Biology subjects

Rayee, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Rayee, D..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Identification and classification of abundant RNA-binding proteins in the mouse lens and interactions of Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, and Ybx1 with crystallin and β-actin mRNAs

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are critical regulators of mRNAs controlling all processes such as RNA transcription, transport, localization, translation, mRNA:ncRNA interactions, and decay. Cellular differentiation is driven by tissue-specific and/or tissue-preferred expression of proteins needed for the optimal function of mature cells, tissues and organs. Lens fiber cell differentiation is marked by high levels of expression of crystallin genes encoding critical proteins for lens transparency and light refraction. Herein we performed proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of RBPs in differentiating mouse lenses to identify the most abundant RBPs and establish dynamic changes of their expression in differentiating lens. Expression analyses include highly abundant RBPs, including Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, Ybx1, Pabpc1, Ddx39, and Rbm38. Binding sites of Carhsp1, Ybx1, and Igf2bp1/ZBP1 were predicted in various crystallin and {beta}-actin mRNAs. Immunoprecipitations using antibodies against Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, and Ybx1 confirmed their interactions with A-, B-, and {gamma}A-crystallin mRNAs. A combination of single molecule RNA FISH (smFISH) and immunofluorescence was used to probe in vivo interactions of these RBPs with A-, B-crystallin, and {beta}-actin mRNAs in cytoplasm and nucleoplasm of cultured mouse lens epithelial cells. Together, these results open new avenues to perform comprehensive genetic, cell, and molecular biology studies of individual RBPs in the lens.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Analysis of mouse lens morphological and proteomic abnormalities following depletion of βB3-crystallin

Crystallin proteins serve as both essential structural and as well as protective components of the ocular lens and are required for the transparency and light refraction properties of the organ. The mouse lens crystallin proteome is represented by A-, B-, {beta}A1-, {beta}A2-, {beta}A3-, {beta}A4-, {beta}B1-, {beta}B2-, {beta}B3-, {gamma}A-, {gamma}B-, {gamma}C-, {gamma}D-, {gamma}E, {gamma}F-, {gamma}N-, and {gamma}S-crystallin proteins encoded by 16 genes. Their mutations are responsible for lens opacification and early onset cataract formation. While many cataract-causing missense and nonsense mutations are known for these proteins, including the human CRYBB3 gene, the mammalian loss-of function model of the Crybb3 gene remains to be established. Herein, we generated the first mouse model via deletion of the Crybb3 promoter that abolished expression of the {beta}B3-crystallin. Histological analysis of lens morphology using newborn {beta}B3-crystallin-deficient lenses revealed disrupted lens morphology with early-onset phenotypic variability. In-depth lens proteomics at four time points (newborn, 3-weeks, 6-weeks, and 3-months) showed both down- and up-regulation of various proteins, with the highest divergence from control mice observed in 3-months lenses. Apart from the {beta}B3-crystallin, another protein Smarcc1/Baf155 was down-regulated in all four samples. In addition, downregulation of Hspe1, Pdlim1, Ast/Got, Lsm7, Ddx23, and Acad11 was found in three time points. Finally, we show that the {beta}B3-crystallin promoter region, which contains multiple binding sites for the transcription factors AP-2, c-Jun, c-Maf, Etv5, and Pax6 is activated by FGF2 in primary lens cell culture experiments. Together, these studies establish the mouse Crybb3 loss-of-function model and its disrupted crystallin and non-crystallin proteomes.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Continuous nucleolar ribosomal RNA synthesis in differentiating lens fiber cells until abrupt nuclear degradation required for ocular lens transparency

Cellular differentiation requires highly coordinate action of all three transcriptional systems to produce rRNAs, mRNAs, and various "short" and "long" non-coding RNAs by RNA Polymerase I, II, and III systems, respectively. The RNA Polymerase I catalyzes transcription of about 400 copies of rDNA genes generating 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNA molecules from the individual primary transcript. Lens fiber cell differentiation is a unique process to study transcriptional mechanisms of individual crystallin genes as their very high transcriptional outputs are directly comparable only to globin genes in erythrocytes. Importantly, both terminally differentiated lens fiber cells and mammalian erythrocytes degrade their nuclei though by different mechanisms. In lens, generation of organelle-free zone (OFZ) includes degradation of mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and nuclei; nevertheless, very little is known about their nucleoli and rRNA transcription. Here, using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) we evaluated nascent rRNA transcription during the entire process of lens fiber cell differentiation. The lens fiber cell nuclei undergo morphological changes prior their denucleation, including chromatin condensation; remarkably, the nascent rRNA transcription persists in all nuclei next to the OFZ. The changes in both nuclei and nucleoli shape and microarchitecture were evaluated by immunofluorescence to detect fibrillarin, nucleolin, UBF, and other nuclear proteins. These studies demonstrate for the first time that highly condensed lens fiber cell nuclei have the capacity to support rRNA transcription. Thus, "late" production of rRNA molecules and consequently the ribosomes contribute to the terminal translational mechanisms to produce maximal quantities of the crystallin proteins.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Mapping the content of comments on bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints

