Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ratanatharathorn, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ratanatharathorn, A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

The Impact of Psychopathology, Social Adversity and Stress-relevant DNAm on Prospective Risk for Post-traumatic Stress: A Machine Learning Approach

BackgroundA range of factors have been identified that contribute to greater incidence, severity, and prolonged course of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including: comorbid and/or prior psychopathology; social adversity such as low socioeconomic position, perceived discrimination, and isolation; and biological factors such as genomic variation at glucocorticoid receptor regulatory network (GRRN) genes. This complex etiology and clinical course make identification of people at higher risk of PTSD challenging. Here we leverage machine learning (ML) approaches to identify a core set of factors that may together predispose persons to PTSD. MethodsWe used multiple ML approaches to assess the relationship among DNA methylation (DNAm) at GRRN genes, prior psychopathology, social adversity, and prospective risk for PTS severity (PTSS). ResultsML models predicted prospective risk of PTSS with high accuracy. The Gradient Boost approach was the top-performing model with mean absolute error of 0.135, mean square error of 0.047, root mean square error of 0.217, and R2 of 95.29%. Prior PTSS ranked highest in predicting the prospective risk of PTSS, accounting for >88% of the prediction. The top ranked GRRN CpG site was cg05616442, in AKT1, and the top ranked social adversity feature was loneliness. ConclusionMultiple factors including prior PTSS, social adversity, and DNAm play a role in predicting prospective risk of PTSS. ML models identified factors accounting for increased PTSS risk with high accuracy, which may help to target risk factors that reduce the likelihood or course of PTSD, potentially pointing to approaches that can lead to early intervention.

bioinformatics↗

A two-stage approach to identifying and validating modifiable factors for the prevention of depression

BackgroundAlthough depression is recognized as the leading cause of disability worldwide, decades of research have identified few actionable preventive factors. Using phenotypic and genomic data from the UK Biobank, we took advantage of a unique opportunity to screen a wide range of potentially modifiable factors that could offset known risk factors for depression.\n\nMethodsWe curated baseline data on more than 100 lifestyle and environmental factors in participants lives, including behavioral (e.g., exercise, sleep, media use, diet), social (e.g., support, activities), and environmental (e.g., greenspace, pollution) variables. In a follow-up survey, participants reported on their traumatic life experiences and mental health, including depression. Polygenic risk scores for depression were generated based on large-scale genome-wide association results. Excluding those meeting criteria for depression at baseline, we identified at-risk individuals at high predicted probability (> 90th percentile) for clinically significant depression at follow-up based on their (i) polygenic risk, or (ii) reported traumatic life events. Using a factors-wide design corrected for multiple testing and adjusted for potential confounders, we identified modifiable factors associated with follow-up depression in the full sample and among at-risk individuals. Using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design, we then examined which significant factors showed potential causal influences on depression risk, or vice versa.\n\nResultsA range of baseline modifiable factors were prospectively associated with follow-up depression, including factors related to social engagement, physical activity, media use, and diet. MR follow-up analyses provided further support for the effects of social support-seeking, TV use, and other factors on depression risk.\n\nConclusionAs the field increasingly quantifies the role of genetic factors in complex conditions such as depression, knowledge of modifiable factors that could offset ones genetic risk has become highly relevant. Here, we present an approach to screening for potentially modifiable factors that may offset the risk of depression in general and among at-risk individuals. In light of the burden of disease associated with depression and the urgent need for actionable preventive strategies, this approach could help prioritize candidates for follow-up studies including clinical trials for depression prevention.

genetics↗

Meta-analysis of longitudinal epigenome-wide association studies of military cohorts reveals multiple CpG sites associated with post-traumatic stress disorder

BackgroundEpigenetic mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Here, blood-derived DNA methylation data (HumanMethylation450 BeadChip) collected prior to and following combat exposure in three cohorts composed of male military members were combined to assess whether DNA methylation profiles are associated with the development of PTSD.\n\nMethodsA total of 123 cases and 143 trauma-exposed controls were included. The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) PTSD EWAS QC pipeline was used on all cohorts, and results were combined using a sample size weighted meta-analysis. We first combined two cohorts in a discovery stage (N=126 and 78), sought targeted replication in the third cohort (N=62) and then performed a meta-analysis of all three datasets.\n\nResultsThe discovery stage identified four CpG sites in which, conditional on pre-deployment DNA methylation, post-deployment DNA methylation was associated with PTSD status after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The most significant CpG (p = 1.0 x 10-08) was located on 5q31 and replicated in the third cohort. When combining all cohorts, this intergenic site remained most significant along with two CpGs located in MAD1L1 and HEXDC. Interestingly, the CpG site of MAD1L1 had an underlying single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) which was located within the same LD block as a recently identified PTSD-associated SNP. Twelve differential methylated regions (DMRs) were also identified, one of which was located in MAD1L1 and four were situated in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region.\n\nConclusionThis study suggests that the development of PTSD is associated with distinct methylation patterns in several genomic positions and regions. Our most prominent finding points to the involvement of MAD1L1 which was previously associated with PTSD.

genetics↗

Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of PTSD across 10 military and civilian cohorts identifies novel methylation loci

