate relations between their patterns of responses. MVPC characterizes the responses in each brain region as trajectories in region-specific multidimensional spaces, and models the multivariate relationship between these trajectories. Considering the fusiform face area (FFA) as a seed region, we used searchlight-based MVPC to reveal interactions between regions undetected by univariate functional connectivity analyses. MVPC (but not functional connectivity) identified significant interactions between right FFA and the right anterior temporal lobe, the right superior temporal sulcus, and the dorsal visual stream. Additionally, MVPC outperformed univariate connectivity in its ability to explain independent variance in the responses of individual voxels. In the end, MVPC uncovered different connectivity profiles associated with different representational subspaces of FFA: the first principal component of FFA shows differential connectivity with occipital and parietal regions implicated in the processing of low-level properties of faces, while the second and third components show differential connectivity with anterior temporal regions implicated in the processing of invariant representations of face identity.\n\nAuthor SummaryHuman behavior is supported by systems of brain regions that exchange infor-mation to complete a task. This exchange of information between brain regions leads to statistical relationships between their responses over time. Most likely, these relationships do not link only the mean responses in two brain regions, but also their finer spatial patterns. Analyzing finer response patterns has been a key advance in the study of responses within individual regions, and can be leveraged to study between-region interactions. To capture the overall statistical relationship between two brain regions, we need to describe each regions responses with respect to dimensions that best account for the variation in that region over time. These dimensions can be different from region to region. We introduce an approach in which each regions responses are characterized in terms of region-specific dimensions that best account for its responses, and the relationships between regions are modeled with multivariate linear models. We demonstrate that this approach provides a better account of the data as compared to standard functional connectivity, and we use it to discover multiple dimensions within the fusiform face area that have different connectivity profiles with the rest of the brain.

Neuroscience