IntroductionPreprints have been increasingly used in biomedical sciences, providing the opportunity for research to be publicly assessed before journal publication. With the increase in attention over preprints during the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to assess the content of comments left on preprint platforms. MethodsPreprints posted on bioRxiv and medRxiv in 2020 were accessed through each platforms API, and a random sample of preprints that had received between 1 and 20 comments was analyzed. Comments were evaluated in triplicate by independent evaluators using an instrument that assessed their features and general content. Results7.3% of preprints received at least 1 comment during a mean follow-up of 7.5 months. Analyzed comments had a median size of 43 words. Criticisms, corrections or suggestions were the most prevalent type of content, followed by compliments or positive appraisals and questions. Most critical comments regarded interpretation, data collection and methodological design, while compliments were usually about relevance and implications. ConclusionsOnly a small percentage of preprints posted in 2020 in bioRxiv and medRxiv received comments in these platforms. When present, however, these comments address content that is similar to that analyzed by traditional peer review. A more precise taxonomy of peer review functions would be desirable to describe whether post-publication peer review fulfills these roles.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2019

The reliability of the isotropic fractionator method for counting total cells and neurons

BackgroundThe Isotropic Fractionator (IF) is a method used to determine the cellular composition of nervous tissue. It has been mostly applied to assess variation across species, where differences are expected to be large enough not to be masked by methodological error. However, understanding the sources of variation in the method is important if the goal is to detect smaller differences, for example, in same-species comparisons. Comparisons between different mice strains suggest that the IF is consistent enough to detected these differences. Nevertheless, the internal validity of the method has not yet been examined directly.\n\nMethodIn this study, we evaluate the reliability of the IF method for the determination of cellular and neuronal numbers. We performed repeated cell counts of the same material by different experimenters to quantify different sources of variation.\n\nResultsIn total cell counts, we observed that for the cerebral cortex most of the variance was at the counter level. For the cerebellum, most of the variance is attributed to the sample itself. As for neurons, random error along with the immunological staining correspond to most of the variation, both in the cerebral cortex and in the cerebellum. Test-retest reliability coefficients were relatively high, especially for cell counts.\n\nConclusionsAlthough biases between counters and random variation in staining could be problematic when aggregating data from different sources, we offer practical suggestions to improve the reliability of the method. While small, this study is a most needed step towards more precise measurement of the brains cellular composition.\n\nHighlightsO_LIMost variance in cell counts was between counters ({eta} = 0.58) for cerebral cortices.\nC_LIO_LIFor cerebella, most of the variance was attributed to the samples ({eta} = 0.49).\nC_LIO_LIVariance in immunocytochemical counts was mostly residual/random ({eta} > 0.8).\nC_LIO_LITest-retest reliability was high (same counter, same sample).\nC_LIO_LIPractical suggestions are offered to improve the reliability of the method.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

BackgroundPreprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the readers ability to independently interpret data and reproduce findings. MethodsIn this observational study, we initially compared independent samples of articles published in bioRxiv and in PubMed-indexed journals in 2016 using a quality of reporting questionnaire. After that, we performed paired comparisons between preprints from bioRxiv to their own peer-reviewed versions in journals. ResultsPeer-reviewed articles had, on average, higher quality of reporting than preprints, although the difference was small, with absolute differences of 5.0% [95% CI 1.4, 8.6] and 4.7% [95% CI 2.4, 7.0] of reported items in the independent samples and paired sample comparison, respectively. There were larger differences favoring peer-reviewed articles in subjective ratings of how clearly titles and abstracts presented the main findings and how easy it was to locate relevant reporting information. Changes in reporting from preprints to peer-reviewed versions did not correlate with the impact factor of the publication venue or with the time lag from bioRxiv to journal publication. ConclusionsOur results suggest that, on average, publication in a peer-reviewed journal is associated with improvement in quality of reporting. They also show that quality of reporting in preprints in the life sciences is within a similar range as that of peer-reviewed articles, albeit slightly lower on average, supporting the idea that preprints should be considered valid scientific contributions.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2018

Chronic in vivo optogenetic stimulation modulates Hebbian plasticity and spine density in the mouse hippocampus

Prolonged increases in excitation can trigger cell-wide homeostatic responses in neurons, altering membrane channels, promoting morphological changes and ultimately reducing synaptic weights. However, how synaptic downscaling interacts with classical forms of Hebbian plasticity is still unclear. In this study, we investigated whether chronic optogenetic stimulation of hippocampus CA1 pyramidal neurons in freely-moving mice could (a) cause morphological changes reminiscent of homeostatic scaling, (b) modulate synaptic currents that might compensate for chronic excitation, and (c) lead to alterations in Hebbian plasticity. After 24 h of stimulation with 15-ms blue light pulses every 90 s, dendritic spine density and area were reduced in the CA1 region of mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) when compared to controls. This protocol also reduced the amplitude of mEPSCs for both the AMPA and NMDA components in ex vivo slices obtained from ChR2-expressing mice immediately after the end of stimulation. Lastly, chronic stimulation impaired the induction of LTP and facilitated that of LTD in these slices. Our results indicate that neuronal responses to prolonged network excitation can modulate subsequent Hebbian plasticity in the hippocampus.

neuroscience↗