Differences in susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be related to epigenetic differences between PTSD cases and trauma-exposed controls. Such epigenetic differences may provide insight into the biological processes underlying the disorder. Here we describe the results of the largest DNA methylation meta-analysis of PTSD to date with data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) PTSD Epigenetics Workgroup. Ten cohorts, military and civilian, contributed blood-derived DNA methylation data (HumanMethylation450 BeadChip) from 1,896 PTSD cases (42%) and trauma-exposed controls (58%). Utilizing a common QC and analysis strategy, we identified ten CpG sites associated with PTSD (9.61E-07<p<4.72E-11) after adjustment for multiple comparisons (FDR<.05). Several CpGs were located in genes previously implicated in PTSD and other psychiatric disorders. The top four CpG sites fell within the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) locus and were associated with lower DNA methylation in PTSD cases relative to controls. Interestingly, this association appeared to uncorrelated with smoking status and was most pronounced in non-smokers with PTSD. Additional evaluation of metabolomics data supported our findings and revealed that AHRR methylation associated with kynurenine levels, which were lower among subjects with PTSD relative to controls. Overall, this study supports epigenetic differences in those with PTSD and suggests a role for decreased kynurenine as a contributor to immune dysregulation in PTSD.

genomics↗

Economic status mediates the relationship between educational attainment and posttraumatic stress disorder: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study

ObjectivesTo investigate the genetic overlap and causal relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traits related to educational attainment.\n\nDesignGenetic correlation, polygenic risk scoring, and causal inference via multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR).\n\nSettingPsychiatric Genomics Consortium for PTSD, UK Biobank, 23andMe, and Social Science Genetic Association Consortium.\n\nParticipants23,185 PTSD cases and 151,309 controls; up to 1,131,881 individuals assessed for educational attainment and related traits.\n\nMain outcome measuresGenetic correlation obtained from linkage disequilibrium score regression, phenotypic variance explained by polygenic risk scores, and casual effects (beta values) estimated with MR\n\nResultsPTSD showed strong negative genetic correlations with educational attainment (EdAtt; rg=-0.26, p=4.6x10-8). PRS based on genome-wide significant variants associated with EdAtt significantly predicted PTSD (p=6.16x10-4), but PRS based on variants associated with PTSD did not predict EdAtt (p>0.05). MR analysis indicated that EdAtt has negative causal effects on PTSD (beta=-0.23, p=0.004). Investigating potential mediators of the EdAtt-PTSD relationship, we observed that propensity for trauma exposure and risk-taking behaviors are risk factors for PTSD independently from EdAtt (beta = 0.36, p = 2.57x10-5 and beta = 0.76, p = 6.75x10-4, respectively), while income fully mediates the causal effect of EdAtt on PSTD (MR: Income - beta = -0.18, p =0.001; EdAtt - beta =-0.23, p=0.004; multivariable MR: Income - beta = -0.32, p = 0.017; EdAtt - beta = -0.04, p = 0.786).\n\nConclusionsWe report novel findings based on large-scale datasets regarding the relationship between educational attainment and PTSD, supporting the role of economic status as the key mediator in the causal relationship observed.\n\nWhat is already known on this topicThere is a well-established negative association of educational attainment and other traits related to cognitive ability with posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD). However, the findings of these previous studies support various possible causal explanations: 1) individuals with high educational attainment are more resilient with respect to developing PTSD, 2) PTSD negatively impacts cognitive ability, or 3) PTSD and educational attainment share some underlying determinants, including relevant molecular mechanisms.\n\nA key obstacle to disentangling the complex association between educational attainment and PTSD is reverse causation, i.e. the situation in which the outcome precedes and causes the exposure instead of the other way around.\n\nWhat this study addsWe conducted a causal-inference investigation based on large-scale information from the investigation of more than one million individuals. Our main assumption is that genetic information can strongly minimize the bias of reverse causation, because genetic variants are determined at conception and do not change throughout life.\n\nOur findings indicate 1) the effect of traits related to educational attainment on PTSD, 2) no reverse effect of PTSD on educational attainment, and 3) economic status mediates the relationship between educational attainment and PTSD, independently from the brain mechanisms related to educational attainment.

genetics↗

Largest genome-wide association study for PTSD identifies genetic risk loci in European and African ancestries and implicates novel biological pathways

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common and debilitating disorder. The risk of PTSD following trauma is heritable, but robust common variants have yet to be identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We have collected a multi-ethnic cohort including over 30,000 PTSD cases and 170,000 controls. We first demonstrate significant genetic correlations across 60 PTSD cohorts to evaluate the comparability of these phenotypically heterogeneous studies. In this largest GWAS meta-analysis of PTSD to date we identify a total of 6 genome-wide significant loci, 4 in European and 2 in African-ancestry analyses. Follow-up analyses incorporated local ancestry and sex-specific effects, and functional studies. Along with other novel genes, a non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and a Parkinsons Disease gene, PARK2, were associated with PTSD. Consistent with previous reports, SNP-based heritability estimates for PTSD range between 10-20%. Despite a significant shared liability between PTSD and major depressive disorder, we show evidence that some of our loci may be specific to PTSD. These results demonstrate the role of genetic variation contributing to the biology of differential risk for PTSD and the necessity of expanding GWAS beyond European ancestry.

genetics↗